Facial Recognition Use and Related Documentation
Dear Cumbria Constabulary,
Please could you confirm if the force is using live and/or retrospective facial recognition technology, or is planning to in the next 12 months?
If you are using facial recognition, which supplier(s) have you contracted with?
Please share copies of your policy, standard operating procedure and DPIA along with any other related documentation.
Yours faithfully,
Fred
Thank you for your email which has today been received by Cumbria
Constabulary.
If your message relates to a request for information under the Freedom of
Information Act 2000, please accept this message as an acknowledgement of
receipt and you will receive a response to your request within 20 working
days.
If your email does not relate to a request for information, but requires a
response, you will be contacted after the content of your email has been
reviewed.
This is an automated email. Please do not respond to it. If at any point
you would like to discuss your email Please call the Data Control Unit on:
- 101 (Police Force Cumbria) Option 2 : ext 60025.
IMPORTANT NOTICE:
This email, its content and any file transmitted with it, may be
confidential/legally privileged, and are for the intended recipient only.
It may contain information protected by law. Any unauthorised copying,
disclosure or other processing of this information may be unlawful and may
be a criminal offence. If you have received this email in error please
advise Cumbria Constabulary on 101 or via email return, and delete this
email and any attachments immediately. Any opinions expressed in this
document are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
opinion of Cumbria Constabulary.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been scanned by
Exchange Online Protection for the presence of computer viruses.
_______________________________________________________
Please, consider your environmental responsibility. Before printing this
e-mail ask yourself: "Do I need a hard copy?"
Thank you for your email which has today been received by Cumbria
Constabulary.
Due to the Coronavirus/COVID 19 pandemic and the changing circumstances
for all, the Unit must prioritise essential safeguarding work for the
health and social care sector, and also for the Family Court. Delays in
other areas are likely to occur and may fall outside any statutory or
other expected timescales. We apologise for any inconvenience this may
cause, we will of course endeavour to process your request as soon as
practicable. If your request is not urgent or can be retracted at any
stage please let us know as soon as possible.
This is an automated email. Please do not respond to it. If at any point
you would like to discuss your email
Please call the Data Control Unit on: - 101 (Police Force Cumbria) Option
2 : ext 60025.
IMPORTANT NOTICE:
This email, its content and any file transmitted with it, may be
confidential/legally privileged, and are for the intended recipient only.
It may contain information protected by law. Any unauthorised copying,
disclosure or other processing of this information may be unlawful and may
be a criminal offence. If you have received this email in error please
advise Cumbria Constabulary on 101 or via email return, and delete this
email and any attachments immediately. Any opinions expressed in this
document are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
opinion of Cumbria Constabulary.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been scanned by
Exchange Online Protection for the presence of computer viruses.
_______________________________________________________
Please, consider your environmental responsibility. Before printing this
e-mail ask yourself: "Do I need a hard copy?"
Dear Fred,
Thank you for your email. Please would you be able to provide us with your surname also? Under Freedom of Information Guidance, we kindly request the full name of the applicant, before we are able to log the request.
Kind regards,
Dominique Robinson,
FOI Team
Thank you for your email which has today been received by Cumbria
Constabulary.
If your message relates to a request for information under the Freedom of
Information Act 2000, please accept this message as an acknowledgement of
receipt and you will receive a response to your request within 20 working
days.
If your email does not relate to a request for information, but requires a
response, you will be contacted after the content of your email has been
reviewed.
This is an automated email. Please do not respond to it. If at any point
you would like to discuss your email Please call the Data Control Unit on:
- 101 (Police Force Cumbria) Option 2 : ext 60025.
IMPORTANT NOTICE:
This email, its content and any file transmitted with it, may be
confidential/legally privileged, and are for the intended recipient only.
