Grades awarded in the subject of anthropology in 2023/2024
Dear University College London,
What have been the worst and best grades awarded in the bachelor's degree in anthropology in the year 2023/2024.
What has been the percentage distribution for First Class Honors, Upper Second 2:1, Lower Second 2:2, Third and <40
Yours faithfully,
Heike Bauer
If you have submitted a Freedom of Information request please accept this
email as acknowledgement that your request has been received. You should
expect a response from us within 20 working days.
For details on how we use your personal information, please see UCL's
general privacy
notice: [1]www.ucl.ac.uk/legal-services/privacy/general-privacy-notice
Data Protection Office
Office of General Counsel
References
Visible links
1. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/legal-services/pri...
Dear University College London,
I am particularly interested in the following courses
2023 ANTH0029 The Anthropology of Nationalism, Ethnicity and Race
2023 ANTH0045 Ritual Healing and Therapeutic Emplotment
2023 ANTH0074 Art in the Public Sphere
2023 IEHC0030 A Life Course Approach to Health
2023 ANTH0136 The Anthropology of Violent Aftermaths
2023 ANTH0182 Medical Anthropology
2023 BASC0039 Disability, Chronic Illness and Neurodivergence in the Contemporary Society
2023 ANTH0079 Aspects of Applied Medical Anthropology
Yours faithfully,
Heike Bauer
Dear Heike,
Thank you for your request made under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA).
Could you please confirm that regarding your request for: ' What have been the worst and best grades awarded in the bachelor's degree in anthropology in the year 2023/2024, and what has been the percentage distribution for First Class Honors, Upper Second 2:1, Lower Second 2:2, Third and <40?' - you would like to know this information for the modules listed below or for the Anthropology BSc as a whole?
Kind regards,
Fawwaz Noibi
Data Protection and Freedom of Information Administrator
Data Protection Office
Office of the General Counsel
University College London
Tel: 020 3108 6389 (ext. 56389)
Email: [email address]
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
Confidentiality and Legal Privilege: The contents of this email and its attachment(s) are confidential to the intended recipient and may be legally privileged. They are not to be disclosed, copied, forwarded, used or relied upon by any person other than the intended addressee. If you believe that you have received the e-mail and its attachment(s) in error, you must not take any action based on them and you must not copy or show them to anyone. Please respond to the sender and delete this email and its attachment(s) from your system.
Dear Fawwaz
Thank you very much for your quick reply. I would be very hgrateful if you could provide information for both, the individual courses and anthropology as a whole.
Yours sincerely,
Heike Bauer
Dear Finance.FOI Requests,
Dear Fawwaz
I would like to know
1. the highest and the lowest grade for the modules.
2. the percentage distribution for First Class Honors, Upper Second 2:1, Lower Second 2:2, Third and <40?
for both, the modules and the bachelors degree as a whole.
Yours sincerely,
Heike Bauer
Dear Heike,
Thank you for your request for information made under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) 2000.
We confirm that we hold some of the information of the description
specified in your request; please see our response below and the attached
document.
Your request
What have been the worst and best grades awarded in the bachelor's degree
in anthropology in the year 2023/2024.
What has been the percentage distribution for First Class Honors, Upper
Second 2:1, Lower Second 2:2, Third and <40 in the 2023/24 academic year
for both Anthropology BA and the below modules:
2023 ANTH0029 The Anthropology of Nationalism, Ethnicity and
Race
2023 ANTH0045 Ritual Healing and Therapeutic Emplotment
2023 ANTH0074 Art in the Public Sphere
2023 IEHC0030 A Life Course Approach to Health
2023 ANTH0136 The Anthropology of Violent Aftermaths
2023 ANTH0182 Medical Anthropology
2023 BASC0039 Disability, Chronic Illness and Neurodivergence
in the Contemporary Society
2023 ANTH0079 Aspects of Applied Medical Anthropology
Our response
Before responding to your request, I should explain that individual
modules are not equivalent to, and do not constitute, a degree level
qualification which means students are not awarded a first-class honour,
2:1, 2:2 etc upon individual module completion. Depending on the choices
made by each student, as part of their degree, they select several
different modules to complete (which may include those that you have
listed) the total of which will make up their degree. With this in mind,
it means that UCL does not hold information on the number of students who
attained a 1^st, 2:1, 2:2, 3^rd for each of the modules requested.
