Freedom of Information Team
Department of Health and Social Care
39 Victoria Street
London SW1H 0EU
www.gov.uk/dhsc
Dr Anne McCloskey
By email to
: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx
14 June 2023
Dear Dr McCloskey,
Freedom of Information Request Reference FOI-1451893
Thank you for your request dated 5 May to the Department of Health and Social Care
(DHSC), a copy of which can be found in the accompanying annex.
Your request has been handled under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) and we
apologise for the delay in replying.
Section 12(2) of the FOIA means public authorities are not obliged to comply with a
request for information if it estimates the cost of complying would exceed the appropriate
limit. The appropriate limit for the DHSC is set at £600, which represents the cost of one
person spending 24 working hours determining whether we hold the information.
In this instance, to determine if all the information requested is held, we would be required
to locate, retrieve and review all documents relating to the safety of vaccines, as well as
locate, retrieve and review all peer review papers and studies. We have estimated that the
cost of this work would exceed the appropriate limit. Consequently, we will not be
answering your request.
Although we cannot answer your request now, we may be able to answer a refined
request within the cost limit. You may wish to consider, for example, specifying one type of
document you are interested in (such as briefings received by the minister), as well as
sending individual questions as your questions combined are bringing the request over the
cost limit. Please be aware that we cannot guarantee at this stage that a refined request
would fall within the FOIA cost limit, or that other exemptions will not apply.
On a discretionary basis, and outside the scope of the FOIA, you may be interested to
know that each COVID-19 vaccine is assessed by teams of scientists and clinicians and is
only authorised once it has met robust standards of effectiveness, safety and quality set by
the medicines regulator, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency
(MHRA).
You may also be interested in the following publicly accessible information, which sets out
the proactive safety surveillance strategy that the MHRA has put into place to monitor the
safety of all UK-approved COVID-19 vaccines post authorisation:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/report-of-the-commission-on-human-
medicines-expert-working-group-on-covid-19-vaccine-safety-surveillance/report-of-the-
commission-on-human-medicines-expert-working-group-on-covid-19-vaccine-safety-
surveillance
If you are not satisfied with the handling of your request, you have the right to appeal by
asking for an internal review. This should be sent to
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx.xx or
to the address at the top of this letter and be submitted within two months of the date of
this letter.
Please remember to quote the reference number above in any future communication.
If you are not content with the outcome of your internal review, you may complain directly
to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO). Generally, the ICO cannot make a
decision unless you have already appealed our original response and received our internal
review decision. You should raise your concerns with the ICO within three months of your
last meaningful contact with us.
Guidance on contacting the ICO can be found at
https://ico.org.uk/global/contact-us and
information about making a complaint can be found a
t https://ico.org.uk/make-a-complaint. Yours sincerely,
Freedom of Information Team
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx.xx
Annex
From: Dr. Anne Mc Closkey xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx
Sent: 05 May 2023 13:03
To: FreedomofInformation xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx.xx
Subject: Freedom of Information request - Evidence supporting Maria Caulfield's
statement to parliament that the Covid-19 vaccines are safe and effective and save lives
Dear Department of Health and Social Care, NOTICE-FOR-FREEDOM OF-
INFORMATION-2000
FOR-THE-PUBLIC-RECORD
mary anne: mccloskey:
acting in her capacity as ‘Dr Anne McCloskey’
5th May 2023
By Freedom of Information Act 2000 via whatdotheyknow.com
maria: caulfield: living woman
doing business as (dba) MARIA CAULFIELD acting as Parliamentary-Under-Secretary-of
State-for-Health-and-Social-Care acting in her capacity as ‘Maria Caulfield’
Department of Health
Parliament Buildings,
London.
