This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'Drumtara / Ballymena disgrace'.



 
Mr. Bruno   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
By email 
(xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx)                                
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
24 August 2020 
 
Dear Mr. Bruno, 
 
I refer to your email dated 13 August 2020 in which you requested the following 
information: 
 
What improvement schemes and their costs were carried out in Drumtara, 
Ballymena in each year from 2000 onwards?
 
      
I am writing to confirm that the Housing Executive has processed your request as a 
request for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and is providing the 
following information: 
 
Previous schemes carried out at Drumtara, Ballymena 
Scheme Type 
Project No. 
Addresses 
Date of 
 
Possession 
Heating 07.66.1007 
91 
addresses 
2019 
Heating 07.66.0028 
39 
addresses 
2012 
ECM 07.78.0058 
All 
2011 
ECM 07.78.0046 
All 
2001 
Double Glazing 
Records are indicating  All 2002 
that double glazing 
was installed in 2002 - 
May have been done 
in External Cyclical 
Maintenance (ECM) 
scheme 07.78.0046 

 
In respect of your request regarding the costs, the Housing Executive’s view is that the 
costs in this report are commercially sensitive. I have sought advice from our GDPR Team 
in relation to your FOI request regarding the disclosure of the costs in respect of the above 
mentioned schemes that were carried out in Drumtara, Ballymena in each year from 2000 
onwards. 
 
We have concluded that the exemption in Section 43(2) of the Freedom of Information Act 
2000 applies to that information, because its disclosure under the Act would be likely to 
prejudice the commercial interests of the Housing Executive and relevant contractors, and 
therefore have applied redactions to this information. 
 
 
 
 


 
43 Commercial interests 
(1)  Information is exempt information if it constitutes a trade secret. 
(2)  Information is exempt information if its disclosure under this Act would, or would be 

likely to, prejudice the commercial interests of any person (including the public 
authority holding it). 

(3)  Section 43(2) is a ‘qualified’ exemption and I must now go on to consider if the public 
interest is in favour of maintaining the exemption or vice versa.  On weighing the 
factors for and against disclosure, I have concluded that the public interest lies in not 
disclosing the information.  I have set out below the factors which I have taken into 
account in reaching my conclusion. 
 
Factors in favour of disclosure 
 
There is a rebuttable presumption in favour of disclosure.  I accept that there is a general 
public interest in transparency and accountability, and in understanding the reason why 
certain decisions were made and how public money is spent. 
 
Factors in maintaining exemption 
 
There is a strong public interest in public bodies being able to contract services effectively, 
so anything which prevents that (such as companies being fearful that commercially 
sensitive information such as pricing of services will be disclosed to their competitors) will 
not be in the public interest. 
 
If you feel that this response does not adequately meet your response, please contact our 
Asset Management FOI Co-ordinator, Girlie Nuguid on (028) 9598 5003 or by email 
xxxxxx.xxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx.xx in the first instance. 
 
You have the right to request a formal review by the Housing Executive within two 
calendar months of the date of this letter. If you wish to do this, please contact us by email 
at xxx@xxxx.xxx.xx. 
 
Following an internal review, if you find that you are still dissatisfied with the response, you 
have the right to appeal to the Information Commissioner at The Information 
Commissioner’s Office, Wycliffe House, Water Lane, Wilmslow, Cheshire SK9 5AF  
 
Thank you. 
 
Yours sincerely, 
 
 
 
Leeann Vincent 
Assistant Director, Project Delivery 
Asset Management