Does the specific statutory public office “THE DIRECTOR OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTION SERVICE FOR NORTHERN IRELAND”, expressly and specifically created by statutory legislation, exist?

Response to this request is long overdue. By law, under all circumstances, Department of Justice (Northern Ireland) should have responded by now (details). You can complain by requesting an internal review.

Dr. Anne Mc Closkey

……………………….NOTICE-FOR-FREEDOM-OF-INFORMATION-ACT-2000
………………………………..FOR-THE-PUBLIC-RECORD
.….………………....…………..……………......……………………mary anne: mccloskey:
………...……..……...………...……….........acting in her capacity as ‘Dr Anne McCloskey’
.…........................................... ………….…............……………………….18 February 2024

Notice to the principal is notice to the agent, Notice to the agent is notice to the principal

naomi rachel: long: a living woman
doing business as (dba) NAOMI RACHEL LONG
acting as MINISTER-OF-JUSTICE
for EXECUTIVE-COMMITTEE-OF-THE-ASSEMBY
DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE
Block B, Castle Buildings,
Stormont Estate, Belfast

richard: pengelly: a living man
doing business as (dba) RICHARD PENGELLY
acting as Permanent-Secretary
DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE
Block B, Castle Buildings,
Stormont Estate, Belfast

Hereinafter: “you”, “your” and “yourself”

Does the specific statutory public office “THE DIRECTOR OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTION SERVICE FOR NORTHERN IRELAND”, expressly and specifically created by statutory legislation, exist?

Greetings naomi rachel: long: and richard: pengelly:

WHEREAS the Justice Act (Northern Ireland) 2002 as amended creates the specific statutory public office of the ‘DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS FOR NORTHERN IRELAND’ as a CORPORATION-SOLE under Section 30A, and as such this corporation-sole for a specific statutory public office has a separate and specific legal identity that is distinct from the ‘PUBLIC PROSECUTION SERVICE FOR NORTHERN IRELAND’ as a CORPORATION-AGGREGATE.

Justice (Northern Ireland) Act 2002 as amended https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/200... :
“30A Corporation sole etc
(1) The Director of Public Prosecutions for Northern Ireland is a corporation sole.”

WHEREAS the Justice Act (Northern Ireland) 2002 as amended created the ‘PUBLIC PROSECUTION SERVICE FOR NORTHERN IRELAND’ as a statutory CORPORATION-AGGREGATE under Section 29, and as such this statutory corporation-aggregate has a separate and specific legal identity that is distinct from the ‘DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS FOR NORTHERN IRELAND’ as a CORPORATION-SOLE.

Justice (Northern Ireland) Act 2002 as amended https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/200... :
“29 Public Prosecution Service
(1) There is to be a prosecuting service for Northern Ireland known as the Public Prosecution Service for Northern Ireland.”

WHEREAS the HM-GOVERNMENT defines CORPORATION-SOLE and CORPORATION-AGGREGATE as:

Part 1 Corporations June 2011 from a ‘Freedom of Information Technical Manual’

‘75.2 Types of Corporation
There are two [2] types of corporation,

[1] a CORPORATION-SOLE and
[2] a CORPORATION-AGGREGATE

75.3 CORPORATION-SOLE

A CORPORATION-SOLE is an individual person who represents an official position which has a SINGLE-SEPARATE-LEGAL-ENTITY [i.e. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS FOR NORTHERN IRELAND, SECRETARY OF STATE, etc]. The death of the individual will not affect the corporation as there is a right of succession. The Crown, bishops, deans, vicars and the Lord Mayor of London are examples of a CORPORATION-SOLE. A CORPORATION-SOLE can ONLY-BE-CREATED-BY-STATUTE [i.e. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS FOR NORTHERN IRELAND via Justice (Northern Ireland) Act 2002 Section 30A].

75.4 CORPORATION-AGGREGATE

A CORPORATION-AGGREGATE is a separate legal entity [i.e. PUBLIC PROSECUTION SERVICE] formed by several individual persons. The CORPORATION-AGGREGATE has an existence which is separate from the persons comprising it. There are three types of CORPORATION-AGGREGATE: chartered, statutory and registered.

75.6 Statutory CORPORATION-AGGREGATE

A statutory CORPORATION-AGGREGATE may only be created by Parliament using a specific piece of legislation for that purpose [i.e. PUBLIC PROSECUTION SERVICE via Justice (Northern Ireland) Act 2002 section 29]. For example, the Iron and Steel Act 1967 which created British Steel.’

For the HM-GOVERNMENT DEFINITIONS: https://www.insolvencydirect.bis.gov.uk/...

