Lists of Accessible Taxis under S167 Equality Act 2010

The request was successful.

Dear Glasgow City Council,

1) Please advise if you have produced, or currently intend to produce, a list of wheelchair accessible:
a) taxis
and
b) private hire vehicles
under the powers set out in S167 of the Equality Act 2010.

2) Please identify how many a) taxi and b) PHV drivers have applied for medical / physical impairment exemption under S166 of the Equality Act 2010 since S166 was commenced. If you've created a list under S167, please identify how many of the exemptions were in place before S167 and how many have been put in since.

3) Please state whether you voluntarily compiled a list of accessible taxis and private hire vehicles following the Department for Transport's guidance of 15th September 2010, which stated, in relation to section 167, “although the list of designated vehicles will have no actual effect in law until the duties are commenced, we would urge licensing authorities to start maintaining a list as soon as possible for the purpose of liaising with the trade and issuing exemption certificates”. If you did produce such a voluntary list, please indicate when you did so, and provide the current list.

If you have produced a list of wheelchair accessible taxis and/or private hire vehicles under S167, or are going to, please tell me the following.

4) The date the list was instated or by which you intend to do so.

5) The accessibility requirements of a taxi for it to appear on the list.

6) How you intend to enforce drivers' compliance with S165.

7) The list.

Yours faithfully,

Doug Paulley

Customer Care Centre, Glasgow City Council

New Service Request was submitted: RQST00006126141
You can simply reply to this Email, and your reply
will automatically be associated with this Service Request

-----Original Message-----
Dear Glasgow City Council,

1) Please advise if you have produced, or currently intend to produce, a list of wheelchair accessible:
a) taxis
and
b) private hire vehicles
under the powers set out in S167 of the Equality Act 2010.

2) Please identify how many a) taxi and b) PHV drivers have applied for medical / physical impairment exemption under S166 of the Equality Act 2010 since S166 was commenced. If you've created a list under S167, please identify how many of the exemptions were in place before S167 and how many have been put in since.

3) Please state whether you voluntarily compiled a list of accessible taxis and private hire vehicles following the Department for Transport's guidance of 15th September 2010, which stated, in relation to section 167, ¿although the list of designated vehicles will have no actual effect in law until the duties are commenced, we would urge licensing authorities to start maintaining a list as soon as possible for the purpose of liaising with the trade and issuing exemption certificates¿. If you did produce such a voluntary list, please indicate when you did so, and provide the current list.

If you have produced a list of wheelchair accessible taxis and/or private hire vehicles under S167, or are going to, please tell me the following.

4) The date the list was instated or by which you intend to do so.

5) The accessibility requirements of a taxi for it to appear on the list.

6) How you intend to enforce drivers' compliance with S165.

7) The list.

Yours faithfully,

Doug Paulley

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #402177 email]

Is [Glasgow City Council request email] the wrong address for Freedom of Information requests to Glasgow City Council? If so, please contact us using this form:
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/change_re...

Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/offi...

For more detailed guidance on safely disclosing information, read the latest advice from the ICO:
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/ico-...

If you find this service useful as an FOI officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Glasgow - UK Council of the Year 2015
Disclaimer:
This email is from Glasgow City Council or one of its Arm’s Length Organisations (ALEOs). Views expressed in this message do not necessarily reflect those of the council, or ALEO, who will not necessarily be bound by its contents. If you are not the intended recipient of this email (and any attachment), please inform the sender by return email and destroy all copies. Unauthorised access, use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. Please be aware that communication by internet email is not secure as messages can be intercepted and read by someone else. Therefore, we strongly advise you not to email any information, which if disclosed to someone else, would be likely to cause you distress. If you have an enquiry of this nature then please write to us using the postal system. If you chose to email this information to us there can be no guarantee of privacy. Any email including its content may be monitored and used by the council, or ALEO, for reasons of security and for monitoring internal compliance with the office policy on staff use. Email monitoring or blocking software may also be used. Please be aware that you have a responsibility to make sure that any email you write or forward is within the bounds of the law. Glasgow City Council, or ALEOs, cannot guarantee that this message or any attachment is virus free or has not been intercepted and amended. You should perform your own virus checks.

hide quoted sections

FOI_CCT, Glasgow City Council

1 Attachment

Dear Mr Paulley

 

Thank you for your email received on 19 April 2017 requesting information
under the Freedom of Information Act.

 

Please find attached your response.

 

Yours sincerely

 

 

 

Freedom of Information Team

Chief Executive’s Department

 

Glasgow - UK Council of the Year 2015
Disclaimer:
This email is from Glasgow City Council or one of its Arm’s Length
Organisations (ALEOs). Views expressed in this message do not necessarily
reflect those of the council, or ALEO, who will not necessarily be bound
by its contents. If you are not the intended recipient of this email (and
any attachment), please inform the sender by return email and destroy all
copies. Unauthorised access, use, disclosure, storage or copying is not
permitted. Please be aware that communication by internet email is not
secure as messages can be intercepted and read by someone else. Therefore,
we strongly advise you not to email any information, which if disclosed to
someone else, would be likely to cause you distress. If you have an
enquiry of this nature then please write to us using the postal system. If
you chose to email this information to us there can be no guarantee of
privacy. Any email including its content may be monitored and used by the
council, or ALEO, for reasons of security and for monitoring internal
compliance with the office policy on staff use. Email monitoring or
blocking software may also be used. Please be aware that you have a
responsibility to make sure that any email you write or forward is within
the bounds of the law. Glasgow City Council, or ALEOs, cannot guarantee
that this message or any attachment is virus free or has not been
intercepted and amended. You should perform your own virus checks.

Martyn Dewar left an annotation ()

Doug -

On the point of Glasgow the hackney operators have 100% wheelchair accessibility, albeit, you do, of course, pay the privilege there in comparison to a PHV.

http://www.glasgowtaxis.co.uk/passenger-...

At least two of the Private hire companies also have some WAVs, either in the form of a conventional WAV (Network, who hold the NHS and Glasgow school contracts), or a hackney (Hampden)- the latter, however, carry the same tariff as the more common hackney provider so you would probably want to bear that in mind if making an advance booking as the majority of the vehicles both of those operators have are not accessible.

Doug Paulley left an annotation ()

Thank you