We also do not hold the information in the format you have requested
(worst and best grades, and the percentage distribution of First Class,
Upper Second, Lower Second, Third Honours, and failing final grades), and
we are unable to provide you with individualised bespoke data because this
would constitute us creating new data. However, we have a standard set of
data which displays module results in deciles (sections for each 10% of
the possible score a student could achieve).
The tables in the attached document shows the number of students who
completed the listed modules, and the marks they achieved, broken down in
10-point deciles, and the number of graduates who were awarded First
Class, Second Class (Upper Division), and Second Class (Lower Division)
Honours in BSc Anthropology in the 2023/24 Academic Year.
Please note the following:
• Regarding Table 2, the figure under each mark range (00.01-9.99,
10.00-19.99, 20.00-29.99 etc.) is the number of students who achieved
that specific range of marks. For example, with regards to the module
code ‘ANTH0029’, this shows that 6 students achieved a mark of
40.00-49.99. Similarly, for the same module code, 35 students achieved
a mark between 60.00-69.99.
• The award and mark numbers are preliminary as the result of Late
Summer Assessments are not confirmed.
• As you can see, we are unable to disclose the exact number of students
or graduates where 5 or fewer received a specific range of marks or
degree classification.
This is because to provide the exact numbers may inadvertently lead to the
identification of these individuals. Whilst there are no personally
identifiable details within the data being withheld, that data, when
combined with other data that may already be available in the public
domain, could be used by ‘motivated intruders’ and other knowledgeable
third parties to identify the individuals concerned. Linking together
separate strands of data available in this way can indirectly lead to an
individual being identified which would breach the first data protection
principle. Further, these individuals would have no expectation that their
identities, by virtue of disclosing this type of information, would be
made known to the wider public and it would be considered unfair to do so.
As this data would be likely to become personal data, this information is
exempt from disclosure and has been withheld under section 40(2) of the
FOIA by virtue of s40(3A)(a). Section 40(2) of the FOIA allows a public
authority to withhold information under the FOIA where (i) the requested
information is personal data relating to someone other than the requester
and (ii) its disclosure would breach any of the data protection
principles.
It is for these reasons that this information is exempt under section
40(2) of the Act. As the section 40(2) exemption is absolute, there is no
need to conduct a public interest test.
You are free to use any information supplied for your own use, including
for non-commercial research purposes. The information may also be used for
the purposes of news reporting. However, any other type of re-use, for
example by publishing or issuing copies to the public, will require the
permission of the copyright owner.
If you have any queries or concerns, please contact me using the details
provided in this letter and including the request reference number. If you
are unhappy with our response to your request and wish to make a complaint
or request a review of our decision, please email [1][email address].
Emails should include the words ‘Internal Review’ in the subject and be
marked ‘For the Attention of the Vice-President (Operations)’.
Alternatively, please write to:
Vice-President (Operations)
University College London
Gower Street
London
WC1E 6BT
Please note that complaints and requests for internal review received more
than two months after the initial decision will not be handled. If you are
not content with the outcome of the internal review, you may apply
directly to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) by using the
following web address: [2]www.ico.org.uk/foicomplaints or by writing to
the ICO at the following address:
Wycliffe House
Water Lane
Wilmslow
SK9 5AF
0303 123 1113
You should do this within two months of our final decision. Further
information on the FOIA is available on the ICO’s website:
[4]https://ico.org.uk/for-the-public/offici...
Kind regards,
Fawwaz Noibi
Data Protection and Freedom of Information Administrator
Data Protection Office
Office of the General Counsel
University College London
Tel: 020 3108 6389 (ext. 56389)
Email: [5][email address]
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
Confidentiality and Legal Privilege: The contents of this email and its
attachment(s) are confidential to the intended recipient and may be
legally privileged. They are not to be disclosed, copied, forwarded, used
or relied upon by any person other than the intended addressee. If you
believe that you have received the e-mail and its attachment(s) in error,
you must not take any action based on them and you must not copy or show
them to anyone. Please respond to the sender and delete this email and its
attachment(s) from your system.
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[email%20address]
2. http://www.ico.org.uk/foicomplaints
3. https://ico.org.uk/
4. https://ico.org.uk/for-the-public/offici...
5. mailto:[email%20address]
We work to defend the right to FOI for everyone
Help us protect your right to hold public authorities to account. Donate and support our work.
Donate Now