JV Anderson vs Chesterfield High School pre-action correspondence, 2012

Liverpool City Council did not have the information requested.

Dear Liverpool City Council,
Paragraph 29 of the Employment Appeal Tribunal judgement - http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/201... -
refers to "... correspondence between the solicitor for Liverpool City Council, the Respondent and Sefton in which the Respondent and Sefton expressed the view that the Claimant should not be paid by the school when he had available a substantial salary as the elected Mayor of Liverpool. ..."

Please provide copies of each of those pieces of correspondence.
Yours faithfully,

John Coyne

Finance and Resources, Liverpool City Council

Information request
Our reference: 516370

Dear Liverpool City Council,

Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of Information reviews.

I am writing to request an internal review of Liverpool City Council's handling of my FOI request 'JV Anderson vs Chesterfield High School pre-action correspondence, 2012'.

(1) Your response is long overdue.

(2) The URL in my original request is a broken link. Please use the following link for the Employment Appeal Tribunal

http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/201...

A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is available on the Internet at this address: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/j...

Yours faithfully,

John Coyne

Information Requests, Liverpool City Council

2 Attachments

Dear Mr Coyne,

 

Please see attached response to your request for information, as submitted
to Liverpool City Council.  Our apologies for the delay.

 

Regards

 

Information Team

 

Information Requests

Liverpool City Council

[1][email address]

[2]LCC auto signature (2)

 

show quoted sections

References

Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
2. http://www.liverpool.gov.uk/