WHEREAS “The Cabinet Manual: A guide to laws, conventions and rules on the operation of government” was published by the CABINET-OFFICE in 2011 and states:

‘3.27 It is also the well-established practice for each SECRETARY-OF-STATE to be allocated RESPONSIBILTY by the Prime Minister for a particular DEPARTMENT (for example health, foreign affairs, defence, transport, education etc.) and, accordingly, for each SECRETARY-OF-STATE, in practice, to exercise only those functions that are within that department. It is for the Prime Minister [First Lord of the Treasury] to determine the various departments (see paragraphs 3.55–3.59 on machinery of government changes).

3.28 Most SECRETARIES-OF-STATE are INCORORATED as ‘CORPORATIONS-SOLE’. This gives the MINISTER a SEPARATE-LEGAL-PERSONALITY. This is administratively convenient, for example as regards the ownership of property, because it facilitates continuity when the officeholder changes.’

The Cabinet Manual https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk...

THEREFORE in accordance to the Freedom of Information Act:

1. As the Justice Act (Northern Ireland) 2002 as amended created the specific statutory public office of the ‘DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS FOR NORTHERN IRELAND’ as a corporation-sole under Section 30A and also created the ‘PUBLIC PROSECUTION SERVICE FOR NORTHERN IRELAND’ as a statutory corporation-aggregate under Section 29, THEREFORE you are required to ‘confirm or deny’* if there is another specific statutory public office of “THE DIRECTOR OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTION SERVICE FOR NORTHERN IRELAND” (take notice of the specific wording) that exists and was expressly and specifically created by statutory legislation.

-Please respond by selecting either YES 1A. or NO 1B. as specified below:

1A. YES, “THE DIRECTOR OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTION SERVICE FOR NORTHERN IRELAND” exists as a specific statutory public office and was expressly and specifically, created by statutory legislation. Please go next to 1A(i) and 1A(ii).

OR

1B. NO, “THE DIRECTOR OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTION SERVICE FOR NORTHERN IRELAND” as a specific statutory public office does not exist.

1A(i). If YES, and the specific public statutory office “THE DIRECTOR OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTION SERVICE FOR NORTHERN IRELAND” does exist, please provide the specific statutory legislation that expressly and specifically created the statutory public office “THE DIRECTOR OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTION SERVICE FOR NORTHERN IRELAND”, along with the year it was created, the specific section, article and or sub section and the working link to www.legislation.gov.uk for the specific statutory legislation, in order to verify that specific legislation.

1A(ii). If YES, and the specific public statutory office “THE DIRECTOR OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTION SERVICE FOR NORTHERN IRELAND” does exist, please also provide the full name of the current public statutory office holder for “THE DIRECTOR OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTION SERVICE FOR NORTHERN IRELAND” and the date that he or she was appointed.

*As a public servant you are aware, that it is your duty “to confirm or deny” in accordance to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 Part I ‘Right to Information’ Section I.

I require each item to have its own specific response that is clearly numbered 1A., 1A(i) and 1A(ii) or 1B.

I do not consent to receiving false information / statements, deceitful at common law information / statements, incorrect information / statements, misleading information / statements, dishonest information / statements, misrepresentations and or false representations in any Freedom of Information Act 2000 responses / claims.

As you are aware, a public servant holds a public office and operates in the public in order to serve and protect the public, and is NOT a private servant, thus a public servant’s full name and job title must NOT be redacted in order that there can be accountability for all acts and or omissions.

“Accountability: Holders of public office are accountable to the public for their decisions and actions and must submit themselves to the scrutiny necessary to ensure this.”
https://www.gov.uk/government/publicatio...

The information requested / claimed is of public interest as there must be openness, transparency, accountability and honesty regarding the MINSTER-OF-JUSTICE, DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS FOR NORTHERN IRELAND, the judiciary, constables, civil servants, members of the Northern Ireland Civil Service, public servants, etcetera.

The public statutory office MINISTER-OF-JUSTICE and the DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE exists for 1, one, purpose only - to serve the people and has no other purpose. This is not a gift or an altruistic service - it is a public service.

I have the reasonable expectation that you, naomi rachel: long: a living woman, doing business as (dba) NAOMI RACHEL LONG acting as a public servant in the public office MINISTER-OF-JUSTICE for the EXECUTIVE-COMMITTEE-OF-THE-ASSEMBY, will honour and adhere to, your position of trust, the Seven Principles of Public Life, ministerial code, your duty of care, duty of candour, common law obligations, statutory obligations and protocols that govern public servants.

I have the reasonable expectation that you, richard: pengelly: a living man, doing business as (dba) RICHARD PENGELLY acting as a public servant in the public office Permanent Secretary for the DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE, will honour and adhere to, your position of trust, the Seven Principles of Public Life, your duty of care, duty of candour, common law obligations, statutory obligations and protocols that govern public servants.

The, 7, seven principles of public life are: Honesty; Accountability; Openness; Leadership; Integrity; Objectivity and Selflessness. https://www.gov.uk/government/publicatio...

