Family Court Policies?

Musa made this Freedom of Information request to Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service

This request has been closed to new correspondence from the public body. Contact us if you think it ought be re-opened.

Waiting for an internal review by Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service of their handling of this request.

Dear Sir or Madam,

Is there any PROOF that Her Majesty's Courts Service has a policy of being open, honest, transparent and accountable?

Also, can you explain - if so - HOW they are

(a) OPEN (b) HONEST (c) TRANSPARENT (d) ACCOUNTABLE ?

Also, can you explain WHY social workers are NEVER arrested and charged for providing false evidence in a court of law with regard to all the lies they invent in order to bolster their reports?

Also, WHY do social services and the courts accept HEARSAY with NO FORENSIC EVIDENCE to back up serious claims made? For example, an x-wife who used to falsely blame the innocent husband for domestic violence when in fact SHE was the violent and aggressive abuser?

Musa

Customer Services \(CSHQ\),

Dear Sir/Madam

Thank you for your email.

We are responsible for the administration of the courts.

I cannot comment on any case that has been before the courts so I am
unable to assist you.

Yours faithfully

Miss Angela Lue-Taim
Her Majesty's Court Service
Customer Service Unit
1st Floor, Zone C
102 Petty France
London
SW1H 9AJ

show quoted sections

Dear Sir or Madam,

DO NOT PLAY GAMES OF RHETORIC WITH SUCH A QUESTION!

ARE YOU INSANE? A QUESTION I FEEL I MUST ASK, SINCE ANY PERSON OF SOUND MIND CAN CLEARLY SEE THAT THE LEAST FOCUS IN THE QUESTION IS THAT LAST "EXAMPLE" I PROVIDED IN ORDER TO MERELY STRENGTHEN THE POINT OF MY RIGHTFUL QUESTIONS!
I DEMAND AN ANSWER TO MY QUESTIONS, AND NOT A COMMENTARY ON MY EXAMPLE, WITHIN THE TIME OF THE 20 DAYS BY LAW FROM WHEN I INITIATED THIS SERIES OF QUESTIONS!

Yours faithfully,

Musa

Wilson, A (Account suspended) left an annotation ()

In 2007,local authorities in England applied for 8,173 care orders. 7,624 orders were made. 336 applications were withdrawn, 290 "no orders" decisions and 21 orders were refused.

In other words, the judgement of the social workers working for the council was so good, they were only refused by the judge 21 times (0.27%)

More importantly 93% of the time the judge merely rubber-stamped the care orders.

Musa left an annotation ()

Ah yes, i forgot... the system is bloody PERFECT and has NO FAULTS and NEVER lies or deceives; NOBODY EVER does time for things they never did wrong; the system PROTECTS us by attacking, murdering, raping and pillaging everybody else "before they do it to us"; the HUMANS who gave us the system and who keep it in its place really do CARE about us so much that they've even thought down to the smallest detail to use our tax paid monies to keep themselves happy on holidays around the world so they don't get bored with "looking after us"... Ah, yes... the good old rubber stamp of the system... HOW could i have not yet realised after 31 years on this planet that the system is WONDERFUL!

(Has somebody just taken a fat crap on the floor because i can smell something very unpleasant?)

Ms S Foster (Account suspended) left an annotation ()

House of Lords - Down Lisburn Health and Social Services Trust. Baroness Hale of Richmond. Judgement

34. There is, so far as the parties to this case are aware, no European jurisprudence questioning the principle of freeing for adoption, or indeed compulsory adoption generally. The United Kingdom is unusual amongst members of the Council of Europe in permitting the total severance of family ties without parental consent. (Professor Triseliotis thought that only Portugal and perhaps one other European country allowed this.) It is, of course, the most draconian interference with family life possible.

Although kinship placements are supposed to be the preferred option in this country, only 1 per cent. of social worker-instigated placements ended up with kinship carers, compared with 45 per cent. in Denmark, for example(EVIDENCE given in parliament June 16th 2008 by Tim Loughton MP shadow minister for children)

John Harris (Account suspended) left an annotation ()

How sad and shocking, families being destroyed forever in secret,
Are there any decent judges out there, or are the authorities out of control?
It is simply disgraceful.

http://nameshamesocialworkers.blogspot.c...

MEDWAY COUNTY FAMILY COURT 7th- 15th September 2009

Ex-Tory Councillor grandchildren Elle-May ,Ruby, Lacey, Poppy Williams-Piper being stolen for forced adoption by Kent County Council(Tory run)

Everyone welcome,ring side seats available for the press, come meet your local SS workers, not to be missed ,why not make it a regular event!

