Is the LR internal file 'reasoning' of a boundary change subject to FOIA, or not?

Dear Jt Oakley
it would appear there are quite a few of us members of the UK Public having exactly the same problems with Land Registry holding documents ( copies or un described) , that differ from the original documents we ourselves hold.
What is clear is that staff at Land Registry feel free to act outside of what their prescribed remits are , to avoid performing service roles, without being challenged by the majority of Members of Parliament or indeed the Courts.
To repeat what John Hemmings MP said in his Early Day Motions ( EDM'S) 699 & 700, it cannot be scientific to deny the supplying of information while pushing matters on through the Courts and even further on to the European Courts.
The advice of my solicitor is that a miscarriage of justice has occurred with my conveyance document for the purchase of my registered title being stolen and held by Land Registry. As the ruling in his judgement by HH Justice Peter Smith on 03/02/2012 was l could take matters back to the High Courts in London if a miscarriage of justice has occurred, then all that remains is for Land Registry to stop hiding behind the skirts of The Home Office regarding the wrong information the HO holds. I have lobbied my newly elected MP Victoria Atkins to write to the HO on my behalf to have this wrong information corrected and hopefully leave Land Registry having to explain their sinister actions in matters where they had no right to breach the Human Rights Act, being already on record with the Information Commissioners Office for failing to comply with a valid DPA(SAR) to avoid lawfully providing me with a copy of my own conveyance document that their own records show my needing this document on 26/09/2008.
I was told by KUH Land Registry's Mark Lawson at my meeting with him said 26/09/2008, that everything had been Land Registrys own mistakes / errors , and they would rectify the register at no cost to myself.
So much so that Mr Lawson would not take my completed Land Registry Form , provided by his Assistant Registrar ( John Edon), as he stated the land to be already registered as told me by his colleague Yvonne Owen on 15/02/2007.
However as Mr Lawson had refused me as a registered disabled person with limited mobility, from having my carer attend me ( my carer had to wait outside in the car after having driven me to this pre- booked appointment), it is a case of his word against mine.
Although you would wonder why l would put myself with fragile health and needing assistance to attend such a meeting and my then coming away without lodging the paperwork intended to be lodged that day.

Dear JT Oakley
I have located crucial information that l need to send to you.
Please supply contact details?

Dear JT Oakley
my involving the PHSO in March 2009 and copying the AHMLR into that MP referred letter, and when l had previously lodged complaint letters with both KUH Land Registry and Legal Services Commission ( Land Charges) in 2003; did nothing to encourage the correction / rectification ( of the register).of an "error" in the caution register that had been lodged in 1999. Here is the most shocking factor, l had reported an attack and rape on me at Mablethorpe Police Station to WPC Prigeon and made a statement on 19/10/1999. The names l gave when making this statement were connected with the then un-actioned lodging of this caution and depended on using a wrong post code and the theft of my own conveyance document in able to lodge it. In these respects this amounts to some serious degree of communication between the five parties seeking to deprive my registered title of properties / land, involvement of Lincolnshire Police and also Land Registry acting outside of their remits when accepting declarations lodged at the same time as the wrongly lodged post codes , using " Ireland Property / Land Law". I could be forgiven for perceiving Land Registry view themselves above all laws including the committing of serious crimes, and their involving themselves with such organised crime?

It seems to be a very secretive organisation.

It took me such a long time to sort things out last time as my letters to them were returned to me..unanswered.

It want until my MP backed me that there was any progress at all. With the result that it had to pay for its mistake.
It's guiding rule is seemingly to pretend nothing has happened. And refuse to communicate.

Julius Juispais from the Adjudicator to HM Land Registry confirmed to me in writing that the AHMLR did not involve themselves in matters involving " wills" or "probate" , when their deputy adjudicator Angus Andrew ( a barrister / commissioner for Legal Services Commission / live in partner of Ruth Wyatt- Director of Legal & Governance for LSC), allowed an "unprobated will" into evidence , when it has not been disclosed and wasn't seen by me until five months after the AHMLR hearing. Mr Juispais instructed me to keep resending the form and copies of my correct documents ( for my registered title) to Land Registry until they accepted them and processed them correctly. They would be sent back ( sent three times). Elizabeth Derrington ( Independent Complaints Review) , pannicked when a Solicitor wrote to Land Registry asking where my conveyance document was, and after four years of her doing nothing, she demanded Land Registry hand over my conveyance document and offer me £250.00p for my inconvenience. She also provided me copy of the ICR file where it showed John Edon ( Ass Land Registrar at KUH Land Registry), had told the ICR that the AHMLR was not answering him, which was the same as he told me on 23/06/2009 when he telephoned me and said that " you must put in for a stay on the adjudicators decision". This was because the owner of part of the involved land , who was thought to have died, was still alive. My Solicitors written advice was to inform Land Registry of this persons existence . An " alliance" appears to have been formed between Angus Andrew ( Adjudicator ) and John Edon, to misdirect me to ask for the "stay" , to enable the overlooking of my appeal, as both bodies treating the asking for a stay ( because of the existence of the excepted owner of part of the land) as " my appeal". My actual appeal that the Chief Adjudicator ( Edward Cousins ) allowed me an extension of time for (asked for by my Solicitor) was totally over-looked, although confirmed to ave been received. Edward Cousins then wrote to me two months later chastising me for not bothering to put in an appeal when he had allowed me extension of time in which to lodge my appeal. The Courts were given a false date for refusal to my appeal at the final charging order hearing, and l was persued relentlessly until over £73,000.00p was taken from me. Considering one Solicitor timed me out over the matter of costs and was on record to be billed for these costs, the whole thing is so out of kilter , you just could not make it up. The producing of my conveyance document ( that had been stolen) or copy of it ( asked for under the DPA in March 2009, from Land Registry), would have prevented my already registered title from being deprived of properties and vast amounts of land. Even when Land Registry were put on record by The Information Commissioners Office for breaching the DPA, they while on record, continued on 07/09/2011 , to give a further 50 acres with my registered title away to the persons who put the "error" caution against my title in 1999, that l supplied Land Charges ( LSC) with this "error paperwork" in early March 2000. The involvement of FORTY- THREE STAFF at LSC including Robbie Crane as Head of their Civil Bills, between 1999-2005, failed to correct the " error" , even when £ 6,900.00p was wrongly credited to the account of one of the cautioners in 2002 & 2003. This "error" was still in place when l spoke to Land Registry on 15/02/2007 and has been allowed to continue to allow the farce of nineteen Court Hearings to cover up

That sounds horrendous Diana.

The commonality seems to be that the Land Registry ignores communications.

If you protest that something has gone wrong, it doesn't seem to have a complaint system.

So you cannot put it right. Therefore any employee mistakes (?) are covered up.

Because land is worth a lot - it's possible that there is fraud within the LR.

Otherwise why not have a proper complaints system?

If it hasn't been for my MP wading in and getting backing from Lord someone or other, the LR would have covered up the fact that they redrew my boundary and gave my land to someone else ...all without telling me.

I signed a petition yesterday asking that the LR be kept in public ownership.

https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/s...

Yet it seems to have been operating as a private fiefdom for years. Ignoring any correspondence.

So I'm wondering if it was the right decision.

A private company might treat the public with more respect.

I have decided to ask exactly what the LR process is when it changes a boundary.

Therefore making a new request with different scope.