Mental health budget decisions

Andy Fugard made this Freedom of Information request to Her Majesty's Treasury

This request has been closed to new correspondence from the public body. Contact us if you think it ought be re-opened.

The request was refused by Her Majesty's Treasury.

Dear Madam/Sir,

Blame for insufficient mental healthcare funding has been passed around between Department of Health, NHS England, and individual Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs), however, the source of funding is the Treasury. Although CCGs and other mediating organisations make decisions about how much funding mental health receives, this is as a proportion of budgets decided at Treasury level. Any budgetary planning at Treasury level must therefore take mental health into consideration, alongside other areas of healthcare.

I am writing to request:

(i) names of individuals at Treasury and above, including advisors by official name or function, who are responsible for decisions made in relation to mental health care budgets;

(ii) documentation on budgetary decisions made, including evidence of how, in calculating the total health budget, mental health needs have been taken into consideration.

Yours faithfully,

Andy Fugard

Enquiries, CEU - HMT, Her Majesty's Treasury

Dear Mr Fugard
Thank you for your Freedom of Information request. I write to confirm receipt of your request and to let you know that it is receiving attention. If you have any enquiries regarding your request do not hesitate to contact us.

Please Note: HM Treasury has a dedicated email address for the public to make FOI requests, [HM Treasury request email].

Kind regards

Correspondence and Information Rights Team | Corporate Centre Group | 3rd Floor Red Zone | HM Treasury, 1 Horse Guards Rd, London, SW1A 2HQ |
Please consider the environment before printing this email.

show quoted sections

Dear Mohammad,

Sorry to email again, but I'm told by law I should have received a response within 20 working days, which have now passed.

Can I be of any assistance in clarifying my request?

Many thanks,

Andy Fugard

FOI Requests, Her Majesty's Treasury

1 Attachment

Dear Mr Fugard,


Please find attached a response to your FOI request.


Many thanks,




John Sparrow
Information Rights Unit| HM Treasury, 1 Horse Guards Road, SW1A 2HQ



This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the
use of the individual(s) to whom they are addressed. If you are not the
intended recipient and have received this email in error, please notify
the sender and delete the email. This footnote also confirms that our
email communications may be monitored to ensure the secure and effective
operation of our systems and for other lawful purposes, and that this
email has been swept for malware and viruses.

show quoted sections

Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.

Dear Mr Sparrow,

Thank you for your reply. It was helpful to learn more about the networks of responsibility and receive confirmation that Treasury "does hold information in scope" of my request.

I have three follow up questions, if I may?

1. Are you able to say more about the types of information held without harming Ministerial communications? For example, is there any advice on the involvement and capacity of voluntary services to provide mental health care? On the different types of NHS mental health professional?

2. Can you say more about who has advised Ministers, e.g., what departments outside Treasury were involved. May any individuals be named?

3. What about the nature of statistical evidence that was used to make decisions. For example, does it include prevalence data? Outcomes data? What costs data were used?

I'd be grateful for any further information or clues about the processes.

Best wishes,