RE:
COVID-19 – ALL evidence for Maria Caulfield’s claim in parliament on Tuesday 13th
December that “…the thing that made the biggest difference in combating covid was the
introduction of the vaccine…..safe and effective vaccines have underpinned our strategy
for living with covid…..in countries with lower vaccination rates, their ability to open up,
move on and live with covid was reduced…..vaccines remain our biggest line of
defense….all the vaccines used in the UK are safe and effective…..extensive data shows
that the vaccine is safe and highly effective in reducing deaths that we sadly saw during
the pandemic….I want to put it on the record that covid vaccines have saved tens of
thousands of lives and prevented hundreds of thousands of people from being
hospitalised….”
WHEREAS ‘Vaccines: Potential Harms’ was debated in the Westminster UK Parliament
on Tuesday 13 December 2022
andrew: bridgen: in his capacity as MP stated “The gold standard of understanding the
benefit and harm of any drug is the randomised controlled trial. It was the randomised
controlled trial conducted by Pfizer that led to UK and international regulators approving
the BioNTech-Pfizer mRNA vaccine for administration in the first place.
Contrary to popular belief, that original trial of approximately 40,000 participants did not
show any statistically significant reduction in death as a result of vaccination, but it did
show a 95% relative risk reduction in the development of infection against the ancestral,
more lethal strain of the virus [i.e. virus = SARS-CoV-2 the alleged causative agent for
COVID-19].
However, the absolute risk reduction for an individual was only 0.84%. In other words,
from its own data, Pfizer revealed that we needed to vaccinate 119 people to prevent one
infection. The World Health Organisation and the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges
have previously stated and made it clear that it is an ethical responsibility that medical
information is communicated to patients in absolute benefit and absolute risk terms, which
is to protect the public from unnecessary anxiety and manipulation.” …
UK Parliament HANSARD Vaccines: Potential Harms Volume 724
https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhansard.parliament.
uk%2FCommons%2F2022-12-13%2Fdebates%2FEAB2E8A2-A721-47DD-A79C-
4EFD10F10C2D%2FVaccinesPotentialHarmsdata=05%7C01%7Cdhmail%40dhsc.gov.uk
%7C88381672a884454eec0f08db4d6edbea%7C61278c3091a84c318c1fef4de8973a1c%
7C1%7C0%7C638188910746906489%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLj
AwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7Cs
data=RZuIhBO6FYwlaXBN2e2%2BCgNiniPEIuGHnr7P513CfEk%3Dreserved=0
Similar findings from: The Lancet ‘COVID-19 vaccine efficacy and effectiveness—the
elephant (not) in the room’
Piero Olliaro, Els Torreele, Michel Vaillant Open Access Published: April 20,
2021DOI:https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2
F10.1016%2FS2666-
5247data=05%7C01%7Cdhmail%40dhsc.gov.uk%7C88381672a884454eec0f08db4d6edb
ea%7C61278c3091a84c318c1fef4de8973a1c%7C1%7C0%7C638188910746906489%7C
Unknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haW
wiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7Csdata=WT96EXpwQXR7QIrWr%2Fb1JGz8
SePt%2BC8smzY75yknDC4%3Dreserved=0(21)00069-0
WHEREAS ‘Vaccines: Potential Harms’ was debated in the Westminster UK Parliament
on Tuesday 13 December 2022
WHEREAS After Pfizer’s CEO albert: bourla: declined to appear before the European
Parliament’s special committee on COVID-19 (“COVI”) to answer questions regarding
Pfizer’s COVID-19 “vaccine”, janine: small: acting as a senior Pfizer executive and as
Pfizer’s’ President of International Developed Markets’ attended a parliamentary hearing
on 10 October 2022 in his stead.
rob: roos: in his capacity as a Member of the European Parliament MEP from the
Netherlands asked janine: small: a simple “yes” or “no” question:
- “Was the Pfizer COVID vaccine tested on stopping the transmission of the virus before it
entered the market?”
In response to rob: roos;’s question janine: small: on behalf of Pfizer answered:
- “No.”
This removed the entire legal basis for the Covid passport, according to rob: roos: MEP.
“This is scandalous. Millions of people worldwide felt forced to get vaccinated because of
the myth that ‘you do it for others’.”
In a tweet on 11 October 2022 he stated:
“In COVID hearing, #Pfizer director admits: #vaccine was never tested on preventing
transmission.
