Holliday's Plain
Dear The Crown Estate,
Within the last year or two, the land partly known as Holliday's Plain in Windsor, started to be patrolled by wardens with the purpose of compelling members of the public to leave the area. The point at which it bordered with the footpath alongside the Legoland car park was then fenced off. The previous fence had fallen down many years ago (10 or more) and small numbers of the public had been in the habit of walking on this land.
My questions:
Which individual or body made the decision to patrol and then fence off the land?
What was the reason the decision was made?
What benefit is it to the people of Windsor that this land is now in accessible?
What are the long term plans for this land?
Yours faithfully,
Matthew Lenton
Thank you for your email which is receiving our attention. We will get
back to you with a response as soon as we can.
If your email is a request for information, it will be handled under the
Freedom of Information Act and we will aim to provide you with a response
as soon as possible, but at least within the 20 working days specified in
the Act.
Dear Mr Lenton
Your information request (1216)
I am writing in response to your email of 1 September 2020, in which you
made an information request. We have considered your request in line with
the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA).
As you may be aware, FOIA entitles a right to recorded information, and we
hold none that is directly relevant to your questions. However, I have
provided some contextual information below which I hope will be helpful.
Where repairs occur across the Windsor Estate, such as to a fence, these
are carried out as part of day to day operations, with communication
usually conducted face-to-face or over the telephone.
There are various points of access to the Windsor Estate for use by the
general public. For some areas of the estate, which are particularly
ecologically sensitive, The Crown Estate operates a gate key membership
scheme for local residents. This system has been in place for many years,
and allows residents living within one mile of the gates access to the
estate. More information about this scheme is available on our website at:
[1]https://www.windsorgreatpark.co.uk/media...
I hope that this information is helpful. However, if you are not
satisfied with the way we have handled your information request, you may
appeal our decision which will then be investigated through an internal
review. If you are not content with the outcome of that, you have the
right to refer any complaint directly to the ICO (contact details are
available at: [2]www.ico.org.uk). The ICO will usually expect you to have
first exhausted our own complaints procedure before raising any concerns
with them.
Yours sincerely
Aimee Gasston | Freedom of Information Officer
T: +44 20 7851 5046
[3]The Crown Estate
1 St James's Market, London, SW1Y 4AH
[4]thecrownestate.co.uk
[5]LinkedIn [6]Twitter [7]Instagram
LEGAL DISCLAIMER - IMPORTANT NOTICE
The information in this message, including any attachments, is intended
solely for the use of the person to whom it is addressed. It may be
confidential and subject to legal professional privilege and it should not
be disclosed to or used by anyone else. If you receive this message in
error please let the sender know straight away. The Crown Estate's head
office is at 1 St James's Market London SW1Y 4AH.
We cannot accept liability resulting from email transmission.
From: Matthew Lenton <[8][FOI #688722 email]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 1, 2020 9:07 PM
To: Enquiries <[9][email address]>
Subject: Freedom of Information request - Holliday's Plain
Dear The Crown Estate,
Within the last year or two, the land partly known as Holliday's Plain in
Windsor, started to be patrolled by wardens with the purpose of compelling
members of the public to leave the area. The point at which it bordered
with the footpath alongside the Legoland car park was then fenced off. The
previous fence had fallen down many years ago (10 or more) and small
numbers of the public had been in the habit of walking on this land.
My questions:
Which individual or body made the decision to patrol and then fence off
the land?
What was the reason the decision was made?
What benefit is it to the people of Windsor that this land is now in
accessible?
What are the long term plans for this land?
Yours faithfully,
Matthew Lenton
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[10][FOI #688722 email]
Is [11][The Crown Estate request email] the wrong address for Freedom of
Information requests to The Crown Estate? If so, please contact us using
this form:
[12]https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/change_re...
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on
the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
[13]https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/offi...
For more detailed guidance on safely disclosing information, read the
latest advice from the ICO:
[14]https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/ico-...
Please note that in some cases publication of requests and responses will
be delayed.
If you find this service useful as an FOI officer, please ask your web
manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
References
Visible links
1. https://www.windsorgreatpark.co.uk/media...
2. http://www.ico.org.uk/
4. https://www.thecrownestate.co.uk/
5. https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-cro...
6. https://twitter.com/TheCrownEstate
7. https://www.instagram.com/thecrownestate/
8. mailto:[FOI #688722 email]
9. mailto:[email address]
10. mailto:[FOI #688722 email]
11. mailto:[The Crown Estate request email]
12. https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/change_re...
13. https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/offi...
14. https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/ico-...
Dear Aimee Gasston,
Thank you for your response.
You stated that you hold no recorded information relevant to my questions.
Please would you clarify that the decision to start regular patrols of the land by wardens in Land Rovers, despite, presumably, the fact that this would have a financial cost, was made purely verbally and not documented in any minutes, for example?
I understand that under normal circumstances fence repairs would be carried out on a day to day basis, and one would suppose that broken fences would normally be repaired within a reasonably short time period following the need for the repair being noticed. Could you clarify that, in this particular case, where a long stretch of fence was entirely missing for a period of around ten years, the decision to carry out the repair was again taken purely verbally, and no written record exists?
Furthermore, can you please confirm that there is no document held that describes any long term plan or strategy for this piece of land?
Yours sincerely,
Matthew Lenton
Dear Mr Lenton
Your internal review (1237)
Please find attached a response to your internal review request.
Yours sincerely
Aimee Gasston | Freedom of Information Officer
T: +44 20 7851 5046
[1]The Crown Estate
1 St James's Market, London, SW1Y 4AH
[2]thecrownestate.co.uk
[3]LinkedIn [4]Twitter [5]Instagram
LEGAL DISCLAIMER - IMPORTANT NOTICE
The information in this message, including any attachments, is intended
solely for the use of the person to whom it is addressed. It may be
confidential and subject to legal professional privilege and it should not
be disclosed to or used by anyone else. If you receive this message in
error please let the sender know straight away. The Crown Estate's head
office is at 1 St James's Market London SW1Y 4AH.
We cannot accept liability resulting from email transmission.
From: Matthew Lenton <[FOI #688722 email]>
Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2020 9:25 PM
To: Aimee Gasston <[email address]>
Subject: Internal review of Freedom of Information request - Holliday's
Plain
Dear Aimee Gasston,
Thank you for your response.
You stated that you hold no recorded information relevant to my questions.
Please would you clarify that the decision to start regular patrols of the
land by wardens in Land Rovers, despite, presumably, the fact that this
would have a financial cost, was made purely verbally and not documented
in any minutes, for example?
I understand that under normal circumstances fence repairs would be
carried out on a day to day basis, and one would suppose that broken
fences would normally be repaired within a reasonably short time period
following the need for the repair being noticed. Could you clarify that,
in this particular case, where a long stretch of fence was entirely
missing for a period of around ten years, the decision to carry out the
repair was again taken purely verbally, and no written record exists?
Furthermore, can you please confirm that there is no document held that
describes any long term plan or strategy for this piece of land?
Yours sincerely,
Matthew Lenton
We work to defend the right to FOI for everyone
Help us protect your right to hold public authorities to account. Donate and support our work.
Donate Now