How much do social services get paid in bonuses for snatching our children, Gagging orders, Deceit & Corruption within the family courts.

Response to this request is long overdue. By law, under all circumstances, Supreme Court of the United Kingdom should have responded by now (details). You can complain by requesting an internal review.

Dear Supreme Court of the United Kingdom,

The evidence is out within the public domain with the suspected
corruption within social services and the family courts, snatching
children for no good reason, wrong decisions are made or falsifying
reasons for child protection. I have had my own experience; my
child snatched by social services and the family courts for
reporting child abuse. Everyone I speak to has had a negative
experience with social services and family courts. I have been told
that Judge Munby has been in the media speaking about suspected
corruption.

It appears that no action is ever taken against any professional
that lies and fraudulently snatches a child from its rightful
parents, nor any action taken against any judge that ignores
evidence of corruption, thus parents do not stand a chance of
obtaining rightful justice. This is a misappropriation of their
power.

1. How many cases are there, on average, per day, in the family
courts throughout the UK, and out of these cases how many.
a) Social workers, CAFCASS or professionals have lied or
manipulated the truth to the courts to obtain an order to kidnap or
snatch the children?
b) Social workers, CAFCASS or professionals have told the courts
the truth to obtain an order to kidnap or snatch the children?

2. How many cases are there, on average, per day, in the family
courts throughout the UK, and out of these cases how many.
a) Judges have ignored evidence that Social workers, CAFCASS or
professionals have lied or manipulated the truth to the courts to
obtain an order to kidnap or snatch the children?
b) Judges have ignored evidence that Social workers, CAFCASS or
professionals have told the courts the truth to obtain an order to
kidnap or snatch the children?

3. I read somewhere that only 20 cases out of 10000 are won by
parents per year. What are the actual stats of cases won by parents
against social services within the family courts per year?

4. How many people or parents have had their children stolen by the
family courts, despite proving that Social workers, CAFCASS or
professionals have lied or manipulated the truth to the courts?

5. If a judge ignores police evidence that social services have
misled the courts, has this judge perverted the course of justice,
if so how many judges have been brought to account?
a) What action was taken against these professionals or judges?

6. I have heard from others, and it happened to me personally, that
a judge highly criticised me for obtaining evidence that a social
worker had a) covered up mistakes made by social workers and the
abuse of my child, altered medical records, falsified
investigations, mislead professionals, falsified concerns about
myself.
a) Is a judge actually perverting the course of justice by stopping
a person or parent seeking evidence to prove their innocence?
b) Is a social worker or professional perverting the course of
justice by stopping a parent or person seeking evidence to prove
their innocence?
c) Should this be a crime of stopping a parent or person gaining
evidence to prove mistruths, what action would be taken against a
judge or social worker for stopping evidence being obtained by a
person or parent against social workers? Has any action been taken
against judges or social workers for stopping parents obtaining
evidence?
d) Is stopping a parent or person seeking evidence against social
services or any professional a breech of Article 6 Human Rights Act
(right to fair trial). If so what action should be taken against a
social worker, CAFCASS or judge. Has any action been taken against
social worker, CAFCASS, judge etc for an Article 6 breech.

7. It appears that perverting the course of justice is not a crime
anymore as no action is taken against the daily corruption within
these secret courts. This is sending out the message that that
justice no longer stands within the UK.
Does no action against the corruption within the family courts and
social services give us, the UK public, the right to also mislead
authorities regarding such things as our income, benefits, income
tax, etc.
a) How many times has the public (not attending the courts in a
professional manner) been taken to court for misleading the courts
or lying to the courts or lying to an authority (such as falsifying
a tax return)
b) How many times have a professional (attending the courts in a
professional manner) been taken to court for misleading the courts
or lying to the courts? (such as falsifying a s47 report to the
courts just like Haringey council recently did)

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/...

8. I have heard in the grapevine that MP’s are speaking out about
gagging orders. Is a social worker, professional or judge
recommending or ordering a gagging order against a parent in the
aim to prevent a parent or person reporting a judge, social worker
or professional for perverting the course of justice or exposing
corruption, would this gagging order also be perverting the course
of justice, if so how many gagging orders have been issued to
prevent the exposure of the corruption within social services or
the family courts?

9. Is it in the job description or policy of social services &
CAFCASS to hit targets of child adoption, or was this policy
scrapped in 2008, as mentioned in the article below. I have heard
that local authorities still receive CASH BONUSES and financial
incentives for meeting adoption targets. Is this true?
a) What are the targets and how much cash is each of our children
worth to local authorities.
b) I have heard that blue eyed blond haired children are more
prudently targeted by social services as they are said to be more
favourable to potential adoptee, therefore have more of a financial
interest to the local authorities . I have been told that disabled
or foreign children are worth less cash to local authorities.
Please can you break down what each race, hair, eye colour,
disabled child etc is worth to local authorities and also break
down stats of ethnic origin of children snatched or adopted within
the UK.

Within the link below it shows that local authorities compete for
pay-outs to reach adoption targets

“Under the initiative, town halls compete for payouts of up to £36
million for increasing the number of children they remove from
their natural families and place with adoptive parents.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1...

10. How many parents have faced injustice and had their child or
children snatched, fostered or adopted on the basis that local
authorities had the agenda to meet targets and receive cash rather
than the best interest of the child. Is snatching a child from a
parent for the sole purpose of a local authority meeting targets a
breech of Article 8 (right to family life). If so what action
should be taken against a social worker, CAFCASS or judge etc for
breach of Article 8 HRA. What action has been taken against a
social worker, CAFCASS or judge for an article 8 breech.

John Hemming exposes corruption
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-c6ATb7DP8

Corrupt Family Court Judges
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGzgLDV7D58

Family Court - the Source of the Corruption
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJjgOjq5uso

My FOI
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/m...

Yours faithfully,

John E Thomas

Brigland, Paul (Supreme Court),

PLEASE NOTE THAT EMAIL ADDRESSES FOR THE SUPREME COURT ARE CHANGING.

From 21 December 2013, please forward/send all emails to: [email address]

Any emails to this current address will not be received.

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s).
Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the
intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and
read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in
response to this message by e-mail.

This email has been sent from an email service operated for the UK Supreme Court by the
Ministry of Justice (MoJ). Communication via this service may be automatically logged,
monitored and/or recorded for legal and service support purposes, and emails identified
as containing malicious or inappropriate content may be blocked.

Emails on this service will not be read by anyone except the sender or intended recipient
unless there is a genuine legal requirement to do so and only with the appropriate lawful authority.

With respect to any email sent or received by a judge, the 'appropriate authority' will
be a senior member of the judiciary or other authority as agreed with the judiciary.
(For this purpose of this statement references to the 'judiciary' and 'judge' includes
all full time, part time and deputy judges, Recorders and all legal and non-legal members
of Tribunals, whether salaried or fee-paid who use judicial information in order to under take their duties.)

It is UKSC and MoJ policy to comply with all legal and regulatory requirements in the handling
of email communications. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing
or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

show quoted sections

Sent request to Supreme Court of the United Kingdom again, using a new contact address.