Get vaccinated for others was always a lie.
The only purpose of the #COVID passport: forcing people to get vaccinated.
The world needs to know….”
Full video and text
https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2FRob
_Roos%2Fstatus%2F1579759795225198593data=05%7C01%7Cdhmail%40dhsc.gov.uk
%7C88381672a884454eec0f08db4d6edbea%7C61278c3091a84c318c1fef4de8973a1c%
7C1%7C0%7C638188910746906489%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLj
AwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7Cs
data=iQ9%2BAj8VehRQ22ijnVRrKNZZcXffzzcQ0ZyjR5zrOXk%3Dreserved=0
WHEREAS in an email excerpt published on 24 October 2004 rob: roos: in his capacity as
MEP added:
“Governments worldwide have introduced Covid mandates and passports that had an
enormous impact on millions of people. They did so by explicitly arguing that vaccinated
people cause less transmission of the virus. Ms. Small's [Pfizer’s President of International
Markets] response to my question proves this was an assumption by governments for
which no evidence had been provided.”
*https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffullfact.org%2Fheal
th%2Fcoronavirus-vaccine-pfizer-transmission-
test%2Fdata=05%7C01%7Cdhmail%40dhsc.gov.uk%7C88381672a884454eec0f08db4d6
edbea%7C61278c3091a84c318c1fef4de8973a1c%7C1%7C0%7C638188910746906489
%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik
1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7Csdata=XMw%2BTZ27fYgpDhGk%2Fr
eOgNovO1TjNs%2B24BK58Jzu4Gc%3Dreserved=0 *this entity receives funding from
Facebook, Google, etc.
WHEREAS “Relative risk reduction and absolute risk reduction measures in the
evaluation of clinical trial data are poorly understood by health professionals and the
public.
The absence of reported absolute risk reduction in COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials can
lead to OUTCOME-REPORTING-BIAS that AFFECTS-THE-INTERPRETATION-OF-
VACCINE-EFFICACY. The present article uses clinical epidemiologic tools to critically
appraise reports of efficacy in Pfzier/BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 mRNA vaccine
clinical trials. “
Based on data reported by the manufacturer for Pfzier/BioNTech vaccine BNT162b2, this
critical appraisal shows:
- “relative risk reduction, 95.1% …
- absolute risk reduction, 0.7%... “
“For the Moderna vaccine mRNA-1273, the appraisal shows: relative risk reduction,
94.1% … absolute risk reduction, 1.1% …
Unreported absolute risk reduction measures of 0.7% and 1.1% for the Pfzier/BioNTech
and Moderna vaccines, respectively, are very much lower than the reported relative risk
reduction measures. Reporting absolute risk reduction measures is essential to prevent
outcome reporting bias in evaluation of COVID-19 vaccine efficacy.” emphasis added
‘Outcome Reporting Bias in COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Clinical Trials’ Medicina
(Lithuania). 2021 Feb 26;57(3):199. doi: 10.3390/medicina57030199.
https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpubmed.ncbi.nlm.ni
h.gov%2F33652582%2Fdata=05%7C01%7Cdhmail%40dhsc.gov.uk%7C88381672a8844
54eec0f08db4d6edbea%7C61278c3091a84c318c1fef4de8973a1c%7C1%7C0%7C63818
8910746906489%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2l
uMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7Csdata=gmLgX4KxojR
SxrgX%2FjyYO%2FckbEGm9STtarYjl6lzKlg%3Dreserved=0
WHEREAS 08 June 2021 “The full extent of their COVID-19 vaccine indemnification
agreements with countries, however, is a closely guarded secret, one that has remained
highly confidential — until now. A leaked document … reveals the shocking terms of
Pfizer’s international COVID-19 vaccine agreements. …” An alleged agreement,
reportedly between Pfizer and Albania, was originally posted on Twitter and now is on
various websites.’
