Dear North Norfolk District Council,

I would like a copy of all meeting notes, notes of phone calls, all letters and email correspondences on the flooding, surface water and sewage issues in Hoveton from 1.1.18 to 17.1.18.

The request for copies of all communications (as set out above) between the following parties:
Communications undertaken by the Local Member for Hoveton (Cllr Nigel Dixon), either in his capacity of local member or the cabinet member for economic development, using all email addresses from NNDC and/or including his own AOL account between himself to:

a) Anglian Water from 1.1.18 to 17.1.18
And
b) Enviromental Agency from 1.1.18 to 17.1.18
And
c) FW Builders from 1.1.18 to 17.1.18
And
d) NNDC planning officers at NNDC from 1.1.18 to 17.1.18

Yours faithfully,
[Name Removed]

Dear Ms Read

Thank you for the FOI response.
There are a number of clarifications sought:
NNDC provide 8 attachments as its full FOI Request Response. I will take each attachment, describe its contents and end with a clarification request for each attachment:

Attachment 1. HTML 49k
Contents of the FOI attachment contained 2 emails as follows:
Email 1 - Nigel Dixon→FW Builders dated 7.1.18
Subject: Happy new year message
Clarification sought from NNDC:
There is no email content/discussion, is this missing or does it not exist?
Email 2 - Resident Meadow Drive→Rob Parkinson dated 7.1.2018
Cc Nigel Dixon
Subject: Objection letter based on drainage problems
Clarification sought:
Why was an objection letter supplied as it is not within the scope of the FOI?

Attachment 2. HTML 12k
Contents of the FOI attachment contained 4 emails as follows
Email 1 - Hannah Wilson of Anglian Water→Rob Parkinson dated 10.1.18 @14.31
Confirming that AW has capacity to treat proposed flows
Email 2 - Rob Parkinson→Julian Wells 10.1.18 @14.54
Hannah Wilson’s email forwarded by Rob Parkinson to FW Builders
Email 3 - Julian Wells-→Nigel Dixon 10.1.18 @ 17.06
Julian Wells sends Nigel Dixon a letter as an attachment
Clarification from NNDC sought:
The letter omitted/withheld from FOI response - is this a mistake?

Email 4
Nigel Dixon→FW Builders
10th January 2018 @ 21.06
Nigel Dixon responding to Julian Wells letter -
ND stating that FW Builders letter offers no assurances
Clarification from NNDC sought:
FW Builders letter not attached and response from ND impossible to understand without FW Builders letter - did R Parkinson and Nigel Dixon discuss by email or any other medium the drainage issue?

Attachment 3. Image.004.jpg - 0k
This attachment contained a blank page supplied as FOI response
Clarification from NNDC sought:
Why was a blank page supplied under FOI - is there information missing?

Attachment 4. Image 001.png - 2k
FW Builders logo and blank page supplied as FOI response
Clarification from NNDC sought:
Why was a logo and blank page submitted as part of an FOI - is there information missing?

Attachment 5. Image002.jpg 3k
RICS logo and blank page supplied as FOI response
Clarification sought :
Why was a RICS logo and blank page submitted as part of an FOI request - is there information missing?

Attachment 6. image005.jpg - 0k
Blank page supplied as FOI response
Clarification sought:
Why was a blank page supplied as an FOI response - is there information missing?

Attachment 7. image003.jpg - 0k
Blank page supplied as FOI response
Clarification from NNDC sought:
Why was a blank page supplie as an FOI response - is there information missing?

8. 224196.doc - 38k
Undated file note - Reference KR/009649/224196
The author of this file note is presumed to be Cllr Dixon but to which file or persons this is written for is unknown.
This file note is compiled from communications the district councillor has had on the drainage issues with
1. Anglian Water
2.
Mr Martin of Hilcot

The FOI specifically and critically requests sight of the primary source documents.
While this file note is detailed it is a translation of the primary source communications requested under FOI.
As the district councillor who presumably wrote this file note uses quotation makes from a statement from AW - there are obviously notes from a phone call[s] and/or meetings.

Therefore, I request full disclosure of the primary source notes for these communications. Please note, It is incredulous to believe that the file note by the district councillor was written off the top of the head and/or from memory.

Further, the district councillor states that he has visited the site and was briefed by Mr Martin.
Therefore, I request full disclosure of the primary source notes for the meeting with Mr Martin.

Finally, I seek confirmation of point D of the orginal FOI request.
Please could NNDC confirm that there was no communication between NNDC planning and Cllr Dixon on the flooding, surface water and sewage issues in Hoveton from 1.1.18 to 17.1.18?

I look forward to NNDC.
Yours sincerely,
[Name Removed]