Dear British Broadcasting Corporation,
1. How many complaints have been received to date about Laura Kuenssberg's question/s to President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Theresa May ?
2. What were the complaints?
Prime documents ( see notes below) if possible within the time constraint , BBC form of categorisation if not.
3 What was the cost of sending Laura Kuenssberg to the USA?
4. What was the cost of sending the BBC crew who attended the press conference to USA?
3/4 nb Total cost - including expenses
Request Title/summary within scope.
I am writing to make an open government request for all the
information to which I am entitled under the Freedom of Information
Please send me recorded information, which includes information
held on computers, in emails and in printed or handwritten
documents as well as images, video and audio recordings.
If this request is too wide or unclear, and you require a
clarification, I would be grateful if you could contact me as I
understand that under the Act, you are required to advise and
assist requesters.(Section 16 / Regulation 9).
If my request is denied in whole or in part, I ask that you justify
all deletions by reference to specific exemptions of the act. I
will also expect you to release all non-exempt material. I reserve
the right to appeal your decision to withhold any information or to
charge excessive fees.
If any of this information is already in the public domain, please
can you direct me to it, with page references and URLs if
Please confirm or deny whether the requested information is held ( section (Section 1(1)(a) and consider whether information should be provided under section 1(1)(b), or whether it is subject to an exemption in Part II of the Act.
If the release of any of this information is prohibited on the
grounds of breach of confidence, I ask that you supply me with
copies of the confidentiality agreement and remind you that
information should not be treated as confidential if such an
agreement has not been signed.
I request that the response be provided to me as
electronic copies, via WDTK.
The information should be immediately readable - and, as a freedom of Information request, not put in a PDF or any closed form, which some readers may not be able to access. It should be immediately readable.
I understand that you are required to respond to my request within
the 20 working days after you receive this letter. I would be
grateful if you could confirm in writing that you have received
Please consider the ICO's Decision on the provision original documents on file, rather than newly written letters of response.
This request does not require a letter, drafted by the External Affairs department, or any other written input by reputational defence employees - and purporting to be the response to a FOIA request.
Dear Jt Oakley
Thank you for your request for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000, as detailed in your email below. Your request was received on 31st January 2017. We will deal with your request as promptly as possible, and at the latest within 20 working days. If you have any queries about your request, please contact us at the address below.
The reference number for your request is RFI20170223
The Information Policy & Compliance Team
BBC Freedom of Information
BC2 B6, Broadcast Centre
201 Wood Lane
London W12 7TP
Email: [BBC request email]
Tel: 020 8008 2882
Dear JT Oakley,
Please find attached the response to your request for information,
The Information Policy and Compliance Team
Workplace & Information Rights, BBC Legal
BC2A4, Broadcast Centre
201 Wood Lane
London W12 7TP, UK
Email: mailto:[BBC request email]
Tel: 020 8008 2882
Fax: 020 8008 2398
2. mailto:[BBC request email]
Dear FOI Enquiries,
Thank you. You state:.
The limited application of the Act to public service broadcasters is to protect freedom of expression and the rights of the media, guaranteed under Article 10 European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”). The BBC, as a media organisation, is under a duty to impart information and ideas on all matters of public interest and the importance of this function has been recognised by the European Court of Human Rights. Maintaining our editorial independence is a crucial factor in enabling the media to fulfil this function.
Since the BBC has now been barred from USA presidential conferences, my contention is that the request comes within a public interest determination.
The request does not require knowledge the internal administration of any creative journalistic activities, just the number of complaints about this particular public event, already televised to millions of people. And associated costs.
That's a clear separation of creative processes, which are rightly guarded - and the external input from the public that the BBC has received as a response to the event.
- Unless the argument is that the BBC regards public complaints as part of the BBC 'creative journalistic process' and it also has 'editorial rights' over public complaints, who might well assume that their correspondence is not to be editorialised- without permission - or creatively corrected by the BBC, since copyright remains with the sender.
Please therefore confirm that your response is for me to forward the request as a complaint to the ICO, as your public complaints system is part of the BBC's 'journalistic creative editorial process' as a clarification.