Safety and efficacy ‘not currently known’
“The purchaser of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine must also acknowledge two facts that have
largely been brushed under the rug: Both their efficacy and risks are unknown. According
to section 5.5 of the contract:
“Purchaser acknowledges that the Vaccine and materials related to the Vaccine, and their
components and constituent materials are being rapidly developed due to the emergency
circumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic and will continue to be studied after provision of
the Vaccine to Purchaser under this Agreement.”
“Purchaser further acknowledges that the long-term effects and efficacy of the Vaccine
are not currently known and that there may be adverse effects of the Vaccine that are not
currently known.”
“Leaked Document Reveals ‘Shocking’ Terms of Pfizer’s International Vaccine
Agreements.
08 June 2021
https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fchildrenshealthdefe
nse.org%2Fdefender%2Fleaked-document-terms-pfizers-international-vaccine-
agreements%2Fdata=05%7C01%7Cdhmail%40dhsc.gov.uk%7C88381672a884454eec0f
08db4d6edbea%7C61278c3091a84c318c1fef4de8973a1c%7C1%7C0%7C638188910746
906489%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJ
BTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7Csdata=8cetWqN%2BmkxNn0a
S6is6kcElD3pwsGF2RdsGpfdaAgA%3Dreserved=0
WHEREAS as reported by the BMJ on 21 October 2022, NONE of the Phase III trials for
COVID-19 vaccines including, but not limited to, Pfizer BNT162, Moderna mRNA-1273,
AstraZenica ZAZD1222, etc. were “designed to detect a reduction in any serious outcome
such as hospital admissions, use of intensive care, or deaths. Nor are the vaccines being
studied to determine whether they can interrupt transmission [person to person] of the
virus [SARS-Cov2].”
… “what will it mean exactly when a vaccine is declared “effective”?” …
‘Will covid-19 vaccines save lives? Current trials aren’t designed to tell us’ by Peter Doshi,
associate editor for British Medical Journal BMJ BMJ 2020; 371 doi:
https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.1136
%2Fbmj.m4037data=05%7C01%7Cdhmail%40dhsc.gov.uk%7C88381672a884454eec0f0
8db4d6edbea%7C61278c3091a84c318c1fef4de8973a1c%7C1%7C0%7C6381889107469
06489%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJB
TiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7Csdata=nJ0yYEM6xsI1UMv7q0n
9fXp9O0x81s7pXU9in7j4nlc%3Dreserved=0 (Published 21 October 2020) Cite this as:
BMJ
WHEREAS on 02 December 2022 Pfizer Inc. and BioNTech announced “that the
Medicines Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) in the U.K. has granted a
temporary authorization for emergency use for their COVID-19 mRNA vaccine
(BNT162b2), against COVID-19. This constitutes the first Emergency Use Authorization
following a worldwide Phase 3 trial of a vaccine to help fight the pandemic.”
[The Pfizer press release states the Relative Risk Reduction RRR ONLY that is alleged as
the “vaccine efficacy rate”, but does not state the below 1% Absolute Risk Reduction
ARR.]
…” In July 2020, Pfizer and BioNTech announced an agreement with the U.K. to supply
30 million doses of the BNT162b2 mRNA-based vaccine, once authorized for emergency
use. That agreement was increased to 40 million doses in early October [2020]. The
delivery of the 40 million doses will occur throughout 2020 and 2021, in stages, to ensure
an equitable allocation of vaccines across the geographies with executed contracts. Now
that the vaccine is authorized in the U.K., the companies will take immediate action to
begin the delivery of vaccine doses. The first doses are expected to arrive in the U.K. in
the coming days, with complete delivery fulfilment expected in 2021.”
