Ombudsman's salary wrongly excluded from Main Estimates - Treasury error

This request has been withdrawn by the person who made it. There may be an explanation in the correspondence below.

Dear Information Commissioner's Office,

On 29 April 2020 the PACAC Chair, William Wragg, wrote to Rob Behrens in the following terms (extract):

'The Ombudsman's salary was incorrectly excluded from the Main Estimate, resulting in an additional £196k being requested in the Supplementary Estimate. What checks are you putting in place to ensure that this error does not reoccur?'

In a letter dated 5 April 2020 (I think this should be May) Ombudsman Rob Behrens responded (extract):

'In relation to your query regarding why the Ombudsman's salary had been erroneously excluded from the Main Estimates, this was an error within HM Treasury during the CSR2015 settlement for PHSO. As a result, we have followed advice from HM Treasury to include this within the annual Supplementary Estimates until the next Comprehensive Spending Review.

Consequently, 2019/20 is the last year that this adjustment was necessary, and this amount was properly included within the 2020/21 Main Estimates. We have strengthened our working arrangements with HM Treasury to ensure this is not repeated.'

1. Please provide all information you hold regarding the error. If an investigation was carried out into the error, please provide the information contained in any document produced.

2. If the matter was considered by any PHSO committee or board, please provide copies of the minutes.

3. Please provide all information communicated to the Treasury regarding the error.

4. Please specify the financial years that the error went undetected and also the total sum involved.

Yours faithfully,

J Roberts

icoaccessinformation, Information Commissioner's Office

Thank you for contacting the Information Commissioner’s Office. We confirm
that we have received your correspondence.

If you have made a request for information held by the ICO we will contact
you as soon as possible if we need any further information to enable us to
answer your request. If we don't need any further information we will
respond to you within our published, and statutory, service levels. For
more information please visit:


If you have raised a new information rights concern - we aim to send you
an initial response and case reference number within 30 days.

If you are concerned about the way an organisation is handling your
personal information, we will not usually look into it unless you have
raised it with the organisation first. For more information please see our
webpage ‘raising a concern with an organisation’ (go to our homepage and
follow the link ‘for the public’). You can also call the number below.

If you have requested advice - we aim to respond within 14 days. 

If your correspondence relates to an existing case - we will add it to
your case and consider it on allocation to a case officer.

Copied correspondence - we do not respond to correspondence that has been
copied to us.

For more information about our services, please see our webpage ‘Service
standards and what to expect' (go to our homepage and follow the links for
‘Report a concern’ and ‘Service standards and what to expect'). You can
also call the number below.

For information about what we do with personal data see our [2]privacy

If there is anything you would like to discuss with us, please call our
helpline on 0303 123 1113.

Yours sincerely

The Information Commissioner’s Office

Our newsletter

Details of how to sign up for our monthly e-newsletter can be found


Find us on Twitter [4]here.



Visible links

Tim Turner left an annotation ()

What's the ICO's role in this?

J Roberts left an annotation ()

Thanks, it should have gone to the PHSO!

Dear icoaccessinformation,

Please withdraw this request.

Yours sincerely,

J Roberts