This notice will be used as material evidence.

This notice is sent without ill will, without vexation, and without frivolity.

You are also hereby noticed that it is not my intention to harass, to intimidate, to threaten, to abuse, to offend, to conspire, to blackmail, to coerce, to cause harm, anxiety, alarm or distress, as the information presented here is done so with peaceful and honourable intentions and is part of due process.

You have been noticed. I have the reasonable expectation that you will govern yourself accordingly.

…………………………….…………………With honour and in pure truth,

………………………..………….………………….…….………By: mary anne: mccloskey:
………...………………………………..……………….………………….All rights reserved:
……….……………………..……………...………….………………All Freedoms Reserved:
….…………………………..…………...........Acting in the capacity of Dr Anne McCloskey:
….....…….………..….Settlor, Executor and Beneficiary for any and all derivatives of / for
….…………….……………………………......……………………MARY ANNE MCCLOSKEY:
………………..……..…………….………………………Without recourse Non-Assumpsit:
…………………….………………..………………………………………………………I.N.J.

C.c. To all whom it may concern.

Notice to the principal is notice to the agent, Notice to the agent is notice to the principal

The rest of this page is left intentionally blank.

DOJ FOI Mailbox, Department of Justice (Northern Ireland)

1 Attachment

Good afternoon,

With reference to your FOI request, please see attached response.

Regards,

DOJ Records & Information Team

show quoted sections

Dr. Anne Mc Closkey

………………………NOTICE-FOR-DEFAULT-OPPORTUNITY-TO-CURE

…………………NOTICE-FOR-REJECTION-IN-ITS-ENTIRETY-REGARDING-
……………THE-ALLEGED-FREEDOM-OF-INFORMATION-ACT-2000-REPSONSE
………………………………………..DATED-13-MARCH-2024

……………………………………..NOTICE-FOR-CLARIFICATION

……………………….NOTICE-FOR-FREEDOM-OF-INFORMATION-ACT-2000
………………………………….REQUEST-DATED-18-FEBRUARY-2024
……………………………………FOR-THE-PUBLIC-RECORD

…….………………….……………..………………………………………………mary anne:
……………...……..………………...………acting in the capacity as ‘Dr Anne McCloskey’
…………………………………………………………….Hereinafter: “I”, “me” “my”, “myself”

………..…............................................... ………….………………………….19 March 2024

Notice to the principal is notice to the agent, Notice to the agent is notice to the principal

naomi rachel: long: a living woman
doing business as (dba) NAOMI RACHEL LONG
acting as MINISTER-OF-JUSTICE
for EXECUTIVE-COMMITTEE-OF-THE-ASSEMBY
DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE
Block B, Castle Buildings,
Stormont Estate, Belfast

richard: pengelly: a living man
doing business as (dba) RICHARD PENGELLY
acting as Permanent-Secretary and
Principal-Accounting-Officer
for DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE
Block B, Castle Buildings,
Stormont Estate, Belfast

Hereinafter: “you”, “your” and “yourself”, “Respondents”

Does the specific statutory public office “THE DIRECTOR OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTION SERVICE FOR NORTHERN IRELAND”, expressly and specifically created by statutory legislation, exist?

Greetings naomi rachel: long: and richard: pengelly:

I, mary anne: acting in the capacity as Dr Anne McCloskey, claimant, private civilian, sui juris, a living woman of peace, hereby claiming all rights nunc pro tunc:

I, as the claimant, hereby give notice that on the 13 March 2024, I was disturbed by a strange message received via whatdotheyknow.com from an UN-NAMED civil servant /public servant / public office holder for the DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE, Records-&-Information-Team, and you will both be aware that an ‘anonymous’ Freedom of Information Act 2000 response by unnamed civil servant is a direct breach of the ‘NORTHERN-IRELAND-CIVIL-SERVICE-CODE-OF-ETHICS’ paragraph 3 and as such must be a direct breach of the Seven-Principles-of-Public-Life including, but not limited to 1.4 Accountability as all civil servants “are accountable to the public for their decisions and actions and MUST submit themselves to the scrutiny necessary to ensure this.” But not limited to these.

As all civil servants within the DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE are accountable to naomi rachel: long: acting as the MINISTER-OF-JUSTICE, I have the reasonable expectation that all further responses to my Freedom of Information Act 2000 request / claim 18 February 2024 must be by named civil servants of the DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE to ensure accountability, fairness, transparency, openness, honesty, etcetera.

It is obvious that the un-named civil servant has completely misunderstood my FOIA request / claim 18 February 2024, as other civil servants / public servants from 3 other Government organisations who were sent the same Freedom of Information Act 2000 request / claim were able to supply a sufficient response by a named civil servant / public servant. So why is the DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE different?