Dear Sir or Madam,

Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of Information reviews.

I am writing to request an internal review of Her Majesty's Courts Service's handling of my FOI request 'Family Court Policies?'.

A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is available on the Internet at this address:
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/fa...

Also, i wish to know the oath of office for a judge, and whether or not different types of judges in different (game) courts have different oaths and if so what they are word for word.
In particular, as well as the above general question, i wish to know the oath of office for circuit judges and high court of "justice?" family division judges.

I feel it is instrumental in getting anything close to real justice in these courts if i represent myself and if i know the oath of office of the judge. This will ensure me my full inalienable rights to some degree at least, unless the judge manages to deceive me into waiving them by a technicality of Law English.

Musa

Musa left an annotation ()

Hahaha... i recently found the word for the law world in Latin is "BOLLOX" and means "to throw into confusion"... very apt description, since the "law" world is very much fraud at best and works entirely on the foundations of deception. Every step of the "game" is deception on a grand scale!
Watch how they deceive you with WORDS alone! It's a mind control game:

"I'm bigger, better, stronger, smarter and more powerful than you because i wear these clothes, walk like this, speak like this, etc. etc."

It's ALL a MIND GAME!

I don't know about you, but i've seen plenty of men in wigs and dresses before... you can see them around Soho everywhere... and they certainly don't SCARE me, even though i disagree with their choices. So why would any other man in a wig and dress scare me?
That's the question!

Musa left an annotation ()

And what's going on with the FACT that "The Ministry of Justice" has been registered as a CORPORATION since 1600? It didn't even exist back then...

... DID IT!?

Customer Services \(CSHQ\),

Dear Musa

Thank you for your e-mail. I have forwarded it to the Departmental Data
Access and Compliance Unit for them to reply direct.

Russell Meek
Customer Service Unit
H M Courts Service
0845 4568770

show quoted sections

Customer Services \(CSHQ\),

Dear Sir/Madam,

I have forwarded your email to the Data Compliance and Access Unit for
reply.

I suggest that you contact them direct using their external email inbox
at [email address] or by writing to them at the following
address, Data Access and Compliance Unit, Information Directorate, 6th
Floor, 102 Petty France, London SW1H 9AJ.

Regards
HMCS, Customer Service Unit

show quoted sections

F Mason (Account suspended) left an annotation ()

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...

The comments on here made by the public are funny but true, nobody expects justice especially in family courts held behind closed doors

Musa left an annotation ()

They are attempting to do all they can possible to make it eventually next to impossible to act under lawful rebellion or simply as a sovereign freeman. However, it is important for everyone to keep in mind that no matter what they do they are only further deluding themselves and making it harder for the weak of heart and mind to become a freeman or act under lawful rebellion. Stay strong people!

Musa left an annotation ()

Furthermore, see how they love to deceive the masses with the usage of the word "law" to describe legislation! The modern day "plain English" meaning of the word "law" is used to include legislation because so long as you consider legislation as law you have consented to it. And it is well known that legislation is merely "given the force of law by the consent of the governed", which means you'd have to be mentally retarded to consider legislation as law because you cannot possibly give law the force of law by anything because law already has the force of law simply on the basis that it is law and therefore has the force of law by default of the fat it is law. You cannot give law the force of law if it already has the force of law simply because it is law, and that force it carries is what defines it as law. Therefore, legislation is clearly not law. And furthermore, it is only given that force by your consent. Not when you voted for such and such a party, no, because political parties bring in new policies even after they have been elected and since when did they ever leave it in our hands to decide or pass bills and acts of parliament? Never! That's what they do... so it isn't then that your consent is given, is it? So how about when the policeman arrests you? Does he say to you "Do you consent to such and such legislation so i can arrest you and have you in court to be fined or imprisoned for an act that is not unlawful by its very nature?"... Of course not! He is trained to use words that, more often than not, even he doesn't correctly comprehend which is why cases are often lost even when the policeman is convinced he's on a winner. So how does he get you to consent even though he himself may even be unaware of what is going on and will still unlawfully arrest you if you challenge him with the truth? He is trained to say before the cuffs go on: "You have the right to remain silent (the golden rule)! Anything you say may (must) be taken down and used against you as evidence in a court of law. Do you UNDERSTAND?".... So what do you say when he says "Do you UNDERSTAND?"... That's right... most people say "Yes!"... Big mistake! Say "NO!"... This is the first chess move of victory because in the court in front of a judge "UNDERSTAND" means "STAND UNDER"... Welcome to the world of the secret language of legal English, as found in Black's Law Dictionary (although published in America it is the world's international law/legal dictionary for the European Commonwealth). This is how they get your consent... through means of fraud!!!
Magna Carta based meanings for specific words in the context of modern English grammar with a lot of rhetoric is what makes legal English a very easy tool to use to commit fraud upon the masses and get them to bring the goods in on themselves by their own consent using legislation. This is an extortion racket designed to extort you of your rights, freedoms, liberties, labour, etc. in order to operate the United Kingdom Corporation Ltd. in a manner that means we are all used as slaves to work for the IMF to pay off the interest based loans that our corrupt government took out with them in the first place and lost all our gold as a result which now means men and women are the currency and labour for the IMF. Bank of England vaults are empty along with all other Western nations whose vaults are empty and whose people are slaves as a result.

