Misusing police resources (and position) to harass/stitch-up members of the public
Dear Humberside Police,
1) What measures are in place to prevent officers abusing their position by committing police resources to harass/stitch-up etc., members of the public who have got on the wrong side of officers serving with Humberside police, for example, by exposing corruption/misconduct?
2) What position of seniority would an officer serving with Humberside police need to hold for it to be feasible for him/her to be successful in carrying out this kind of abuse?
Yours faithfully,
H J Wilson
Thank you for your request for information. If you are requesting
information under the Freedom of Information Act or the Environmental
Information Regulations you will receive a response within the statutory
20 working days.
We aim to respond to any other enquiries within 20 working days. Further
information on requesting information can be found on this [1]link.
Internet Email should not be treated as a secure means of communication.
To ensure regulatory compliance Humberside Police monitors all Internet
Email activity and content. This communication is intended for the
addressee(s) only. Unauthorised use or disclosure of the content may be
unlawful. If you are not a named addressee, you must not disclose, copy,
print, or in any other way use or rely on the data contained in this
transmission. If received in error you should notify the sender
immediately and delete this Email Humberside Police routinely checks
e-mails for computer viruses. However addressees are advised to conduct
their own virus checks of all e-mails, & any attachments). Opinions
expressed in this document may not be official policy. Thank you for your
co-operation. Humberside Police
References
Visible links
1. http://www.humberside.police.uk/your-rig...
Dear H J Wilson
Thank you for your request concerning offices abusing their position to harass stitch up members of public.
Section 8(1)(b) of the FOIA requires that a request for information must include the real name of the requester. If the requester; fails to provide a name; can’t be identified from the name provided (for example because they have only used their first name or initials); or, is using an obvious pseudonym, then the request won’t meet the requirements of section 8(1)(b) and will technically be invalid.
For a request to be valid, the requester must provide enough of their real name to give anyone reading that request a reasonable indication of their identity. This means that if the staff processing the request cannot identify the requester from the name provided, that request will be invalid.
Whilst it is not routine that we would seek identification, we have determined that that on this occasion owing to similarities to previous requests we require your identification to proceed with these requests.
Once in receipt we will deal with your requests, should you need to discuss this further please do not hesitate to contact me.
Yours sincerely
Angela Clement| Senior Information Compliance Officer| Humberside Police |
Tel: 01482 340669 (3669) | Email: [email address]
We work to defend the right to FOI for everyone
Help us protect your right to hold public authorities to account. Donate and support our work.
Donate Now
H J Wilson left an annotation ()
A police force which routinely resorts to citing Section 8(1)(b) to avoid dealing with a request is so obviously up to no good.