Is The Service a Company

Response to this request is long overdue. By law, under all circumstances, HM Courts and Tribunals Service should have responded by now (details). You can complain by requesting an internal review.

Dear Her Majesty’s Courts and the Tribunals Service,
Is the H.M.C.T.S. a registered company, limited company or incorporated in any way?
IF so what are the benefits to the state?
Does it have any implications concerning the public accessing their rights to justice?
Does this mean that members of the public before your service are not only involved
in civil & criminal contract law, but also company contract law?
if this position has no impact on the public ,why is it necessary?

Yours faithfully,

Colin Lindley

HMCTS Customer Service (Correspondence),

Dear Mr Lindley,

Thank you for your emails of 20 April at 21:11, 19 April at 15:23 and 19 April at 14:24 sent to Ministry of Justice Data Access and Compliance Unit. Your emails have been passed to HM Courts & Tribunals Service's Customer Service Team and I have been asked to reply. I have consolidated your emails in the email chain below to respond to them accordingly.

HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) is an executive Government agency of the Ministry of Justice and is not a limited company or incorporated.

I note your various concerns about the application of common law. Unfortunately I am not legally trained and I am unable to provide you with the type of extra judicial legislative analysis that you seek and would be unable to assist you on the points that you raise. You may wish to seek independent legal advice. Any Citizens Advice Bureau can provide free, confidential and impartial advice on a range of matters and may have advisors who are experienced in this type of case. You could also contact Civil Legal Advice by telephone on 0345 345 4345 for help locating other appropriate advisory services in your local area.

I further note your concerns about the dissolution of parliament and your access to justice during this time. Cases before the courts continue to be heard during this period in accordance with the relevant legislation, rules and regulations. This does not provide any automatic right or guarantee of constituency support from an elected Member of Parliament. If you require assistance with any appeal you may again wish to consider seeking independent legal advice as previously mentioned.

Yours sincerely

Ms Harrison
Customer Service Team

From: Colin Lindley [mailto:[FOI #264775 email]]
Sent: 20 April 2015 21:11
To: Data Access & Compliance Unit
Subject: Freedom of Information request - Is The Service a Company

Dear Her Majesty's Courts and the Tribunals Service, Is the H.M.C.T.S. a registered company, limited company or incorporated in any way?
IF so what are the benefits to the state?
Does it have any implications concerning the public accessing their rights to justice?
Does this mean that members of the public before your service are not only involved in civil & criminal contract law, but also company contract law?
if this position has no impact on the public ,why is it necessary?

Yours faithfully,

Colin Lindley

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #264775 email]
From: Colin Lindley [mailto:[email address]]
Sent: 19 April 2015 15:23
To: Data Access & Compliance Unit
Subject: Freedom of Information request - RIGHTS & TRUTH attude of the state to absolutes

Dear Her Majesty's Courts and the Tribunals Service,

Could you please clarify if possible COMMON LAW applies to the SOVEREIGN INDIVIDUAL ?
What does a Judge consider the persons he is over seeing?
If you don't accept any difference between SOVEREIGN INDIVIDUAL & their Legal Fiction what laws support this ?
If you accept their is a difference between SOVEREIGN INDIVIDUAL & their Legal Fiction this difference applies to their legal standing ,what are these legal differences?
If you are aware of these facts why have they never been advertised ,explained or allowed a wider public awareness?Especially as being unaware ensure persons who may be innocent of many acts of so called law breaking as SOVEREIGN INDIVIDUALS but are criminalized as LEGAL FICTIONS by the state ,the courts withholding knowledge from the public in whos interest they act.
IS THIS IS A CONFLICT OF INTEREST?
Unfairly fixing the odds in the states & courts favour by actively obscuring lawful facts that benefit appellants, defendants & the general public by SUPPRESSION OF THE LAW WERE IT CONCERNS RIGHTS OF SOVEREIGN INDIVIDUALS COMPARED WITH THE COURTS RELIANCE ON PROSECUTING THEIR LEGAL FICTION WHY DO YOUR COURTS REQUIRE THE ACCEPTANCE OF A REAL PERSONS STRAW MAN ?
WHY WOULD YOUR COURTS PREFER TO CONTRACT WITH A MADE UP CONSTRUCT INSTEAD OF A REAL LIVE PERSON WITH GOD GIVEN RIGHTS & EQUITY BEFORE THE LAW?
WHY DOESNT THE STATE & COURTS DEAL FAIRLY & HONESTLY WITH THE SOVEREIGN INDIVIDUAL?
SOVEREIGN INDIVIDUALS have certain inalienably rights what would these be?
These Rights do not allow certain things in law to be attributed to such individuals are these available?
What is a legal fiction?
Is a person name in UPPER CASE[ i.e MR. UPPER CASE] a legal fiction?
Is a persons SOVEREIGN INDIVIDUALITY { upper of the family case} the same as { MR. UPPER CASE} & are the same laws & powers enforced in the same manner to each of these forms of address?
If a COURT or Tribunal Calls one ie Mr UPPER CASE & that person will only answer to his COMMON LAW name ie. upper of the family case what should be the attitude of the court & Judges?

Yours faithfully,

Colin Lindley

show quoted sections