Lawful rebellion is one way to get back at this corrupt system and whip the public SERVANTS back into shape by ending their extortion racket and slavery over us all.
Maybe then they will stop and realise who the real enemy are, not the innocent muslims who kept their gold due to interest being forbidden by islaam and therefore the IMF sends the bankrupt West to rape and pillage their lands for their gold and GNP and control over the muslim lands politically in favour of the IMF... it's the IMF and those behind it who are the true enemy... can't you even see this very simple truth? It is them who devised a clever plan to rob the world's gold and gain political power over the world through economics, it is them who formed parliament in every land using Britain as a base and put their own people in positions of power within those parliaments to ensure they never lose control of it, it is them who have enslaved the nations of the West and are making trouble around the world using these nations bankruptcy and debt to them as leverage... blah blah blah... just think about it... it is these very same people who came up with the idea to capitalize your name on the birth certificate (bond) making your name into a corporation that makes you a debtor sharing in the bankruptcy of The Crown (the British Crown in Temple Bar, not the Queen's crown) and therefore a slave working for worthless paper, and it is these very same people who have shares in your name, and it is these same people who decide legislation - new means by which to extort yet more labour, freedom, liberty, rights, etc. from you every day in order to make their own lives more luxurious and your life a misery with little purpose except to line their pockets and keep them happy. WAKE UP PEOPLE..!!! The muslims are not your enemies... you have been lied to in order to justify the mass robbery of good people you would otherwise never have warred against if you knew it was all really for these reasons!

Ms Wilson (Account suspended) left an annotation ()

Watch the CON-servative party and others appear to come to the rescue and raise this issue suddenly next year in order to get more votes. Dont be fooled they are all defacto and in this up to their necks and will use any issue to fool the sheeple.

What are any of them doing about this NOW - NOTHING

Musa left an annotation ()

Ms Wilson
Who said i believe any of those parties?
They are all fundamentally compulsive liars with no exception!
I am opposed to these oppressive grand illusionists and seek to expose them on every level.
Do your research, read Magna Carta (article 61 thereof), read the Universal Declaration of Human Rights Act - and just in case any lying Government agents try to make you believe that isn't binding on the UK, International Judge Goldstone from South Africa says it is well known that it is binding upon all countries who claim to be a "democracy"! Within it, lawful rebellion is mentioned as a right (we would still have this right even if it wasn't documented anywhere as it's one of our inalienable rights)!

WHO PAYS WHO? SO WHO SHOULD BE MASTER AND WHO SHOULD BE SERVANT OR SLAVE, IN THIS CASE? WHO HAS THE REAL POWER OF "NO!", IN THIS CASE???
LAWFUL REBELLION IS EASY... MUCH OF IT IS SIMPLY ABOUT SAYING "NO!" (HOWEVER, THERE IS A PARTICULAR CALCULATED METHOD) AND ESTABLISHING THAT WITH DELUDED PEOPLE WHO ARE UNDER THE IMPRESSION THEY HAVE AUTHORITY OVER YOU AND WITHOUT YOUR CONSENT EVEN ENTERING INTO IT!!!

RESEARCH LAWFUL REBELLION AND RESEARCH THE FREEMAN REVIVAL MOVEMENT (FORGET THOSE CORPORATE ELITISTS WHO HAVE TURNED BEING A FREEMAN INTO SOME KIND OF CORPORATE MONEY CLUB, LOOK INTO THE TRUE FREEMEN SUCH AS my self, robert menard, john harris, etc.