Facial recognition used at the Download Music Festival, Donington

Pippa King made this Freedom of Information request to Leicestershire Constabulary

This request has been closed to new correspondence. Contact us if you think it should be reopened.

The request was successful.

Dear Leicestershire Constabulary,

Under the Freedom of Information Act please could you supply the following information within 20 working days.

As per this article ‘First time for facial recognition at music festival’ https://www.policeoracle.com/news/First-...

1) Please advise which companies are supplying the facial recognition hardware and software?
2) Please advise how this facial recognition system funded?
3) How long has Leicestershire Police had access to this facial recognition System?
4) Which ‘database of custody images from across Europe’ is the facial recognition system accessing?
5) Please provide a picture of the cameras.

In the article - “DC Kevin Walker said: “It is one of the first times it has been trialled outside, normally it is done in a controlled environment” “

6) Please advise how many times and the dates of the facial recognition trials in a “controlled environment”.
7) Please advise what consists of a “controlled environment”.
8) Which databases were accessed in the “controlled environment”?
9) Please advise which other festivals have shown ‘a lot of interest’.
10) Please provide any minutes of meetings or any records pertaining to the deployment of this system at the Donington Download Festival.
11) Who authorised use of facial recognition at the Donington Download Festival?
12) Please provide the Privacy Impact Assessment for this facial recognition system and the NeoFace facial recognition system.

Neoface: As of a 15th January 2015 Freedom of Information Response from yourselves “The Neoface trial began in April and is still ongoing. “

13) Please advise, has the trial finished?
14) Please advise if Leicestershire Police decided to purchase NeoFace?
15) Please provide any evaluation of the trial.

Some parts of this request may be easier to answer than others and in such case please could you release available data as soon as possible rather than delay the entire request.

If you are not fully certain of what it is I am asking then I look forward to contact from you as soon as possible to clarify what it is I am requesting in order to meet your obligations under the law.

If the costs of processing this request exceed the limit in the Act, please advise on what information you are able to supply within the cost limit.

Yours faithfully,

Pippa King

Booth Christine,

Dear Pippa


RE:‘First time for facial recognition at music festival.


I acknowledge receipt of your request for information under the Freedom of
Information Act 2000.

 This is receiving our attention and a response will be sent to you in due
course and within the specified time

Kind Regards

Chris Booth

Information Management

Leicestershire Police EXT 5222

[email address]

Website: www.leics.police.uk


show quoted sections


Visible links
1. http://www.neighbourhoodlink.co.uk/
2. http://www.leics.police.uk/support
3. http://www.leics.police.uk/haveyoursay

Dear Leicestershire Constabulary,

Re: Facial recognition used at the Download Music Festival, Donington - Freedom of Information Request

This is a polite reminder that my Freedom of Information Request sent 12th June 2015 is now overdue. Please could you send the information I requested or conduct an Internal Review as to why there is no response to this request.

I appreciate police forces are busy and I am grateful for your time on this.

Yours faithfully,

Pippa King

Data Protection, Leicestershire Constabulary

2 Attachments



Good morning


Please find attached our response to your Freedom of Information request.
Please accept my apologies for the delay in getting back to you



Kind regards


Steven Morris

Disclosure Manager

Information Management

Professional Standards


Email: [1][email address]

Tel  Ext: 5221

Fax Ext: 5207




show quoted sections


Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
2. http://www.leics.police.uk/
3. http://www.neighbourhoodlink.co.uk/
4. http://www.leics.police.uk/support
5. http://www.leics.police.uk/haveyoursay

J Roberts left an annotation ()

Clearview - a company used by the police - fined more than £7.5m in respect of its database that matches facial images - May '22


Biometrics Commissioner - 16/2/23

The use of overt surveillance camera systems in public places by police forces in England and Wales: An assessment of compliance with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 and the Surveillance Camera Code of Practice

'8. Not all respondents have completed data protection impact assessments for all the technology under discussion in this survey. This is a concern, particularly given the government’s position that much of the work currently undertaken by the Surveillance Camera Commissioner is a data protection issue, and already falls under the remit of the ICO notwithstanding any legislative proposals to abolished (sic) the Surveillance Camera Code by the Data Protection and Digital Information Bill.'


Commissioner for the Retention and Use of Biometric Material Annual Report - January 2021 – March 2022


Surveillance Camera Commissioner Annual Report March 2021 – March 2022

February 2023

'84. More worrying is the reported use of images of people who, while having been arrested, have never subsequently been charged or summonsed, for comparison against Live Facial Recognition ‘reads‘ and watchlists. As I record in Part 2 of this report, the use of facial recognition technology by the police has become one of the most contentious areas of biometric surveillance, not just in the UK but globally .

Part 2 – Facial Recognition and AI

96. The objective of the event was to gain a better understanding of how facial recognition technology is perceived by society in a policing and law enforcement context. Speaking at the event were the Forensic Science Regulator, a senior lecturer from Sheffield University and representatives from the Biometrics Institute, the Information Commissioner’s Office, South Wales Police, and Big Brother Watch.

Appendix F: Facial recognition and AI'


Initial analysis of the 2022 police survey returns
Published 14 November 2022

Is your force operating Facial Recognition Technology?

'Only one force stated that it was using LFR (from the list supplied). Six had access to PND and two of those to CAID. One other mentioned access to Athena.'


Live facial recognition technology guidance published


The Biometrics and Surveillance Camera Commissioner's response to the College of Policing APP on Live Facial Recognition - 6/4/22


Chief Constables’ Council

Title: National Biometrics Function and National Facial Recognition Project - 30/9/21


Who's Watching You? Report by Big Brother Watch - 7/2/22


'Police forces were reluctant to answer questions about any advanced capabilities, while some refused to say if they used Chinese brands at all'

Biometrics Commissioner - 15/2/23

UK policing 'shot through' with Chinese surveillance technology


'A Mail on Sunday investigation discovered CCTV cameras – which have also been banned by the US military amid concerns they could be used to send vital data back to Beijing's spies – at numerous military sites, including barracks for elite troops who guard the King.'


Fact Sheet on live facial recognition used by police Home Office 2019