Evidence given to House of Lords committees by seven opaque and deceptive policy groups

The request was successful.

Dear Sir/Madam,

Please provide me with the following information:

(1) Please indicate the number of times individuals representing the following organisations gave evidence to House of Lords committees during the calendar year 2016, broken down by individual organisation and by committee, indicating in each case whether the evidence given was written and/or verbal, and providing in each case a hyperlink to the evidence that was submitted:
a) Policy Network
b) Policy Exchange
c) Institute of Economic Affairs
d) Civitas
e) Centre for Policy Studies
f) Adam Smith Institute
g) International Institute for Strategic Studies

(2) Please supply a list of disclosure forms (and/or functional equivalents) that individuals and/or groups submitting written and/or verbal evidence to House of Lords committees must complete, and provide a link to these form(s) and/or functional equivalent(s).

Some background information relevant to this FOI request can be found here:

New House Rules Go After Think Tank Funding
http://www.thinktankwatch.com/2015/01/ne...

Transparify report on UK Think Tanks 2017: Transparency, Lobbying and Fake News
http://bit.ly/2kpfE9x

Thank you for your time, best wishes,

Till Bruckner

HL FOI & Information Compliance, House of Lords

Dear Till,

 

I am writing in response to your request (copied below) to the House of
Lords.

 

(1)    The information we hold relevant to your request is published and
available at data.parliament.uk.  We have provided the relevant links
below.  For future reference you may wish to be aware that you can seek
assistance with searching this site through the contact us service.

 

Energy & Environment Sub-Committee

Written x 1:
[1]http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidenc...

 

Economic Affairs Committee

Oral x 2:
[2]http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidenc...
and
[3]http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidenc...

Written x 2:
[4]http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidenc...
and
[5]http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidenc...

 

International Relations Committee

Oral x 1:
[6]http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidenc...

 

Licensing Act 2003 Committee

Oral x 1:
[7]http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidenc...

 

JCHR

Oral x 1:
[8]http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidenc...

Written x 1:
[9]http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidenc...

 

(2)    We do not have disclosure forms or any functional equivalents.

 

You may, if dissatisfied with the treatment of your request, ask the House
of Lords to conduct an internal review. This should be addressed to
[10][email address] or to the Freedom of Information Officer, House
of Lords, London SW1A 0PW and explain clearly the nature of your
complaint. Arrangements will be made for someone who has not been involved
in dealing with your request to conduct an internal review within 20
working days. You should note that we will not normally accept an
application for internal review if it is received more than two months
after the date our response was sent. Any such request received after this
time will only be considered in exceptional circumstances.

 

If, following this review, you remain dissatisfied with the House’s
treatment of your request for information you may then take your complaint
to the Information Commissioner at Wycliffe House, Water Lane, Wilmslow,
Cheshire, SK9 5AF.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

 

Frances Grey

Freedom of Information Officer

House of Lords

 

 

show quoted sections

Dear HL FOI & Information Compliance,

thank you very much. I wish US authorities were as prompt and diligent in replying to FOI requests.

Yours sincerely,

Till Bruckner

Looking for an EU Authority?

You can request documents directly from EU Institutions at our sister site AskTheEU.org . Find out more .

AskTheEU.org