Planning Applications Committee Councillor / Officer pre-meetings
Dear Merton Borough Council,
I understand there is a practice of the chair and vice-chair of the Planning Applications Committee holding a pre-meeting before every Planning Applications Committee meeting.
With regard to these pre-meetings please:
a) Explain why these meetings take place
b) Explain the roles of councillors and officers present including whether the officers include case officers, senior planning officers, greenspaces team members, tree officers, conservation officers or others
c) Clarify whether these meetings take place at councillor or officer request
d) Clarify whether any other PAC members are able to attend
e) Clarify the discussion framework including but not restricted to
a. Whether potential refutation of objections is discussed
b. Whether planning policies relating to the application are discussed
f) State when these meetings first started
For every such meeting for the last 15 months (or if they have been happening for less than 15 months for every such meeting that has taken place), please provide:
a) Attendance list – all councillors, all officers and any others present
b) Agenda – or a list of which applications were discussed, with both application number and its title, and what other matters were discussed
c) Notes of these meetings including formal or informal written notes
d) All email correspondence relating to these meetings
Yours faithfully,
Sandra Vogel
Thank you for your email message. We aim to respond to all requests under
the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and Environmental Information
Regulations 2004 within 20 working days. More information about the way we
deal with information requests is on our web site at
[1]www.merton.gov.uk/foi
Information Governance Team
London Borough of Merton.
020 8545 4634
References
Visible links
1. http://www.merton.gov.uk/foi
Dear Merton Borough Council,
I am writing to prompt you to respond to this request please as it is now overdue.
Yours faithfully,
Sandra Vogel
Thank you for your email message. We aim to respond to all requests under
the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and Environmental Information
Regulations 2004 within 20 working days. More information about the way we
deal with information requests is on our web site at
[1]www.merton.gov.uk/foi
Information Governance Team
London Borough of Merton.
020 8545 4634
References
Visible links
1. http://www.merton.gov.uk/foi
Dear Ms Vogel
Pease find attached the Council’s response to your Freedom of Information
enquiry.
Yours sincerely.
Sarah Stevens
Interim Building & Development Manager - London Borough of Merton
Dear Sarah Stevens,
Thank you for your reply.
You have not answered question f). Please can you answer that question.
Where I asked about meetings that have taken place for the past 15 months (and this now means the past 17 months as there have been nearly two months between the original request and this follow-up):
1) With regard to question a) for the attendance list. Your response lists PAC chair and vice chair, heads of services and development control team leaders. You have not clarified if other officers attend (for example the conservation officer). Can I ask you to please examine the email record and any other relevant records and produce, as requested, an attendance list for each of these meetings for the last 17 months.
2) Where I asked about meetings that have taken place for the past 15 months (and this now means the past 17 months for the reason given above), with regard to question b) for information on what was discussed. Your response does not answer the question. Please can you consult with colleagues, PAC members and the email record as well as, for meetings you have attended, your own records, and, as requested, provide, for each of the applications discussed at each meeting, the application number and title, and what was discussed in relation to those applications.
3) Where I asked about meetings that have taken place for the past 15 months (and this now means the past 17 months for the reason given above), with regard to question d) You have not provided me with email correspondence. Please can you answer the question by providing all email correspondence relating to these meetings.
Yours sincerely,
Sandra Vogel
Dear Ms Vogel
I refer to your email dated 26 September concerning the Council's response
to you recent FOI request. I am sorry that you feel we have not answered
your questions and I would make the following comments
* The answers are the same for 17 months as they are for a 15 month
period.
* We have listed all those persons who attend the meetings, No records
Email or other are taken or kept of attendance or the content of any
discussion.
* You can find the applications that may have been discussed by looking
at the Planning Committee agendas on the Council's website at
[1]https://democracy.merton.gov.uk/ieDocHom...
I hope this clarifies the matter.
Kind regards
Sarah Stevens
Dear Merton Borough Council,
Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of Information reviews.
I am writing to request an internal review of Merton Borough Council's handling of my FOI request 'Planning Applications Committee Councillor / Officer pre-meetings'.
I asked for a range of information relating to these pre-meetings for the last 15 months - rising this timeframe to the last 17 months due to slowness of response.
I was surprised to be given generic rather than specific answers to many of my questions, and to be told that there is no record of who has attended each of these meetings.
I ask please for the detail, per meeting of who attended on both the officer and councillor side, rahter than a general list of who might attend any of these meetings.
I was suprised to be told there is no record of the planning applications discussed at each meeting, instead being referred to the PAC agendas.
I specifically wish to know which planning applications were discussed in each meeting, and request that information is provided.
I asked for email correspondence relating to each of these meetings and was given a generic response rather than the emails themselves. The response I received was " Emails are principally in the form of the Democratic Service or the Section Head checking with members as to their availability and on occasion re-scheduling a meeting to suit members’ other commitments."
When I followed up on this response I was given another generic response which did not answer my questions on a per meeting basis, and I was not given the emails that I again requested.
The inference from the response is that there are emails. I ask please for all email correspondence relating to the last 17 of these meetings (as identified by the date of my request) to be provided.
A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is available on the Internet at this address: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/p...
Yours faithfully,
Sandra Vogel
Thank you for your email message. We aim to respond to all requests under
the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and Environmental Information
Regulations 2004 within 20 working days. More information about the way we
deal with information requests is on our web site at
[1]www.merton.gov.uk/foi
Information Governance Team
London Borough of Merton.
020 8545 4634
References
Visible links
1. http://www.merton.gov.uk/foi
Dear Ms Vogel,
I am conducting the review of the Council’s response to your request for
information reference number F15872.
I have extended the time to respond to your request for review in order to
consider the application of the public interest test.
The new target date to complete my review and respond is 22^nd December
2021
Murz Marston Parchment
Lawyer, Procurement and Information Governance
South London Legal Partnership
Gifford House, 67c St Helier Avenue, Morden, SM4 6HY
DX 161030 Morden 3
[1]Sig
References
Visible links
Dear Ms Vogel,
Further to your request for an internal review please find attached my
review decision for your attention.
I do not propose to send a hard copy in the post, however should you
require this, please advise accordingly.
Murz Marston Parchment
Lawyer, Procurement and Information Governance
South London Legal Partnership
Gifford House, 67c St Helier Avenue, Morden, SM4 6HY
[1]Sig
References
Visible links
We work to defend the right to FOI for everyone
Help us protect your right to hold public authorities to account. Donate and support our work.
Donate Now