Parliamentary Jurisdiction

Response to this request is long overdue. By law, under all circumstances, Ministry of Justice should have responded by now (details). You can complain by requesting an internal review.

Dear Sir or Madam,

1. What type of law does parliament have the right to make (civil law, common law, admiralty law, commercial law etc)?

2. Is there a difference between common law and judicial common law created by judges?

3. Why does common law not protect British subjects or citizens from statutes passed by parliament? To help in understanding the question: common law allows for free and unhindered travel over public land, yet statutes prevent travelling by car without permission via a driving license, car insurance, road tax payment, and DVLA registration.

4. How does parliament achieve jurisdiction over a human being born in the geographical area otherwise known as Britain thereby being able to enforce their statutes on that human being without that human beings consent, having been born free and not being a slave?

5. Is there a difference between a British subject and a British citizen?

Yours faithfully,

John Smith

Data Access & Compliance Unit, Ministry of Justice

This is an Auto Reply from the Data Access & Compliance Unit.

Thank you for your e-mail.

If your message was a request for information please be advised that your
request is being dealt with and you will receive a written acknowledgement
shortly.

Data Access & Compliance Unit

Information Directorate

Ministry of Justice
6th Floor, Zone B, Postal Point 6.23
102 Petty France
London
SW1H 9AJ

Fax: 0203 334 2245

E-mail: [email address]

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the
addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not
permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be
intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when
deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.

This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read
at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when
composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

show quoted sections

Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.

Dear Sir/Madam,

I would like to bring to your attention that a freedom of information request must be dealt with the the legally specified period unless a legal reason has been given for a delay. I hope this matter will be dealt with promptly now.

Yours sincerely,

John Smith

Data Access & Compliance Unit, Ministry of Justice

This is an Auto Reply from the Data Access & Compliance Unit.

Thank you for your e-mail.

If your message was a request for information please be advised that your
request is being dealt with and you will receive a written acknowledgement
shortly.

Data Access & Compliance Unit

Information Directorate

Ministry of Justice
6th Floor, Zone B, Postal Point 6.23
102 Petty France
London
SW1H 9AJ

Fax: 0203 334 2245

E-mail: [email address]

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the
addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not
permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be
intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when
deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.

This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read
at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when
composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

show quoted sections

Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.

Data Access & Compliance Unit, Ministry of Justice

Can you provide us with your case reference number or a copy of your
original request so that I can track the progress of the request.

Regards

Jushna Chowdhury
Data Access and Compliance Unit
6TH floor 102 Petty France.
Post point 6.25
London
SW1H 9AJ
Tele 020 3334 2710
Email [email address]

show quoted sections

Dear Ms Jushna Chowdhury,

I did not receive a case reference number. However, the questions in the original request were as follow:

1. What type of law does parliament have the right to make (civil law, common law, admiralty law, commercial law etc)?

2. Is there a difference between common law and judicial common law created by judges?

3. Why does common law not protect British subjects or citizens from statutes passed by parliament? To help in understanding the question: common law allows for free and unhindered travel over public land, yet statutes prevent travelling by car without permission via a driving license, car insurance, road tax payment, and DVLA registration.

4. How does parliament achieve jurisdiction over a human being born in the geographical area otherwise known as Britain thereby being able to enforce their statutes on that human being without that human beings consent, having been born free and not being a slave?

5. Is there a difference between a British subject and a British citizen?

Yours sincerely,

John Smith

--------------------

Data Access & Compliance Unit
Ministry of Justice

9 November 2009

Can you provide us with your case reference number or a copy of your
original request so that I can track the progress of the request.

Regards

Jushna Chowdhury
Data Access and Compliance Unit
6TH floor 102 Petty France.
Post point 6.25
London
SW1H 9AJ
Tele 020 3334 2710

Data Access & Compliance Unit, Ministry of Justice

This is an Auto Reply from the Data Access & Compliance Unit.

Thank you for your e-mail.

If your message was a request for information please be advised that your
request is being dealt with and you will receive a written acknowledgement
shortly.

Data Access & Compliance Unit

Information Directorate

Ministry of Justice
6th Floor, Zone B, Postal Point 6.23
102 Petty France
London
SW1H 9AJ

Fax: 0203 334 2245

E-mail: [email address]

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the
addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not
permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be
intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when
deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.

This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read
at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when
composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

show quoted sections

Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.

Data Access & Compliance Unit, Ministry of Justice

Thanks John, This is not a FOI request as you are not requesting
recorded information but are asking questions.
I will forward to our Policy area who will respond to the questions you
have raised.

Regards

Data Access and Compliance Unit
6TH floor 102 Petty France.
Post point 6.25
London
SW1H 9AJ

show quoted sections

J Webb (Account suspended) left an annotation ()

CORRUPT JUST-US instead of Justice

Take a look at paragraph 9.

http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/go...

Dear Sir or Madam,

Please detail the reasons why a Crown Prosecution has not been
brought against the Government of the Corporation of the United
Kingdom for Treasonous Acts as detailed below:

1. The unilateral signing of the Maastricht Treaty;
2. The unilateral signing of the Lisbon Treaty;
3. The subsequent promise of the post of the Office of the
President of Europe to Anthony Charles Lynton Blair, former Labour
Prime Minister of the Corporation of the United Kingdom;
4. The unilateral decision of Mr. Blair to abolish the Office of
the Lord Chancellor in 2003;
5. The posting of Her Majesty's Armed Forces to areas outside the
Queen's sovereign territory, and subsequent posting of foreign
troops to the Queen's sovereign territory;
6. The decision to allow the Government-in-power to appoint a
nonelected entity to assume the Office of the Prime Minister of the
corporation of the United Kingdom on 27 June 2007;
7. The continuation of the act of passing by Royal Assent (by
Commission) in the absence of the Queen, Acts of Parliament into
statutory Law, which continually and without prejudice as to social
status, erodes Common Law rights as given in several documents
including the Charter of Liberties, Magna Carta, the Bill of
Rights, the UK Constitution;
8. The continued destruction of our economy by way of debt notes,
derivatives trading, drawing of loans beyond our Nation's ability
to pay;
9. The use of our Nation's children as currency within and without
the boundaries of Her Majesty's sovereign territory without regard
to wishes and feelings of the children themselves or their parents,
and with complete disregard for the common law rights of the Child
and their parents, and the secret court system set in place to
expedite these matters in favour of the State;

All these points are provable and evidence of highly treasonous
Acts by the UK Government against her Sovereign and her People. We
The People do declare that if the Crown Prosecution Service cannot
or will not provide satisfactory explanations as to why the Crown
Prosecution Service will not act on behalf of Her Majesty and bring
the UK Government to book for its many Acts of Treason, then We The
People may have to.
Yours faithfully,

James Moore

Campbell left an annotation ()

This is a silly request by a silly so called sovereign citizen who thinks they are intelligent but are not. You don't speak for the people Mr "Moore" (dead giveaway bud) get a life and an education.