Module Grade Statistics
Dear University College London,
Could you please provide the average marks as well as percentage breakdowns by 10 point deciles of students taking the following modules received in the last 4 academic years (2024/23, 2023/22, 2022/21 and 2021/2020) in an excel spreadsheet format.
HPSC0017
MATH0047
STAT0005
STAT0006
STAT0023
STAT0041
MATH0048
STAT0007
STAT0011
STAT0045
Yours faithfully,
Kang Ji
If you have submitted a Freedom of Information request please accept this
email as acknowledgement that your request has been received. You should
expect a response from us within 20 working days.
For details on how we use your personal information, please see UCL's
general privacy
notice: [1]www.ucl.ac.uk/legal-services/privacy/general-privacy-notice
Data Protection Office
Office of General Counsel
References
Visible links
1. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/legal-services/pri...
Dear Kang,
Thank you for your request for information made under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) 2000.
We confirm that we do hold information of the description specified in
your request; please see our response below and attached.
Your request
Could you please provide the average marks as well as percentage
breakdowns by 10 point deciles of students taking the following modules
received in the last 4 academic years (2024/23, 2023/22, 2022/21 and
2021/2020) in an excel spreadsheet format.
HPSC0017
MATH0047
STAT0005
STAT0006
STAT0023
STAT0041
MATH0048
STAT0007
STAT0011
STAT0045
Our response
Please see our response attached. Please also note the following:
• If a module does not appear for one of the years, this means that
nobody took the module that year.
• Exact numbers of students totalling 5 or fewer have been withheld.
This is because to provide the exact numbers may inadvertently lead to
the identification of these individuals. Whilst there are no
personally identifiable details within the data being withheld, that
data, when combined with other data that may already be available in
the public domain, could be used by ‘motivated intruders’ and other
knowledgeable third parties to identify the individuals concerned.
Linking together separate strands of data available in this way can
indirectly lead to an individual being identified which would breach
the first data protection principle. Further, these individuals would
have no expectation that their identities, by virtue of disclosing
this type of information, would be made known to the wider public and
it would be considered unfair to do so.
As this data would be likely to become personal data, this information is
exempt from disclosure and has been withheld under section 40(2) of the
FOIA by virtue of s40(3A)(a). Section 40(2) of the FOIA allows a public
authority to withhold information under the FOIA where (i) the requested
information is personal data relating to someone other than the requester
and (ii) its disclosure would breach any of the data protection
principles. It is for these reasons that this information is exempt under
section 40(2) of the Act. As the section 40(2) exemption is absolute,
there is no need to conduct a public interest test.
You are free to use any information supplied for your own use, including
for non-commercial research purposes. The information may also be used for
the purposes of news reporting. However, any other type of re-use, for
example by publishing or issuing copies to the public, will require the
permission of the copyright owner.
If you have any queries or concerns, please contact me using the details
provided in this letter and including the request reference number. If you
are unhappy with our response to your request and wish to make a complaint
or request a review of our decision, please email [1][email address].
Emails should include the words ‘Internal Review’ in the subject and be
marked ‘For the Attention of the Vice-President (Operations)’.
Alternatively, please write to:
Vice-President (Operations)
University College London
Gower Street
London
WC1E 6BT
Please note that complaints and requests for internal review received more
than two months after the initial decision will not be handled.
If you are not content with the outcome of the internal review, you may
apply directly to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) by using the
following web address: [2]www.ico.org.uk/foicomplaints or by writing to
the ICO at the following address:
Wycliffe House
Water Lane
Wilmslow
SK9 5AF
0303 123 1113
[3]https://ico.org.uk/
You should do this within two months of our final decision. Further
information on the FOIA is available on the ICO’s website:
[4]https://ico.org.uk/for-the-public/offici....
Kind regards,
Gladys Mandangu
Data Protection and Freedom of Information Administrator
Data Protection Office
Office of the General Counsel
University College London
Tel: 020 80168488 (ext. 68488)
Email: [5][email address]
Confidentiality and Legal Privilege: The contents of this email and its
attachment(s) are confidential to the intended recipient and may be
legally privileged. They are not to be disclosed, copied, forwarded, used
or relied upon by any person other than the intended addressee. If you
believe that you have received the e-mail and its attachment(s) in error,
you must not take any action based on them and you must not copy or show
them to anyone. Please respond to the sender and delete this email and its
attachment(s) from your system.
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[email%20address]
2. https://url.uk.m.mimecastprotect.com/s/L...
3. https://ico.org.uk/
4. https://url.uk.m.mimecastprotect.com/s/R...
5. mailto:[email%20address]
We work to defend the right to FOI for everyone
Help us protect your right to hold public authorities to account. Donate and support our work.
Donate Now