MOD evidence that any other exposure other than experimental vaccines caused epedemic levels of chronic autoimmune sickness in troops( Now veterans)

Response to this request is long overdue. By law, under all circumstances, Ministry of Defence should have responded by now (details). You can complain by requesting an internal review.

Dear Ministry of Defence,

Over the last 2 years a team of Veterans supported by investigators and legals have scoured through the thousands of Global documents/links in reference to getting to the bottom of epedemic levels of chronic autoimmune illnesses in Gulf War troops (Veterans) 90/91.

The reason we carried out these latest fresh and thorough investigations, was that documents that MOD previously accidentally misplaced? appeared in veterans medical file when it was requested in 2018, new evidence arriving on the global stage 'The Italian Study' into multiple vaccinations causing autoimmune conditions and the knowledge along with evidence that the so called comparison Gulf War vaccination report carried out and released in 2006 was CORRUPT data, as it was not the same vaccines administered in the same time periods as administered in the Gulf War 90/91. So we became 'AWARE' within the last 3 years. Thus the reason to delve deeper into MOD and Global data. By quite a simple process of elimination we are left with the experimental multiple vaccine regime that caused the epedemic levels of sickness!

Below are the FACTS.

The overwhelming evidence surrounding the experimental vaccine regime is DAMNING.

Irrelevant to whether troops were boots were on the sand, in the air, on ships at sea or not even deployed into theatre at all! The epedemic levels of chronic sickness are found wherever the experimental vaccine regime was present!
This CANNOT be said for ANY other exposure that MOD may have mentioned, including pesticide, smoke from burning oil rigs, low level sarin and depleted Uranium.
Not forgetting that the other 31 Nations were exposed to these exposures and are not suffering epedemic levels of sickness.

The epedemic levels of sickness is ONLY present in the 5 Nations that subjected its troops to the experimental vaccine regime. UK, U.S, Denmark, Canada and Australia. These are also the ONLY 5 Nations to each produce a government report on the epedemic sickness in their troops (mentioning the other 4 suffering Nations within the reports). None of the 31 remaining unvaccinated Nations have documented epedemic levels (30%+) in a report or in any shape or form.

The other 31 Nations that did not subject their troops to the experimental vaccine regime are not suffering epedemic levels of sickness.

As stated earlier this information has been collated over the last 2 years from March 2018 until the present day!

MOD has stated through foi in last 2 years, that they stopped researching Gulf War illness, however they continue to monitor Global information/research surrounding Gulf War Illness. If this is true (We strongly doubt it) MOD would have simply come to the same conclusion. We believe MOD came to this conclusion over 20 years ago and did their upmost to conceal it! With following administrations til the present day (possibly unaware) regurgitating the same old corrupted data.

Question -

Has MOD carried out ANY investigations since the CORRUPT report in 2006 to Surrounding epedemic levels of Sickness in Gulf War Veterans. Is MOD still relying on this as well as the CORRUPTED countermeasures report?

Please DO NOT INSULT VETERANS BY LINKING THEM TO THESE CORRUPT REPORTS, simply answer a simple question. MOD have either carried out investigations since 2006 or NOT?


gavin roberts
on behalf of

SG SecFin-Sec Gp Mailbox (MULTIUSER), Ministry of Defence

1 Attachment

Dear Mr Roberts,
Please see the attached.


Joint Medical Group

show quoted sections

Dear SG SecFin-Sec Gp Mailbox (MULTIUSER),

I/We believe this is a reasonable request, giving the background information to the best of our knowledge and requesting to see any data between 2006 until the present day? With the MOD claiming to monitor global data of Gulf War Illness over the last 15 years, then if there is no data of anybody doing anything at any time. Then this simply cannot be true! Weekly, Monthly, annual records of the monitoring? This is not vexacious at all. Veterans are entitled to know if any data exists or not? Following the solicited 2006 countermeasures report until the present day. Total of Hours , days and dates when the monitoring took place and by how many staff. What are the future monitoring plans (man hours, which dates etc) . You have have requested for it to be put back to you in the first instance. If you still refuse to supply data or state no data exists, please put forward to an internal review.


gavin roberts

Dear Ministry of Defence,

I have not received a response to this foi.
Following 2 years of investigations and study
We can prove that the multiple experimental vaccines caused the epidemic levels of sickness/autoimmune conditions in our Gulf War Veterans. Have MOD any hard evidence whatsoever that it was another exposure on it's own or combined with another exposure? Or are they still simply reliant hopeful on assumptions? If so where is this evidence/data?


gavin roberts

Dear SG SecFin-Sec Gp Mailbox (MULTIUSER),

I'm replying in the first instance as requested

MOD have had 30 years now to be able to prove their theory it was a combination of 2 or mor exposures as the cause of the epidemic levels of sickness in our troops. That is plenty of time to prove a theory. Can MOD prove it? What data do you have to prove it? Have MOD even bothered to test the different exposures with each other? We dont believe MOD have. We believe MOD didnt need to test the different exposures, because they already knew the cause. In contrast Veterans have left no stone unturned during our investigations. Something that MOD told us they were doing/would do. As far as we can see that was not done or MOD would have come up with the same conclusion as the Veterans have!

