FRAUD - DELIBERATE LOSS OF EVIDENCE ROYAL COURTS OF JUSTICE

Julie Shrive (Account suspended) made this Freedom of Information request to Social Security Advisory Committee

This request has been closed to new correspondence from the public body. Contact us if you think it ought be re-opened.

Social Security Advisory Committee did not have the information requested.

Julie Shrive (Account suspended)

Dear Sir or Madam,

Who checks that an Appeals Tribunals decision has been executed fairly ?As I and many others ,have been caused injustice. Nobody appears to be in charge resolving ??!! They use legal and medical persons names to pretend they are them on a remit . Often documents are not signed .Surely fraudulent?

Yours faithfully,

Julie Shrive

SSAC DWP New Court,

Dear Julie Shrive
The SSAC is an advisory body to government, dealing with social security
policy and law, and your concerns do not fall within our remit. I would
suggest that you direct your enquiry to the Administrative Justice and
Tribunals Council.
Regards
Gill Saunders (Committee Secretary)

show quoted sections

Julie Shrive (Account suspended)

Dear SSAC DWP New Court,

Do you think haven't been ??!!!!! Where is official not on remit or contract dealing with discretionary and ethical issues or are we not in a democracy? Need urgent meeting as needs to be oral as I am dyspraxic and confused with legal expert witness as THE RCJ are acting illegally . Apparently stats show that . This is second time since 2001/2 ??!! How many others suffered ?Do you not understand how serious this is??!!
Julie Shrive

8 June 2009

Dear Sir or Madam,

Who sees that the administration of Benefits and the Tribunal
Service carries out the decision made as I have spent years trying
to find out . What I have found there is noone legal overseeing
their maladministration to point it is now corrupted . Who is able
to resolve problems and injustice when staff for Government appear
to be on remits not to.This I have just had from Parliamentary
Ombudsman who just reitterate their role and what can't do??Then
blame and so rude put phone down .In a democracy?

Yours faithfully,

Julie Shrive

Link to this | Send follow up

Data Access & Compliance Unit
The Tribunals Service

8 June 2009

This is an Auto Reply from the Data Access & Compliance Unit.

Thank you for your e-mail.

If your message was a request for information please be advised that
your request is being dealt with and you will receive a written
ackowledgement shortly.

Data Access & Compliance Unit
Information Directorate

Ministry of Justice
6th Floor, Zone B, Postal Point 6.23
102 Petty France
London
SW1H 9AJ

Fax: 0203 334 2245

E-mail: [email address]

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

show quoted sections

Link to this | Reply to this message

You left an annotation (10 June 2009)

NB

I am coming to the Home Office to resolve all problems of organisations everywhere functioning like call centres with no discretion . In a democratic country is the Home Office trying to dodge the issue . Typical . Why lack integrity ? How do you intend resolving as you seem incapable of knowing what is right or wrong?So will have to go to PM's office as IFO has same unreasonable structure .

Link to this

Ben Jones left an annotation (10 June 2009)

Why do you think the Home Office has responsibility for this?

Link to this

You left an annotation (11 June 2009)

Perhaps this arrogant person would have the decency to point me in the right direction or does he know a there is no regulation, and that monitoring to ascertain there no corruption or bias with taxpayers money, doesn't exist .

Does he not think it is serious working fo ran organisation that is set up to resolve , taking a wage for maladministrating as has no knowledge of named officers.

Link to this

Julie Shrive

22 June 2009

Dear Sir or Madam,

Why are data , access & compliance dealing with this serious issue
- typical Is it legal to have noone legal overseeing that
judgements are carried out & as for letter just received where
you've deliberately misinterpreted what was said oh dear . As for
Judicial review you've all deliberately destroyed evidence so you
do not have to address your illegal actions which police refuse to
address too . Surely fraud?So request an Internal Review . Will you
be contracting them in?

Yours sincerely,

Julie Shrive

Link to this | Send follow up

Data Access & Compliance Unit
The Tribunals Service

22 June 2009

This is an Auto Reply from the Data Access & Compliance Unit.

Thank you for your e-mail.

If your message was a request for information please be advised that
your request is being dealt with and you will receive a written
ackowledgement shortly.