https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pfizer.com%2F
news%2Fpress-release%2Fpress-release-detail%2Fpfizer-and-biontech-achieve-first-
authorization-
worlddata=05%7C01%7Cdhmail%40dhsc.gov.uk%7C88381672a884454eec0f08db4d6ed
bea%7C61278c3091a84c318c1fef4de8973a1c%7C1%7C0%7C638188910746906489%7
CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1ha
WwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7Csdata=hEwn%2BYhhdtfa03SYMx2BJMM
WR3%2BdslEtXQ5B9%2BjL9s4%3Dreserved=0
WHEREAS “Let’s put this in perspective”. First, a relative risk reduction is being reported,
not absolute risk reduction, which appears to be less than 1%. Second, these results refer
to the trials’ primary endpoint of covid-19 of essentially any severity, and importantly not
the vaccine’s ability to save lives, nor the ability to prevent infection, nor the efficacy in
important subgroups (e.g. frail elderly). Those still remain unknown. Third, these results
reflect a time point relatively soon after vaccination, and we know nothing about vaccine
performance at 3, 6, or 12 months, so cannot compare these efficacy numbers against
other vaccines like influenza vaccines (which are judged over a season). Fourth, children,
adolescents, and immunocompromised individuals were largely excluded from the trials,
so we still lack any data on these important populations.”
https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fblogs.bmj.com%2Fb
mj%2F2020%2F11%2F26%2Fpeter-doshi-pfizer-and-modernas-95-effective-vaccines-
lets-be-cautious-and-first-see-the-full-
data%2Fdata=05%7C01%7Cdhmail%40dhsc.gov.uk%7C88381672a884454eec0f08db4d
6edbea%7C61278c3091a84c318c1fef4de8973a1c%7C1%7C0%7C638188910746906489
%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik
1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7Csdata=aR6s%2BRkE6BDHKTt8Rmm
WVdVBNy%2FKiWXKOwxlqJYAJy0%3Dreserved=0
WHEREAS according to the official UK Government’s available MHRA COVID-19
VACCINE-ADVERSE-REACTIONS--REPORTS* data as of the 25 November 2021 show:
1,814 TOTAL-FATALITIES / DEATHS reported from COVID-19 VACCINES
1,298,807 TOTAL ADVERSE EVENTS / REACTIONS reported from COVID-19
VACCINES
395,049 TOTAL REPORTS of ADVERSE-EVENTS reported from COVID-19
VACCINES
*COVID-19-VACCINES manufactured by AstraZeneca, Moderna and Pfizer
https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoronavirus-
yellowcard.mhra.gov.uk%2Fdata=05%7C01%7Cdhmail%40dhsc.gov.uk%7C88381672a8
84454eec0f08db4d6edbea%7C61278c3091a84c318c1fef4de8973a1c%7C1%7C0%7C63
8188910746906489%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoi
V2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7Csdata=8KtT5ire08
8FI5mRABHnJD21IImxNls9aHz%2F2hDzWt4%3Dreserved=0 and
https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fyellowcard.ukcolum
n.org%2Fyellow-card-
reportsdata=05%7C01%7Cdhmail%40dhsc.gov.uk%7C88381672a884454eec0f08db4d6e
dbea%7C61278c3091a84c318c1fef4de8973a1c%7C1%7C0%7C638188910746906489%
7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1h
aWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7Csdata=Tw45XgDGOmjeUAYWG6QTUn
%2BRGG51SmmuvzLz66rrQeo%3Dreserved=0
WHEREAS according to the official UK Government’s latest available MHRA COVID-19
VACCINE-ADVERSE-REACTIONS--REPORTS* Report run date: 29 September 2022
Data lock date: 28/09/2022 show:
2,272 TOTAL-FATALITIES / DEATHS reported from COVID-19 VACCINES
1,517,612 TOTAL ADVERSE EVENTS / REACTIONS reported from COVID-19
VACCINES
464,058 TOTAL REPORTS of ADVERSE-EVENTS reported from COVID-19
VACCINES
*COVID-19-VACCINES manufactured by AstraZeneca, Moderna and Pfizer
https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoronavirus-
yellowcard.mhra.gov.uk%2Fdata=05%7C01%7Cdhmail%40dhsc.gov.uk%7C88381672a8
84454eec0f08db4d6edbea%7C61278c3091a84c318c1fef4de8973a1c%7C1%7C0%7C63
8188910746906489%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoi
V2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7Csdata=8KtT5ire08
8FI5mRABHnJD21IImxNls9aHz%2F2hDzWt4%3Dreserved=0 and
https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fyellowcard.ukcolum
n.org%2Fyellow-card-
reportsdata=05%7C01%7Cdhmail%40dhsc.gov.uk%7C88381672a884454eec0f08db4d6e
dbea%7C61278c3091a84c318c1fef4de8973a1c%7C1%7C0%7C638188910746906489%
7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1h
aWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7Csdata=Tw45XgDGOmjeUAYWG6QTUn
%2BRGG51SmmuvzLz66rrQeo%3Dreserved=0
WHEREAS vaccines are UNAVOIDABLY-UNSAFE-PRODUCTS - the Supreme Court of
the United States decided that vaccine manufacturers would be exempt from strict liability
as vaccines are unavoidably unsafe products” in Bruesewitz versus Wyeth 2010
https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.supremecourt.