It may contain information protected by law. Any unauthorised copying,
disclosure or other processing of this information may be unlawful and may
be a criminal offence. If you have received this email in error please
advise Cumbria Constabulary on 101 or via email return, and delete this
email and any attachments immediately. Any opinions expressed in this
document are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
opinion of Cumbria Constabulary.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been scanned by
Exchange Online Protection for the presence of computer viruses.
_______________________________________________________
Please, consider your environmental responsibility. Before printing this
e-mail ask yourself: "Do I need a hard copy?"
Dear Fred Wright,
Thank you for your request. Please may I apologise with regards to the delay in your response. We were awaiting relevant information, relating to your request. Please see the attached response letter. Thanks again.
Kind Regards
Dominique Robinson
Public Access and Disclosure Decision Maker
Information Management
Digital, Data and Technology Command
Find us on...
Cumbria Constabulary
Police Headquarters, Carleton Hall, Penrith, Cumbria. CA10 2AU.
IMPORTANT NOTICE:
This email, its content and any file transmitted with it, may be confidential/legally privileged, and are for the intended recipient only. It may contain information protected by law. Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or other processing of this information may be unlawful and may be a criminal offence. If you have received this email in error please advise Cumbria Constabulary on 101 or via email return, and delete this email and any attachments immediately. Any opinions expressed in this document are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Cumbria Constabulary.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been scanned by Exchange Online Protection for the presence of computer viruses.
_______________________________________________________
Please, consider your environmental responsibility. Before printing this e-mail ask yourself: "Do I need a hard copy?"
J Roberts left an annotation ()
The Guardian 23/10/23:
'Hikvision, the Chinese surveillance firm identified by the UK government as a security threat, has “recommitted” to Britain after receiving clarification that a ban on its cameras being positioned at sensitive sites does not extend to public authorities or police stations.'
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023...
Clearview AI Inc v The Information Commissioner [2023] UKFTT 819 (GRC)
17/10/23
1. We have concluded that the Information Commissioner (“the Commissioner”) did not have jurisdiction to issue the Enforcement Notice and the Monetary Penalty Notice to Clearview AI Inc (referred to herein as “CV”) because although the processing undertaken by CV was related to the monitoring of data subjects’ behaviour in the United Kingdom, the processing is beyond the material scope of the GDPR and is not relevant processing for the purposes of Article 3 UK GDPR.
13. ...CV further submits that the Service is an Internet Search
Engine service which is offered exclusively to foreign (i.e. non-UK/EU) criminal law enforcement and national security agencies, and their contractors...
40. CV’s Database contains billions of images. The size grows according to the number of images copied by the scrapers. In October 2022 it was estimated that the Database included over 20 billion images and increasing as new images are scraped. We were provided with an estimate of a growth rate of 75 million images per day.
62. CV offered its Service on a trial basis to law enforcement/government organisations within the UK between June 2019 and March 2020. There were 721 searches made in that trial phase. This “UK Test Phase” took place before the end of the transition period associated with the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union. There is no suggestion that the Service has been offered to customers established within the UK since that time.
63. The UK Test Phase is not relied upon by the Commissioner as part of the alleged infringements but as an indication that there are images of UK residents held within the CV Database...
115. The heart of this case, in the Commissioner’s submissions, is that the Service is being used to monitor the behaviour of data subjects. If we are not satisfied about that his case will fail, therefore we consider that aspect first.
144. For all of these reasons we find that that CV’s processing is related to the monitoring carried out by the clients because...
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/...
Panopticon:
https://panopticonblog.com/2023/10/18/cl...
We work to defend the right to FOI for everyone
Help us protect your right to hold public authorities to account. Donate and support our work.
Donate Now
J Roberts left an annotation ()
Clearview - a company used by the police - fined more than £7.5m in respect of its database that matches facial images - May '22
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/c...
