Thank you for your email.  

Please note, if you are sending an automated request for personal data
erasure via a third-party, before we can proceed with your request we
require a copy of your ID, scanned copy of a driving licence/passport.

If your enquiry is related to a current application to study at King's
please contact the relevant admissions team directly:

[1]https://www.kcl.ac.uk/aboutkings/orgstru...

For all other enquiries relating to requests made under the Freedom of
Information Act (2000), the Environmental Information Regulations (2004),
or the Data Protection Act and UK GDPR (2018) a member of the Information
Compliance team will be in touch separately with official acknowledgement
of your request.

Kind regards,

Information Compliance

References

Visible links
1. https://www.kcl.ac.uk/aboutkings/orgstru...
https://www.kcl.ac.uk/aboutkings/orgstru...

Dear Freya,
 
Thank you for your email. We will treat your request for information as a request under the Freedom of Information Act 2000, received by the university on 10th September 2023. We will endeavour to respond to your request within the statutory 20 working day time frame.
 
Please note that the university has adopted the Model Publication Scheme and also publishes FOI responses on our Disclosure Log. The Fees Regulations state that requests received within 60 consecutive working days can be aggregated.

Kind Regards,

Lakeisha Dowsey-Magog (she/her)
Information Compliance Officer
Department of Business Assurance
King’s College London
Room: SW1.09
Somerset House East Wing
Strand Campus
WC2R 2LS

show quoted sections

Dear Freya,  

 

Request for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (“the
Act”)

 

Further to your recent request for information held by King’s College
London, I am writing to confirm that the requested information is held in
part by the university.

 

Your request

 

We received your information request on 10^th September 2023 and have
treated it as a request for information made under section 1(1) of the
Act.

 

You requested the following information:

 

I am requesting information regarding contextual applications to the
Medicine A100 course. I would like this information for 2021, 2022 and
2023 entry.

 

1) What was the average UCAT score from all contextual applicants who
applied for 2021/22/23 entry?

2) What was the average UCAT score invited to interview from contextual
applicants for 2021/22/23 entry?

3) What was the minimum UCAT score for contextual applicants who were
invited to interview for 2021/22/23 entry?

4) What was the number of contextual applicants for 2021/22/23 entry and
what percentage/number of those applicants were offered an interview?

5) Of the contextual students who received interviews for 2021/22/23
entry, what percentage/number got an offer?

 

Our response

 

Please Note: Data presented by UCAS cycle.

 

 1. What was the average UCAT score from all contextual applicants who
applied for 2021/22/23 entry?

 

2021 – 2648

2022 – 2650

 

 2. What was the average UCAT score invited to interview from contextual
applicants for 2021/22/23 entry?

 

2021 – 2890

2022 – 2857

 

 3. What was the minimum UCAT score for contextual applicants who were
invited to interview for 2021/22/23 entry?

 

2021 – 2390

2022 – 2380

 

 4. What was the number of contextual applicants for 2021/22/23 entry and
what percentage/number of those applicants were offered an interview?

 

Percentages can be deduced from the numbers provided in response to 4) and
5):

 

Number of contextual applicants

 

2021 – 1314

2022 – 971

 

Number of contextual invitees to interview

 

2021 – 438

2022 – 319

 

5) Of the contextual students who received interviews for 2021/22/23
entry, what percentage/number got an offer?

 

Number of contextual offer-holders

 

2021 – 322

2022 – 150

 

The University can confirm it holds some of the requested data for the
2023/24 academic year, however, this information has been withheld in
accordance with section 43(2) of the Freedom of Information Act –
Commercial Interests.  

  

Student recruitment has been recognised as a commercial activity for
universities (see ICO decision notice:
[1]https://ico.org.uk/media/action-weve-tak...).
Since the UK government removed caps on the number of students
institutions could accept from 2015/16, King’s College London (KCL), must
operate within an increasingly competitive global market to continue to
attract the best students. Consequently, Higher Education Providers (HEPs)
such as King’s must recognise the impact these dynamics are having in
conferring elevated or additional commercial value on certain internal
information around recruitment. 

   

We consider that the records we hold in this regard are exempt under
Section 43(2) as disclosure would be likely to prejudice the commercial
interests of King’s College University. Disclosure of information to this
level, at this point in the admissions cycle, would likely harm the
ability of KCL to compete with other providers in the management of their
admissions decisions and offer making. The College acknowledges the public
interest in a healthy and competitive market place. However, disclosure of
information which would be likely to undermine the competitiveness of
King’s by allowing competitors to gain access to key information about our
programmes, their level of interest and take up, exposing demand and
provision. Other HEPs would be likely to use this information to inform
their marketing strategies in the following cycle; more aggressively
targeting specific areas perceived as weak. They would be likely to use
this commercial intelligence to see areas which are over and under
subscribed and target their recruitment accordingly. This would be likely
to impact on the College’s number and quality of applicants, undermining
its ability to compete in the sector. 

  

This is a qualified exemption and requires the consideration of a public
interest test: assessing whether the balance of the public interest
favours disclosing the information or maintaining the exemption. In this
case we have considered that the public interest favours non-disclosure.
It is in the public interest for the university to be able to fairly
attract best candidates and maintain its position as a world leading
university.   

 

This completes the university’s response to your information request.

 

Your right to complain

 

If you are unhappy with the service you have received in relation to your
information request or feel that it has not been properly handled you have
the right to complain or request a review of our decision by contacting
the Director of Information Governance & Data Protection Officer within 60
days of the date of this letter.  

 

Further information about our internal complaints procedure is available
at the link below: 

[2]http://www.kcl.ac.uk/college/policyzone/...

 

In the event that you are not content with the outcome of your complaint
you may apply to the Information Commissioner for a decision. Generally,
the Information Commissioner cannot make a decision unless you have
exhausted the internal complaints procedure provided by King’s College
London.

 

The Information Commissioner can be contacted at the following address:

The Information Commissioner’s Office

Wycliffe House

Water Lane

Wilmslow

Cheshire

SK9 5AF

 

Yours sincerely,

 

Lakeisha Dowsey-Magog (she/her)

Information Compliance Officer

Department of Business Assurance

King’s College London

Room: SW1.09

Somerset House East Wing

Strand Campus

WC2R 2LS

 

References

Visible links
1. https://ico.org.uk/media/action-weve-tak...
2. http://www.kcl.ac.uk/college/policyzone/...