Nicola Young, deleting files before answering FOI request.

Cathy Fox made this Freedom of Information request to Whitchurch Town Council This request has been closed to new correspondence. Contact us if you think it should be reopened.

Whitchurch Town Council did not have the information requested.

Dear Whitchurch Town Council,

Nicola Young has been fined for deliberately deleting data that should have been released under a FOI request (see below of ICO press release).
Please state her exact title.
Please state what disciplinary action the Council has taken to her, over her illegal behaviour.
Please state whether the council has taken any investigative measures to find if her action was taken under orders from others.
Please state what action the council has taken to ensure this does not happen again.
Please state why the council allowed this action to happen.
Please send a copy of the original minutes before fabrication, as well as any copy of the audio files still in existence.
Please state what the deletion policy of the council is and how it was broken.
Please state who is now the proper officer in charge of FOI reequests.
Needless to say, this request should not be process by Nicola Young as she has a conflict of interest

https://ico.org.uk/about-the-ico/news-an...
A council employee has been fined £400 for an offence under the Freedom of Information (FOI) regulations.

Nicola Young, town clerk of Whitchurch Town Council, was convicted under Section 77 of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) of deliberately obstructing records with the intent to prevent disclosure.

As part of her responsibilities as town clerk, Young was entrusted with the role of ‘proper officer’ whose responsibility it is to handle FOI requests to the council.

One such request was submitted by an individual who asked for a copy of the audio recording of a council meeting.

The requester believed that elements of the written minutes of this meeting had been fabricated, and requested the audio file to see if this was the case. They were informed that the file had already been deleted according to council policy.

A complaint was then sent by the requester to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) and, following an investigation, the ICO discovered that Young was, after initially denying it, aware of the FOI request and had deleted the audio file some days later.

On Wednesday 11 March, Young, of Shrewsbury Street, Whitchurch, Shropshire, was convicted at Crewe Magistrates after pleading guilty to blocking records with the intention of preventing disclosure and was fined £400, ordered to pay costs of £1,493 and a victim surcharge £40.

Mike Shaw, Group Manager in Enforcement at the ICO, said:

“This case is about the public’s right to know, and we will not hesitate to take action to protect people’s right to access the information they are entitled to.”

“This case emphasises the critical importance of transparency for public authorities in the way they carry out their business.”

“People should have trust and confidence that they can access public information without the danger of it being doctored, fabricated or corrupted in any way.”

Section 77 of the FOIA states a person “is guilty of an offence if he alters, defaces, blocks, erases, destroys or conceals any record held by the public authority, with the intention of preventing the disclosure by that authority of all, or any part, of the information to the communication of which the applicant would have been entitled.”

Notes to Editors
This case marks the first ever successful conviction under the FOIA.
The Information Commissioner’s Office upholds information rights in the public interest, promoting openness by public bodies and data privacy for individuals.
In addition to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the Environmental Information Regulations 2004, the ICO regulates further legislation including the Data Protection Act 2018, the General Data Protection Regulation and the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulation 2003.
The ICO called for an extension to the scope of the FOI legislation, to include private contractors carrying out public functions, in its Outsourcing Oversight? report laid before Parliament on 28 January 2019.
To report a concern to the ICO telephone our helpline 0303 123 1113 or go to ico.org.uk/concerns.

Yours faithfully,

Cathy Fox

Yours faithfully,

Cathy Fox

Mail Delivery System,

2 Attachments

  • Attachment

    attachment.delivery status

    0K Download

  • Attachment

    Freedom of Information request Nicola Young deleting files before answering FOI request..txt

    5K Download View as HTML

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.

A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:

[email address]
Unrouteable address

Sent request to Whitchurch Town Council again, using a new contact address.

Sarah Weir, Clerk, Whitchurch Town Council,

Thank you for your email which I will respond to as soon as possible.

 

If your query is urgent, please call the office which is usually open
Monday to Friday 9.30am to 1pm.

 

Kind regards

Sarah

Clerk to Whitchurch Town Council

 

Sarah Weir, Clerk, Whitchurch Town Council,

To Cathy

Please be advised that Nicola Young did not work for Whitchurch Town Council in Hampshire, so I am unable to answer any of your questions.

Kind Regards

Sarah

Mrs Sarah Weir
Town Clerk
Whitchurch Town Council

show quoted sections

Dear Sarah Weir, Clerk, Whitchurch Town Council,

Many thanks

Yours sincerely,

Cathy Fox

Matt Knight left an annotation ()

Due to an administrative error, when locating a new email address for this body, the WhatDoTheyKnow.com Admin Team inadvertently sent this request to Whitchurch Town Council, Hampshire. This is what has caused the above responses.

I've written to the requester suggesting they submit a new request, as we have now corrected our listing.

--
Matt
WhatDoTheyKnow.com Volunteer Admin Team