Location of all mobile phone masts in the UK, as shown by the sitefinder database.
Dear Office of Communications,
I refer partially to an earlier request for this information, as detailed in the exchange below.
Specifically, a response by Alex Bevan of your organisation on the 5th of September 2008, that you could not provide this information as required to by the high court, after your appeal to it on the Information commissioners decision that you must publish failed, and that you were considering a further appeal.
I can find no public details of a subsequent appeal.
If this occurred, what was the verdict?
If this did not occur, could you please release the data.
Ideally this would be in the form of a simple spreadsheet or CSV file, of all information held on each cell site, with latitude/longitude.
Dear Mr Stirling
Thank you for your request for information about the dataset behind the Sitefinder database.
The case you refer to in your email has progressed through the Administrative Court, Court of Appeal, and most recently, the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court referred the case to the European Court of Justice, where it is currently awaiting a date for a hearing.
You may find it useful to refer to the Supreme Court's Press Summary for the case, available here:
You may also find useful the Supreme Court's full judgement, available here:
As the case is still of the subject of ongoing court proceedings, Ofcom is not obliged to provide the dataset.
Please ensure that when using the provided information in any way, you comply with all relevant legislation. For example, the information provided may be protected by copyright under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended). If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice. For Ofcom’s policy on copyright and related issues, please refer to http://www.ofcom.org.uk/disclaimer.
If you have any queries about this email, please contact me. Please remember to quote the reference number 1-158921521 in any future communications.
This email is sent as routine correspondence from the Information Requests Team and has not been treated as a response to a request for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. If you think it should, please let us know.