People who are not from the only protected religion – majority group

Peter Injustice made this Freedom of Information request to Judicial Appointments Commission

This request has been closed to new correspondence from the public body. Contact us if you think it ought be re-opened.

Response to this request is long overdue. By law, under all circumstances, Judicial Appointments Commission should have responded by now (details). You can complain by requesting an internal review.

Peter Injustice

Dear Judicial Appointments Commission,
People who are not from the only protected religion – majority group

Can you please tell me under FOI how many judges are not from the only protected religious group – who can represent the majority of the English/British people.

Yours faithfully,

Peter Injustice

Thomson, Ian (JAC),

Dear Sir

 

Thank you for your email of 24^th May 2016 requesting details of how many
Judges are not for the protected religious groups.

 

Please note that the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) is an
independent public body, the sole purpose of which is to recommend
candidates for judicial appointments.

 

We do not hold the full information requested.  However since 2009, as a
producer of Official Statistics the JAC publishes the statistics for each
recruitment exercise it undertakes which includes a breakdown of gender,
ethnicity, professional background and age of candidates at the various
stages throughout the process. This is published on the JAC website and
can be accessed via the link below:

 

[1]https://jac.judiciary.gov.uk/jac-officia...

 

Statistics for sexual orientation and religious beliefs are available from
June 2014.

 

To obtain the full information requested, I would suggest you submit your
request to the Data Access and Compliance Unit of the Ministry of Justice
(MoJ)  via the online form, available through the following link:

 

[2]https://www.justice.gov.uk/information-a...

 

If you are unhappy with this response, as part of its obligations under
the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA), the JAC has an independent
review process. You may request an internal review, which will be carried
out by someone who did not make this original decision, and they will
re-assess how the JAC handled the original request. If you wish to request
an internal review, please send an e-mail within two months of this
response to:

 

[3][email address]

 

If you remain dissatisfied after the internal review, under Section 50 of
the FOIA you have the right to apply to the Information Commissioner’s
Office.

 

[4]https://www.ico.gov.uk/Global/contact_us...

 

Yours faithfully

Ian Thomson
Assistant Director HR/Business Services/Complaints
Judicial Appointments Commission
1st Floor , 102 Petty France, London, SW1H 9AJ | Tel 020 3334 5899  [mobile number]

jac.judiciary.gov.uk  | LinkedIn | Twitter |

 

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying
is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy
all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message
could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in
mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message
by e-mail.

This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be
read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not
broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

References

Visible links
1. https://jac.judiciary.gov.uk/jac-officia...
2. https://www.justice.gov.uk/information-a...
3. mailto:[email address]
4. https://www.ico.gov.uk/Global/contact_us...