Homeless applications and internal review statistics

The request was successful.

Dear Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council, could you please provide information in full, or if not in part, for the following.

In this freedom of information request reference is made to third party representation. This refers to individuals who had submissions made on their behalf by a solicitors or housing advice service which is not funded by a local authority.

1) How many homeless applications were made in the financial year ending in April 2017?

2) How many homeless decisions were notified in the financial year ending in April 2017?

3) How many of the decisions referred to in Q2 were subject to a review request under s.202 of the Housing Act 1996?

4) How many of the review requests referred to in Q3 later had submissions made by a third party representative on their behalf?

5) How many of the reviews requests referred to in Q2 received a ‘minded to’ letter under Regulation 8(2) of the Allocation of Housing and Homelessness (Review Procedures) Regulations 1999?

6) How many of the applicants referred to in Q5 who received a ‘minded to’ letter had previously had a review request made on their behalf by a third party?

7) How many of the reviews requested in the financial year ending in April 2017 under s.202 of the Housing Act 1996 led to the original decision being changed following an internal review?

8) How many of the applicants who received the altered decisions referred to in Q7 had third party representation?

Yours faithfully,

Louis Dowd

Sandwell MBC, Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council

Mr Louis Dowd
 
 
Your request for information has been passed to an investigating officer.
 
Your reference is FS-Case-70657045
 
 
Thank you
 
Sandwell MBC

Mandy Amos, Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council

For the Attention of Louis Dowd

 

Dear Mr Dowd

 

Thank you for your recent Freedom of Information request regarding
homeless applications and internal review statistics, please find below
 in bold the responses to the questions you have asked.

 

In this freedom of information request reference is made to third party
representation. This refers to individuals who had submissions made on
their behalf by a solicitors or housing advice service which is not funded
by a local authority.

 

1)How many homeless applications were made in the financial year ending in
April 2017?

Sandwell MBC received 840 homeless applications in the financial year
ending April 2017

 

2)How many homeless decisions were notified in the financial year ending
in April 2017?

Sandwell MBC notified of 840 homeless decisions in the financial year
ending April 2017

 

3)How many of the decisions referred to in Q2 were subject to a review
request under s.202 of the Housing Act 1996?

Sandwell MBC received 48 requests for review under S.202 of the Housing
Act 1996

 

4)How many of the review requests referred to in Q3 later had submissions
made by a third party representative on their behalf?

Of the request for Review’s received,  10 had submissions made by a third
party representative on their behalf

 

5)How many of the reviews requests referred to in Q2 received a ‘minded
to’ letter under Regulation 8(2) of the Allocation of Housing and
Homelessness (Review Procedures) Regulations 1999?

Of the request for Review’s received,  48 received a “minded to” letter
under Regulation 8(2) of the Allocation and Housing and Homelessness
(Review Procedures) Regulations 1999

 

6)How many of the applicants referred to in Q5 who received a ‘minded to’
letter had previously had a review request made on their behalf by a third
party?

Of the applicants who received a “minded to” letter, 10 had a review
request made on their behalf by a third party.

 

7)How many of the reviews requested in the financial year ending in April
2017 under s.202 of the Housing Act 1996 led to the original decision
being changed following an internal review?

Of the request for Reviews received, 7  applicants has their original
decision changed following and internal review.

 

8)How many of the applicants who received the altered decisions referred
to in Q7 had third party representation?

Of the applicants who received an altered decision following an internal
review, 6 had third party representations

 

If you are dissatisfied with the handling of your request, you have the
right to ask for an internal review. Internal review requests should be
submitted within two months of the date of receipt of the response to your
request, and should be addressed to:

Information Management Unit

Oldbury Council House

Freeth Street

Oldbury

West Midlands

B69 3DE

Email – [1][Sandwell Council request email]

Please note that any additional questions to your original request will
not be answered at internal review stage and should be presented in a
separate, new Freedom of Information request.

 

If you are not content with the outcome of an internal review, you have
the right to apply directly to the Information Commissioner for a
decision.

The Information Commissioner can be contacted at:

Information Commissioner's Office

Wycliffe House

Water Lane

Wilmslow

Cheshire SK9 5AF

Please remember to quote your reference number above in any future

communications.

 

Kind Regards

 

Mandy Amos

Housing Choice Co-ordinator

Sandwell MBC

Business and Development Center

Roway Lane

Oldbury

West Midlands

B69 3ES

 

Tel: 0121 368 1166 Option 2

The information in this message must be regarded as confidential and is
intended for the addressee only unless explicitly stated. If you have
received this message in error notify the sender and delete it. Any views
or opinions expressed within this email are those of the author and may
not necessarily reflect those of Sandwell MBC and no contractual
arrangement is intended to arise from this communication. You should also
be aware that any email may be subject to a request under Data Protection,
Freedom of Information or Environmental Information legislation and
therefore could be disclosed to third parties. Please note that Sandwell
MBC cannot guarantee that this message or any attachments are virus or
malware free and have not been intercepted and amended.

 

This e mail is marked with an Impact Level (IL) code denoting the impact
that any unauthorised disclosure of the content would have on Sandwell
MBC.

This message has been assessed and graded

 

Level 0 - Unclassified

Level 1  – Protect

Level 2  – Protect

Level 3  – Restricted

 

 

 

 

References

Visible links
1. mailto:[Sandwell Council request email]