gov%2Fopinions%2F10pdf%2F09-
152.pdfdata=05%7C01%7Cdhmail%40dhsc.gov.uk%7C88381672a884454eec0f08db4d6e
dbea%7C61278c3091a84c318c1fef4de8973a1c%7C1%7C0%7C638188910746906489%
7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1h
aWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7Csdata=kTaQbvduF7NRWs8pXOH8yA6u
68ZwjBmaiNfFQNg951k%3Dreserved=0
WHEREAS according to a Freedom of Information response, the MHRA receives funding
from including, but not limited to the PHARMACEUTICAL-INDUSTRY.
WHEREAS according to a Freedom of Information response, the MHRA currently
receives approximately $3 MILLION-DOLLARS of grant funding from the BILL-AND-
MELINDA-GATES-FOUNDATION.
https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.gov.uk%2Fgov
ernment%2Fpublications%2Ffreedom-of-information-responses-from-the-mhra-week-
commencing-21-june-2021%2Ffreedom-of-information-request-on-whether-the-mhra-
receives-funding-from-the-bill-and-melinda-gates-foundation-foi-21-
624data=05%7C01%7Cdhmail%40dhsc.gov.uk%7C88381672a884454eec0f08db4d6edbe
a%7C61278c3091a84c318c1fef4de8973a1c%7C1%7C0%7C638188910746906489%7C
Unknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haW
wiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7Csdata=6SI1TA5Atlgm1dsjbNXPtBX%2Fuvp
F9AQT1h%2BhNInQI1c%3Dreserved=0
In accordance to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 you are required to provide the
following:
.1 As none of the Phase III clinical trials for COVID-19 “vaccines” / gene therapies /jabs
including Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZenica Oxford ChAdOx1 that were deployed were
designed to detect a reduction in any serious outcome such as hospital admissions, use of
intensive care, severe disease or deaths and as further confirmed by a Pfizer Executive
testifying in the European Parliament, these COVID-19 vaccines were not tested on
prevention of infection and stopping person to person’ transmission of the alleged SARS-
Cov2 virus and as only Relative Risk Reduction was reported on the COVID-19 and not
the Absolute Risk Reduction which introduced reporting bias as for the three COVID-19
vaccines mentioned above their Absolute Risk Reduction was below 2%, provide all
documents, peer reviewed papers and studies, that enabled maria: caulfield: living woman
doing business as (dba) MARIA CAULFIELD Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for
Health and Social Care acting in her capacity as ‘Maria Caulfield’ to claim on in Parliament
on 13th December 2022 “all the vaccines used in the UK are safe and
effective…..extensive data shows that the vaccine is safe and highly effective in reducing
deaths”
.2. The definition(s) along with the time used for each definition for the word “effective”
that were used / deployed by maria: caulfield: living woman doing business as MARIA
CAULFIELD acting as Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Health and Social Care
and/or public servants and/or agents for the DEPARTMENT-OF-HEALTH regarding
COVID-19 vaccines and / or the COVID-19 “vaccine” deployment including, but not limited
to advertising campaigns from 01 March 2020 – 31 December 2022.
