Placements in micro-flats in your Borough

The request was partially successful.

Dear Sir/Madam

Placements in micro-flats: Freedom of Information Act 2000, section 8

This request for information relates to houses in multiple occupation (HMOs) that have been converted and let using the so-called “lockdown” letting method.

The Council will no doubt be aware that in or around 2015 the Department of Communities and Local Government funded the London Lockdown Project (“the project”). The project involves 12 local authorities in London and the Association of London Environmental Health Managers (the coordinating group is chaired by the London Borough of Lambeth). The project resulted in a report to the DCLG in September 2016 (available online at: http://www.hanworth.org/wp-content/uploa...).

This followed widespread concern about a new letting phenomenon being operated by certain landlords in London whereby millions of pounds are being obtained in housing benefit by charging exorbitant rents for tiny rooms in houses which are passed off as self-contained flats. The housing benefit payable for a self-contained flat can be nearly double the rate for a room in a shared house. By exploiting this differential landlords can make £56,000 per annum via housing benefit in respect of a single house.

Typically the Lockdown method involves two storey houses being converted into six single-room dwellings with very basic, often portable, cooking facilities. It is then claimed that the units are ‘self-contained’. The rooms are not classed as HMOs for planning purposes as they come within the post-2010 permitted development rules whereby change of use from Class 3 to Class 4 does not require planning permission, unless an Article 4 Direction is in place. Sidestepping the planning regime has the practical effect of not having to comply with room size standards.

Neither are the rooms subject to mandatory licensing under Part 2 of the Housing Act 2004 as the properties used have less than three storeys. Some landlords also register as social landlords for the purpose of avoiding any additional (‘selective’) licensing scheme brought in by the local authority.

By employing the Lockdown method landlords seek to exploit loopholes in planning, housing enforcement and housing benefits legislation to house homeless and vulnerable individuals in substandard dwellings, specifically for the purpose of attracting the higher rate of housing benefit payable for self-contained dwellings.

This despite the fact that the floor space provided by the bed-sitting rooms is very much less than customarily provided, and wholly inadequate for ordinary living. The floor space of rooms is commonly between 10m2 and 12m2.

The landlords typically provide the following:
• One-room accommodation with a separate bathroom for each tenant.
• ‘Cooking facilities’ within the room that actually only consist of only a single pot plug-in Breville mini-hob and kettle.
• A shared kitchen for all persons occupying the HMO that is inadequate in size, often with a floor area of under 4m2.
• In addition to poor space standards and ergonomics, the project has identified various problems commonly encountered when dwellings are converted, including:
• Unreliable certification from private Building Control companies.
• Excessive demand on electrical circuits and sub-standard electrical installations, causing a fire risk.
• Inadequate fire safety provision.
• Hazards in kitchens, e.g. risk of burns and scalds from number of residents using the small kitchens.
• High demand on plumbing systems.
• Excessive waste, e.g. overflowing refuse bins
• Adverse impact on streets and neighbourhoods due to the high occupancy rate, and a tendency for a domino effect as landlords buy more than one property for conversion on the same street.
• Poor value for money given the significantly higher rate of housing benefit payable.
• The project confirmed that the ‘lockdown landlords’:
o “…market properties to Local Authority Homelessness Teams who are often desperate for accommodation and whose clients will usually qualify for Housing Benefit.”
• In the following request I have used the term ‘micro-flat’, which I define as:
• “A living area with a floor area of less than 16m2 or below a specified minimum employed by the local authority” (see question 1 below).

Request for information: I request the following information:

1. When securing accommodation or otherwise facilitating the acquiring of accommodation in the private sector for a person in housing need (for example when referring a person enquiring about housing to a homelessness charity), does the local authority have any policy, guidance for authority staff or established practice concerning the minimum amount of floor space area that is required for accommodation to be considered suitable?

2. If so, please forward a copy of that policy or guidance, or if merely established practice provide a comprehensive summary.

3. When securing or facilitating the provision of accommodation for persons who have applied for assistance under Part 7 of the Housing Act 1996, does the local authority have a policy, guidance for authority staff, or established practice concerning the minimum amount of floor space area that is required for accommodation to be considered suitable?

4. If so, please forward a copy of that policy or guidance, or if merely established practice provide a comprehensive summary.

5. How many persons who sought advice or assistance from the authority in relation to obtaining housing accommodation (including those advised under section 179 of the Housing Act 1996) resulted in the person obtaining micro-flat accommodation (whether or not the authority themselves directly secured that accommodation) in the following years:
a. 1 April 2015 to 31 March 2016;
b. 2016 to 2017; and
c. 1 April 2017 to 31 December 2017.