Veterans require to know the answer to this question, as we would not wish to waste the Justice/Courts time if MOD have actually got some evidence some where to back their theory up that they would like to put on the table so to speak?

Is what is in the UK/global public domain all MOD has to rely on to back what is at best an assumption up?
The reason this question is being asked is Veterans can now prove that it was the multiple experimental vaccine regime subjected to troops that caused the epidemic levels of sickness (autoimmune conditions). The information surrounding the vaccines was corrupted in the 90's and there has been a cover up since. We can prove it.

To clarify the question once more to MOD in a simple format

Apart from the classified data that was due for release between 2016 -2018 that has since been classified for a further 37 -75 years! the data MOD lost/destroyed during and post 90/91 including documents surrounding vaccines, medical docs, troops personal medical docs and finally the UK/Global data in public domain that have been provided through links.

Q - Is that really all you have to back up what can be best described as an untested frail assumption ?


gavin roberts

Dear SG SecFin-Sec Gp Mailbox (MULTIUSER),

Still no response as required by law, allow me to clarify. It is ok MOD saying it could be this or ot could be that! Where is the data that tested these theories?


gavin roberts

Dear Ministry of Defence,

Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of Information reviews.

I am writing to request an internal review of Ministry of Defence's handling of my FOI request 'MOD evidence that any other exposure other than experimental vaccines caused epedemic levels of chronic autoimmune sickness in troops( Now veterans)'.

It is quite obvious why an internal review is being requested. MOD are simply not responding as required by LAW. The past Corruption & Cover up is blatantly obvious! MOD have in the past claimed it is unfounded on several occasions in the media. We present it crystal clear in black and white. MOD go quiet and disrespect veterans further by not even responding , again working outside of the LAW!

We have given MOD plenty of time as they have requested for Covid. Is the silence finally the admittance to Corruption &Cover up because it is deafening.

Look forward to some kind of response from, someone with that can match veterans integrity, honesty and honour.

The Game is up!

Gavin Roberts

Dear Ministry of Defence,

Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of Information reviews.

I am writing to request an internal review of Ministry of Defence's handling of my FOI request 'MOD evidence that any other exposure other than experimental vaccines caused epedemic levels of chronic autoimmune sickness in troops( Now veterans)'.

Simply not providing the data of all the monitoring (That MOD claimed was and is carried out)records that MOD have carried out in Ref to Gulf War illnesses over the past 15 years. The number of personnel involved and total hours invested each month/ year?
Who is responsible etc? What is the job description whilst carrying out monitoring?

Also not responding within timescales as required by Law. Having replied in the 1st instance directly to them, as they request.

A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is available on the Internet at this address:


gavin roberts

CIO-FOI-IR (MULTIUSER), Ministry of Defence

Dear Mr Roberts,


Thank you for your emails to this office, received during September and
October which relate to the following requests:


MOD evidence that any other exposure other than experimental vaccines
caused epedemic levels of chronic autoimmune sickness in troops( Now



Pertusis date of purchase and supplier for the titles Vaccine Interaction
Research 2005/2006



Adjuvants in Experimental vaccine combinations Gulf War 90/91



Vaccine Data Used in 2005/2006 Research



Please be assured that the Department is aware of your outstanding
requests and we have been advised that responses will be sent to you, but
we are currently unable to provide you with a timescale.


Unfortunately, we are not in a position to conduct substantive internal
reviews into the handling of these requests until final responses have
been provided to you. It does, however, appear that MOD has failed to
respond to a number of requests within 20 working days and has therefore
breached section 10 of the FOI Act. We apologise for any inconvenience
caused by the delays that you have experienced.


Should you remain dissatisfied with the responses when they are provided
to you, please contact us again.


Under the FOI Act, you have an absolute right to appeal to the Information
Commissioner under the provisions of section 50 of the Act regardless of
whether the public authority concerned has provided a response or
completed an internal review.



MOD Information Rights Compliance Team


Visible links


We would just like to add that MOD are responding to to others and their requests within the normal timescales???Please explain why it is sick Gulf War Veterans are not only NOT being prioritised, but are being discriminated against delaying for months? We can't think of another cohort of veterans dealing with corruptions & Cover ups or any other that could possibly be now in front of us in a queue for data. Are current MOD struggling to match veterans standards and values of integrity?
All we ask is for honesty, transparency and work within the LAWS of the land. We feel this is not too much to ask for.

Kind Regards,

Gavin Roberts
On behalf of Sick Gulf War veterans and the families of the fallen.