3. As safe is defined by Black’s Law Dictionary as quote “the amount of exposure that will
cause no harm or no damage after exposure” end quote*, provide the definition(s) along
with the time used for each definition for the word “safe” that were used / deployed by
maria: caulfield: living woman doing business as MARIA CAULFIELD acting as
Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Health and Social Care and/or public servants
and/or agents for the DEPARTMENT-OF-HEALTH regarding COVID-19 vaccines and / or
the COVID-19 “vaccine” deployment including, but not limited to advertising campaigns
from 01 March 2020 – 31 December 2022.
*https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fthelawdictionary.or
g%2Fsafe%2Fdata=05%7C01%7Cdhmail%40dhsc.gov.uk%7C88381672a884454eec0f08
db4d6edbea%7C61278c3091a84c318c1fef4de8973a1c%7C1%7C0%7C63818891074690
6489%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBT
iI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7Csdata=U1bNDxIuGbaVV7OVlHfD
Z6sz2YLxEiVufI%2FJzx7em%2Fk%3Dreserved=0
Please also note that my request is not limited to records that were authored by public
servants including, but not limited to maria: caulfield: living woman doing business as
MARIA CAULFIELD acting as Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Health and
Social Care and/or agents of the DEPARTMENT-OF-HEALTH or that pertain to work done
by public servants and/or agents of the DEPARTMENT-OF-HEALTH.
My request includes any sort of record, for example (but not limited to) any published
peer-reviewed study that public servants including, but not limited to maria: caulfield: living
woman doing business as MARIA CAULFIELD acting as Parliamentary Under Secretary of
State for Health and Social Care and/or agents of the DEPARTMENT-OF-HEALTH has
downloaded or printed.
Please provide enough information about each record, so that I may identify and access
each record with certainty (i.e. title, author(s), date, journal, where the public may access
it).”
This will be used as evidence. The information claimed/requested in accordance to the
Freedom of Information Act 2000 is of public interest.
Please number your responses 1-2. I require that each item / claim / request to have its
own specific individual response.
I do not consent to receiving incomplete, unnecessary, incorrect, misleading or untruthful
information or representations within Freedom of Information responses.
I do not consent to the names and job titles of public servants including but not limited to
employees, assistant directors, deputy chief medical officers and agents of the Department
of Health, the NHS, the Northern Ireland Executive, MLA s, politicians and or regulatory
bodies and or being redacted.
The DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH exists for one purpose only - to give services to the
public and has no other purpose. This is not a gift or altruistic service - it is a public service
and is allegedly paid by the people through public money.
I have the reasonable expectation that you, maria: caulfield: a living woman and acting as
a public servant in the role of Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Health and Social
Care will honour and adhere to your position of trust, the Seven Principles of Public Life,
your duty of care, Ministerial Code of Conduct, common law obligations, statutory
obligations and protocols that govern public servants.
The 7 principles of public life are: Honesty; Openness; Leadership; Integrity;
Accountability; Objectivity and Selflessness.
https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.gov.uk%2Fgov
ernment%2Fpublications%2Fthe-7-principles-of-public-
lifedata=05%7C01%7Cdhmail%40dhsc.gov.uk%7C88381672a884454eec0f08db4d6edbe
a%7C61278c3091a84c318c1fef4de8973a1c%7C1%7C0%7C638188910746906489%7C
Unknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haW
wiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7Csdata=lFZ80BNjPAdASoaFKWoSa0a%2Ft
w2iTpGeIIZbthN69zY%3Dreserved=0
Govern yourself accordingly.
Sincerely and without ill will, without vexation and without frivolity With honour and truth
mary anne:
By: mary anne: mccloskey:
All rights Reserved:
All Freedoms Reserved:
Acting in the capacity of Dr Anne McCloskey:
Settler, Executor and Beneficiary for any and all derivatives of / for MARY ANNE
MCCLOSKEY:
Without recourse Non-Assumpsit:
cc: To All Whom It May Concern
Yours faithfully,
Dr. Anne Mc Closkey
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx
