Novichok Detection Tests
Dear Home Office,
I believe the Home Office should have documents on Novichok toxicity and detection.
Please respond with:
1) the name of the particular Novichok agent allegedy detected in the poisoning of Sergei Viktorovich Skripal and his daughter.
2) Also the number of hospital patients who tested positive for the agent.
3) The symptoms documented with such an exposure of the particular agent alleged in Skripal;s poisoning.
4) The titles of any research papers held by Home Office scientists that identify tests for establishing Novichok in a sample.
5) The names of the tests used to establish the Novichok poisoning of the Skripals.
6) The full set of symptoms suffered by the Skripals thus far.
7) The names of research papers identifying how a sample of Novichok can be analysed to identify the site of its synthesis.
Yours faithfully,
Mark Taylor
Dear Mr. Taylor,
Thank you for contacting the Home Office with your request.
This has been assigned to a caseworker (case ref 47760). We will aim to
send you a full response by 17/04/2018 which is twenty working days from
the date we received your request.
If you have any questions then please do not hesitate to contact us.
Thank you,
N McKenzie
FOI Requests
Home Office
OFFICIAL
Dear Sirs,
Thank you for your email request.
Please find onterim response to your query attached.
Yours Sincerely
Freedom of Information
Home Office
Please do not reply to this email address. Correspondence to above email
will not be actioned.
If you wish to raise a Freedom of Information (FOI) request or related
matter, you must direct your enquiry to the Home Office Information Rights
Team at [1][Home Office request email]
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[Home Office request email]
Dear Home Office,
Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of Information reviews.
I am writing to request an internal review of Home Office's handling of my FOI request 'Novichok Detection Tests'.
The Home Office was asked some basic information about Novichok detection. Given the prominence in the news this material should easily be to hand.
The FOIA is in the public interest, in that it will allow third parties to understand Novichok detection techniques. Since such techniques could be used to create autonomous Novichok sensor systems it could allow private parties the development of products to protect the general public from Novichok attacks. There is no excuse for keeping this material secret.
A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is available on the Internet at this address: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/n...
Yours faithfully,
Mark Taylor
Dear Mr. Taylor,
Thank you for contacting the Home Office with your request for an internal review.
This has been assigned to a caseworker (case ref 47760). We will aim to send you a full response by 26/06/2018 which is twenty working days from the date we received your request.
If you have any questions then please do not hesitate to contact us.
Thank you,
M. Hassan
FoI Requests
Home Office
Please see attached in response to your Time Complaint.
Regards,
P. Zebedee
Home Office
16th Floor | Lunar House | 40, Wellesley Road | Croydon CR9 2BY
www.gov.uk/home-office
OFFICIAL
Please do not reply to this email address. Correspondence to above email
will not be actioned.
If you wish to raise a Freedom of Information (FOI) request or related
matter, you must direct your enquiry to the Home Office Information Rights
Team at [1][email address]
Dear Requester,
Thank you for your email request.
Please find response to your query attached and accept apologies for delay
in providing this response.
Yours Sincerely
Freedom of Information
Home Office
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
Kirsty Eccles (Account suspended) left an annotation ()
Running Scared....False Flag....People are awakening.
We work to defend the right to FOI for everyone
Help us protect your right to hold public authorities to account. Donate and support our work.
Donate Now
Saifur Rahman left an annotation ()
Requester should ask for internal review. They should have responded on the 14th of May. It is now the 28th.