Dear Cambridgeshire County Council,
What documentation does cambridgshire county council use to identify members of the public you are trustee for.
Re: Freedom of Information Request FOI_978597
Your request will be dealt with in line with the Freedom of Information Act and its regulations. In accordance with the Act, the Council aims to respond to all requests within 20 working days; ie by 17th January.
Should we require further information, clarification or a fee in order to fulfil your request we will contact you again. Please quote the reference number above in all future correspondence concerning this request.
Business Intelligence Team – Information and Records
Tel. 01223 743881, Email: [Cambridgeshire County Council request email]
Box No. OCT1224, Cambridgeshire County Council, Shire Hall, Cambridge, CB3 0AP
In order to progress this request I need request a clarification from you as I cannot identify which documentation you are trying to access.
Can you please clarify what you mean by "trustee"?
Business Intelligence Team – Information and Records Tel. 01223 743881, Email: [Cambridgeshire County Council request email] Box No. OCT1224, Cambridgeshire County Council, Shire Hall, Cambridge, CB3 0AP
Hi there does Cambridgeshire council have the name of the man or woman who sent this reply i Michael need to clarify
Who or what is meant or Expressed when the reply states " i " would this refer to Cambridgeshire county council or would it refer to the man or woman serving that legal fiction??
In relation to trustee the land is held under care of the council which is a position of trust is it not ?
In relation to this matter as Cambridgeshire’s county council's precept ie SCDC have stated under freedom of information they don’t use a style manual could Cambridgeshire county council provide What their own and all precepts interpretation of these word’s are
For the sake of ambiguity when i Michael state “ i “ this would denote/refer to Michael the man which is i ,sadly both Cambridgeshire county council and SCDC are under the presumption ( in law ) that i michael (the man) hold fiduciary obligation to a person that has never been born and created by the crown corporation around the same time i michael was born , logic would dictate this denotes a form of slavery by way of subversion . If the man or woman reading this would care to clarify Cambridgeshire county council’s ( inclusive of all precepts) position or documentation in relation to this as i believe you will find i michael am the lawful creditor as are the other men and woman of Cambridgeshire due to the gold standards act , Geneva convection, Gdpr ,how else is a debt based economy run , so please provide evidence of the legal documentation/contracts or identification and fiduciary obligation between i michael and the person that was never legally and lawfuly born .
Without ill will or vexation , frivolty or prejudice
is duly noted that when an inhabitant of Cambridgeshire telephones the local or county council the first thing they have to do is confirm their identity , The questions asked by the coucils relate to birth witch would denote the councils are using the birth certificate to identify the public , we believe and can evidence via the document its self that it “is not to be used for identification” , as stated this would be a form of subversion and coercion i.e procuring joinder with a fictional entity owned by the crown this would denote legal name fraud as it is only members of the B.A.R that can deal with crown copy write , and there is also case history directly relating to issue, do the cfo’s 151 officers of the local county or district councils hold Bar cards ?? Or is a legal team created for and on the specific purpose to subvert the true meaning of what a local county / District / parish councils are supposed to be , the fact the councils own documentation is also subject to crown copy write witch would denote that if the birth certificate is being used for identification purposes a unilateral contract/agreement is formed upon the member of public confirming a date of birth the legal team are then free engage with that entity in the private hence the county’s “need” for “lgss” who don’t deal with the public. Do the council believe That men and women are stupid ?? We comprehend we have been marginalised the birth certificate documents prove it the fact SCDC’s legal team can offer no comment speaks for its self , hence they no longer wish to speak to me as i speak Fact , witch has no place in their office , they cant even provide the interpretation of words they have printed and sighed which is fraudulent as full disclosure has not been supplied .
This is the reason for my original request.
Without ill will or vexation to the good men and women who serve the county
We work to defend the right to FOI for everyone
Help us protect your right to hold public authorities to account. Donate and support our work.Donate Now