Biometrics Commissioner - 16/2/23
The use of overt surveillance camera systems in public places by police forces in England and Wales: An assessment of compliance with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 and the Surveillance Camera Code of Practice
'8. Not all respondents have completed data protection impact assessments for all the technology under discussion in this survey. This is a concern, particularly given the government’s position that much of the work currently undertaken by the Surveillance Camera Commissioner is a data protection issue, and already falls under the remit of the ICO notwithstanding any legislative proposals to abolished (sic) the Surveillance Camera Code by the Data Protection and Digital Information Bill.'
https://www.gov.uk/government/publicatio...
Commissioner for the Retention and Use of Biometric Material Annual Report - January 2021 – March 2022
And
Surveillance Camera Commissioner Annual Report March 2021 – March 2022
February 2023
'84. More worrying is the reported use of images of people who, while having been arrested, have never subsequently been charged or summonsed, for comparison against Live Facial Recognition ‘reads‘ and watchlists. As I record in Part 2 of this report, the use of facial recognition technology by the police has become one of the most contentious areas of biometric surveillance, not just in the UK but globally .
Part 2 – Facial Recognition and AI
96. The objective of the event was to gain a better understanding of how facial recognition technology is perceived by society in a policing and law enforcement context. Speaking at the event were the Forensic Science Regulator, a senior lecturer from Sheffield University and representatives from the Biometrics Institute, the Information Commissioner’s Office, South Wales Police, and Big Brother Watch.
Appendix F: Facial recognition and AI'
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk...
Initial analysis of the 2022 police survey returns
Published 14 November 2022
Is your force operating Facial Recognition Technology?
'Only one force stated that it was using LFR (from the list supplied). Six had access to PND and two of those to CAID. One other mentioned access to Athena.'
https://www.gov.uk/government/publicatio...
Live facial recognition technology guidance published
22/3/22
https://www.college.police.uk/article/li...
The Biometrics and Surveillance Camera Commissioner's response to the College of Policing APP on Live Facial Recognition - 6/4/22
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/the-b...
Chief Constables’ Council
Title: National Biometrics Function and National Facial Recognition Project - 30/9/21
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/8...
Who's Watching You? Report by Big Brother Watch - 7/2/22
https://bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/wp-conten...
'Police forces were reluctant to answer questions about any advanced capabilities, while some refused to say if they used Chinese brands at all'
Biometrics Commissioner - 15/2/23
UK policing 'shot through' with Chinese surveillance technology
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-po...
Update (21/3/23):
'We note that the survey returns gave the impression that 2 forces were using Hikvision body worn cameras. However, subsequent enquiries have shown that to be incorrect. Consequently, the Biometrics and Surveillance Camera Commissioner can report that none of the forces who replied to the survey used body worn cameras manufactured by Hikvision.'
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-po...
'A Mail on Sunday investigation discovered CCTV cameras – which have also been banned by the US military amid concerns they could be used to send vital data back to Beijing's spies – at numerous military sites, including barracks for elite troops who guard the King.'
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article...
Fact Sheet on live facial recognition used by police Home Office 2019
https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov....
West Midlands Police trialling live-stream body-cams
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/w...
Baross Goldie 'answered' this question from Lord Alton of Liverpool:
UIN HL5880
'To ask His Majesty's Government why CCTV cameras made by Hikvision and Dahua have not yet been removed from UK army bases, following the direction to do so by the Ministry of Defence in November 2021.'
https://questions-statements.parliament....
Daily Express 4/5/23:
New security threat as GCHQ offices exposed as using Chinese-made CCTV cameras
https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/...
Guardian 16/5/23:
'Ministers are calling for facial recognition technology to be “embedded” in everyday policing, including potentially linking it to the body-worn cameras officers use as they patrol streets.
The Met used LFR at the coronation resulting in one arrest from 68,000 faces scanned, figures show. Three sites were set up, with LFR cameras close to the Savoy and Bridge Street in Westminster, which scanned nearly 38,000 faces and produced no alerts against a list of 10,451 people police regarded as suspects.
An LFR camera set up in Piccadilly scanned 30,633 faces, produced two alerts, one of which led to an arrest and one of which led to no further action. The Met data claims there were no false alerts.'
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023...