Evidence supporting David Gauke's assertion at the Conservative Party Conference
Dear Department for Work and Pensions,
David Gauke said during a fringe event at this year's Conservative party conference in Manchester, that 'he was very conscious of the point that there are people, particularly with mental health conditions such as anxiety and depression, whereby you can have a vicious circle, where the stress of sanctions doesn’t result in more compliant behaviour, but… less compliant behaviour'. https://www.disabilitynewsservice.com/to...
As there is no publicly available detailed information on the level of compliance of people with mental health conditions like depression or anxiety, I would like to know on which evidence this assertion is based.
More specifically, I will like to have
1) any statistics on the number of claimants with depression and anxiety as primary conditions, and
2) any statistics related to sanctions and repeated sanctions for this category of claimants,
3) any internal studies or analysis undertaken by DWP on the impact of sanctions on people with mental conditions, referring specifically to depression and anxiety, which support David Gauke's assertion.
If the cost of this request exceeds the cost limit, please only respond to Question No3
Yours faithfully,
Anita Bellows
This is an automated confirmation that your request for information has
been accepted by the DWP FoI mailbox.
By the next working day your request will be forwarded to the relevant
information owner within the Department who will respond to you direct.
If your email is a Freedom of Information request you can normally
expect a response within 20 working days.
Should you have any further queries in connection with this request do
please contact us.
For further information on the Freedom of Information Act within DWP
please click on the link below.
[1]http://www.dwp.gov.uk/freedom-of-informa...
References
Visible links
1. http://www.dwp.gov.uk/freedom-of-informa...
Thank you for your Freedom of Information request.
You can expect a reply by 2 November 2017 unless I need to come back to you to clarify your request or the balance of the public interest test needs to be considered.
If you have any queries about this letter please contact me quoting the reference number above.
Yours sincerely
DWP Strategy FoI Team
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your right to complain under the Freedom of Information Act
If you are not happy with this response you may request an internal review by e-mailing [DWP request email] or by writing to DWP, Central FoI Team,
Caxton House, Tothill Street, SW1H 9NA. Any review request should be submitted within two months of the date of this letter. Please remember to quote the reference number above in any future communications.
If you are not content with the outcome of the internal review you may apply directly to the Information Commissioner’s Office for a decision. Generally the Commissioner cannot make a decision unless you have exhausted our own complaints procedure. The Information Commissioner can be contacted at: The Information Commissioner’s Office, Wycliffe House, Water Lane, Wilmslow Cheshire SK9 5AF
www.ico.org.uk/Global/contact_us or telephone 0303 123 1113 or 01625 545745
Please see the attached reply to your Freedom of Information request
Yours sincerely
DWP Strategy Freedom of Information Team
Dear Ms Bellows,
Please accept our apologies for the missing attachment on the previous email.
Please now see the attached reply to your Freedom of Information request
Yours sincerely
DWP Strategy Freedom of Information Team
We work to defend the right to FOI for everyone
Help us protect your right to hold public authorities to account. Donate and support our work.
Donate Now
J Roberts left an annotation ()
Here is some information from Dr David Webster's latest report which some people might be interested in:
"Table 1 therefore shows the mean quarterly(not monthly) rate of sanctions after challenges for the period July 2011 to March 2017 , for each of the 20 condition groups, ranking them in order from highest to lowest.
The variations between groups are very large. Of the big groups, ‘mental and behavioural’ has the highest rate of sanction, followed by ‘respiratory’, ‘injury and poisoning’, a general ‘other’ group, ‘nervous system’, ‘musculoskeletal’ and ‘circulatory."
https://suwn.files.wordpress.com/2017/09...