6. How many persons who applied to the authority for accommodation or assistance where the authority had reason to believe they may be homeless or threatened with homelessness (i.e. homeless applicants within the meaning of section 183(1) of the Housing Act 1996) were provided with advice or assistance that resulted in the person obtaining micro-flat accommodation or were otherwise secured micro-flat accommodation as a result of their homeless application (whether or not the authority themselves directly secured that accommodation) in the following years:
a. 1 April 2015 to 31 March 2016;
b. 2016 to 2017; and
c. 2017 to 31 December 2017.

7. How many homeless applicants were secured or were provided with advice or assistance which resulted in them obtaining privately rented accommodation in the following years:
a. 1 April 2015 to 31 March 2016;
b. 2016 to 2017; and
c. 2017 to 31 December 2017.

8. How many homeless applicants who were single person households aged 35 years or over were secured or were provided with advice or assistance which resulted in them obtaining privately rented accommodation in the following years:
a. 1 April 2015 to 31 March 2016;
b. 2016 to 2017; and
c. 2017 to 31 December 2017.

9. In respect of each of the periods referred to at (5), (6), (7) and (8), the number of cases in which the accommodation unit was inspected by the local authority before the tenancy was obtained for the purpose of evaluating the suitability of the accommodation.

10. In respect of each of the periods referred to at (5), (6), (7) and (8), the number of cases in which the homelessness/housing options service obtained a copy of the Energy Performance certificate for the property before the person obtained the tenancy.

Please be advised that I may forward a copy of this request to Elected Members in light of the adverse impact of the Lockdown model on the living conditions and welfare of homeless and vulnerable persons, the impact on the borough’s residents, and the provision of residential accommodation generally in the borough.

Many thanks for your help.

Yours faithfully

Jon Knowles

Freedom of Information, Croydon Borough Council

 

Dear Mr Knowles

 

Freedom of Information Request

 

Thank you for your recent request.

 

Your request is being considered and you will receive a response within
the statutory timescale of 20 working days, subject to the application of
any exemptions. Where consideration is being given to exemptions the 20
working day timescale may be extended to a period considered reasonable
depending on the nature and circumstances of your request. In such cases
you will be notified and, where possible, a revised time-scale will be
indicated. In all cases we shall attempt to deal with your request at the
earliest opportunity.

 

There may be a fee payable for the retrieval, collation and provision of
the information requested where the request exceeds the statutory limit or
where disbursements exceed £450. In such cases you will be informed in
writing and your request will be suspended until we receive payment from
you or your request is modified and/or reduced.

 

Your request may require either full or partial transfer to another public
authority. You will be informed if your request is transferred.

 

If we are unable to provide you with the information requested we will
notify you of this together with the reason(s) why and details of how you
may appeal (if appropriate).

 

Please note that the directorate team may contact you for further
information where we believe that the request is not significantly clear
for us to respond fully.

 

 

Yours sincerely

 

Joanne Welch-Hall

FOI Co-ordinator

Croydon Council

 

Information in relation to the London Borough of Croydon is available
at [1]http://www.croydonobservatory.org/. Also responses to previous
Freedom of Information requests can also be found on the following link

[2]https://croydondata.wordpress.com/ Council services, online, 24/7
www.croydon.gov.uk/myaccount Download our new free My Croydon app for a
faster, smarter and better way to report local issues
www.croydon.gov.uk/app From 1 October 2015, it is a legal requirement for
all privately rented properties in Croydon to be licensed. Landlords
without a licence could face fines of up to £20,000. For more information
and to apply for a licence visit www.croydon.gov.uk/betterplacetorent
Please use this web site address to view the council's e-mail disclaimer -
http://www.croydon.gov.uk/email-disclaimer

References

Visible links
1. http://www.croydonobservatory.org/
2. https://croydondata.wordpress.com/

Freedom of Information, Croydon Borough Council

1 Attachment

Dear Mr Knowles

 

Freedom of Information Request

Please see attached the council's response to your Freedom of Information
request.

Yours sincerely

 

Ahtisham Riaz

FOI Coordinator

Croydon Council

 

Council services, online, 24/7 www.croydon.gov.uk/myaccount Download our
new free My Croydon app for a faster, smarter and better way to report
local issues www.croydon.gov.uk/app From 1 October 2015, it is a legal
requirement for all privately rented properties in Croydon to be licensed.
Landlords without a licence could face fines of up to £20,000. For more
information and to apply for a licence visit
www.croydon.gov.uk/betterplacetorent Please use this web site address to
view the council's e-mail disclaimer -
http://www.croydon.gov.uk/email-disclaimer