Data Access & Compliance Unit
Information Directorate

Ministry of Justice
6th Floor, Zone B, Postal Point 6.23
102 Petty France
London
SW1H 9AJ

Fax: 0203 334 2245

E-mail: [email address]

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

show quoted sections

Link to this | Reply to this message

Julie Shrive

23 June 2009

Dear Sir or Madam,

Is this a democratic society or fascist regime?What date was my
question asked & how has the issue been resolved or are you only
interested in process with no discretion ? Why have you said on
system am Appealing when it is Nottingham defrauding not giving the
backdating and Admin court who sent all documents unsigned by the
legal person maladministrating time -- I have a legal expert
witness German who is horrified who says emigrate. . I am not I
want litigation but without my evidence dating back to 1997 NB
Affadavit that Royal Courts of Justice deliberately destroyed I
don't think going to get a FAIR HEARING ??!! Already ignored
CARDIAC symptons resulting in CARDIAC ARREST !!!This is
professional and medical negligence that the lawyers refuse to help
with. Why ??!!Are they lining their pockets too??!!Who not on remit
or contract is going to sort this out?

Yours sincerely,

Julie Shrive

Link to this | Send follow up

Data Access & Compliance Unit
The Tribunals Service

23 June 2009

This is an Auto Reply from the Data Access & Compliance Unit.

Thank you for your e-mail.

If your message was a request for information please be advised that
your request is being dealt with and you will receive a written
ackowledgement shortly.

Data Access & Compliance Unit
Information Directorate

Ministry of Justice
6th Floor, Zone B, Postal Point 6.23
102 Petty France
London
SW1H 9AJ

Fax: 0203 334 2245

E-mail: [email address]

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

show quoted sections

Link to this | Reply to this message

Data Access & Compliance Unit
The Tribunals Service

23 June 2009

Please can you forward me your FOI reference no so I can check our
system?

Regards

Data Access and Compliance Unit
6TH floor 102 Petty France.
Post point 6.25
London
SW1H 9AJ

show quoted sections

Link to this | Reply to this message

Julie Shrive

23 June 2009

Dear Data Access & Compliance Unit,

Is this how you address serious issues and problems bullying .
Outrageous a torture by negligence unit ! Number ??!!! You are
wasting tax payers money .

Yours sincerely,

Julie Shrive

Link to this | Send follow up

Data Access & Compliance Unit
The Tribunals Service

23 June 2009

This is an Auto Reply from the Data Access & Compliance Unit.

Thank you for your e-mail.

If your message was a request for information please be advised that
your request is being dealt with and you will receive a written
ackowledgement shortly.

Data Access & Compliance Unit
Information Directorate

Ministry of Justice
6th Floor, Zone B, Postal Point 6.23
102 Petty France
London
SW1H 9AJ

Fax: 0203 334 2245

E-mail: [email address]

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

show quoted sections

Link to this | Reply to this message

Data Access & Compliance Unit
The Tribunals Service

23 June 2009

We need the reference number to track progress of the request.

Regards

Data Access and Compliance Unit
6TH floor 102 Petty France.
Post point 6.25
London
SW1H 9AJ

show quoted sections

Link to this | Reply to this message

What best describes the status of this request now?

I'm still waiting for the internal review
They are going to reply by post
The review has finished and overall:

They do not have the information (maybe they say who does)
I've received some of the information
I've received all the information
My request has been rejected
I've received an error message
(and we'll suggest what to do next)

Things to do with this request

Anyone:

The Tribunals Service only:
Respond to request
Contact WhatDoTheyKnow | Built by mySociety ... and you | Dedicated to Chris Lightfoot

Yours sincerely,

Julie Shrive

SSAC DWP New Court,

Dear Ms Shrive
As I explained in my previous email, the SSAC cannot help you with your
enquiry. I can only suggest that you seek assistance from an independent
advice agency, such as your local Citizens Advice Bureau.
Regards
Gill Saunders

show quoted sections

Julie Shrive (Account suspended)

Dear SSAC DWP New Court,

If you don't know how am I supposed to and I am paying your salary Not good enough.Complying with fraud.

Yours sincerely,

Julie Shrive

Ben Jones left an annotation ()

Again yu are getting rude when you don't like a response. You are asking for information under a specific piece of legislation, something which yu accept by the mere fact that yu are using this website. Yet you continue to peruse organizations by asking inappropriate questions from the wrong public authorities.

It would be so much easier for all concerned if you were to clearly state what your problem was without recourse to abbreviations and rather mysterious references to lost paperwork and your MA.

I've said this before in another annotation either contact the CAB for advice, or go to your loacl or even national newspaper they are always looking for an excuse to bash hard working public sector workers. Maybe that will get you the publicity and teh resolution you need.

apologies for the bad spelling as like you I too am dyspraxic and duslexic

Julie Shrive (Account suspended) left an annotation ()

Who are you what is your position or are you poking your nose into another persons business without permission , as your advice I have done & caused the problem you have no idea how to resolve or understand right and wrong ??!!! No wonder going round and round in circles .

Looking for an EU Authority?

You can request documents directly from EU Institutions at our sister site AskTheEU.org . Find out more .

AskTheEU.org