The strange message on 13 March 2024 allegedly from an un-named civil servant for the DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE stated:

“…The Department has determined that your request is seeking legal advice as opposed to actual recorded information and therefore does not fall within the Department’s obligations under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. I regret to advise that the Department cannot assist further with your request. As a suggestion, you may wish to consider seeking advice from a qualified legal professional in relation to the information you require.”

I, as the claimant, reject and rebut - in its entirety – this message dated the 13 May 2024 including, but not limited to the allegation that I was “seeking legal advice” as the 13 May 2024 message is incurably bad, a fatally defective attempt to obstruct and block disclosure of information and records held or not held (confirm or deny) by the DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE, is verifiably untrue, a false representation and a misrepresentation of my FOIA request / claim by an un-named civil servant for the DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE.

I do not consent to this incurably bad, fatally defective, null and void message that was sent on 13 March 2024 by an un-named civil servant for the DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE regarding my Freedom of Information Act 2000 request / claim 18 February 2024.

Respectfully, I remind you that all civil servants, employees and agents for DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE of your duties and obligations under section 77 ‘Offence of altering etc. records with intent to prevent disclosure’ for the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and section 75 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998.

I, as the claimant, consider the message on the 13 March 2024 as obstruction. I consider this as an attempt to block and prevent the disclosure of the information and records to which I am entitled to regarding my request / claim in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act 2000 dated 18 February 2024.

Section 77 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 clearly states:

“(1)Where— (a) a request for information has been made to a public authority, and (b) under section 1 of this Act ... the applicant would have been entitled (subject to payment of any fee) to communication of any information in accordance with that section, any person to whom this subsection applies is guilty of an offence if he alters, defaces, blocks, erases, destroys or conceals any record held by the public authority, with the intention of preventing the disclosure by that authority of all, or any part, of the information to the communication of which the applicant would have been entitled.

(2) Subsection (1) applies to the public authority and to any person who is employed by, is an officer of, or is subject to the direction of, the public authority.”

To clarify, I, the claimant on the 18 February 2024 made a request / claim in accordance to the Freedom of Information Act 2000. This FOIA request / claim 18 February 2024 is not limited to information and records that were authored by public servants, civil servants and/or agents for the DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE.

My Freedom of Information Act 2000 request / claim lawfully made on 18 February 2024 was reasonable and was NOT “seeking legal advice”, but instead includes any sort of information and or record, including, but not limited to, any published legislation and or statute that public servants, civil servants and/or agents for the DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE have downloaded or printed or electronic information, records, computer files and or templates kept on the FUJITSU developed and – Integrated-Computer-Operating-System ‘ICOS’ and the FUJITSU developed CAUSEWAY computer systems, but not limited to these systems.

My FOIA request / claim is reasonable and in the public interest, as the MINISTER-OF-JUSTICE supported by public servants, civil servants and/or agents for the DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE have overall responsibility for legislation and policy framework regarding the justice system, the courts and tribunals system, etcetera and also responsibility regarding FUJITSU developed and – Integrated-Computer-Operating-System ‘ICOS’ and the FUJITSU developed CAUSEWAY computer systems and the information and records, templates, etcetera for these systems and held by these computers systems electronically. This is references by HM-GOVERNMENT’S and the DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE’s own websites.

• GOV.UK and DOJ : ‘The Department of Justice (Northern Ireland) is responsible for the resourcing, legislative and policy framework of the justice system in Northern Ireland.’ https://www.gov.uk/government/organisati... and https://www.justice-ni.gov.uk/about-depa...

• NI DIRECT: ‘The Department of Justice DOJ is also responsible for policy and legislation about criminal law, legal aid policy, the police, prisons and probation.’ https://www.nidirect.gov.uk/articles/int...

I, the claimant, received sufficient responses from 3 other organisations for the same Freedom of Information Act 2000 request / claim that I sent to the DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE. Therefore, it is my reasonable expectation, to also receive a complete and sufficient response from the DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE. These sufficient response are listed below 1 – 3:

1.
Does the specific statutory public office “THE DIRECTOR OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTION SERVICE FOR NORTHERN IRELAND”, expressly and specifically created by statutory legislation, exist?

A Freedom of Information 2000 Response by Police Service of Northern Ireland to Dr. Anne McCloskey on 27 February 2024.
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/d...

2.
Does the specific statutory public office “THE DIRECTOR OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTION SERVICE FOR NORTHERN IRELAND”, expressly and specifically created by statutory legislation, exist?

A Freedom of Information 2000 Response by Northern Ireland Assembly to Dr. Anne McCloskey on 4 March 2024 https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/d...

3.
Does the specific statutory public office “THE DIRECTOR OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTION SERVICE FOR NORTHERN IRELAND”, expressly and specifically created by statutory legislation, exist?

A Freedom of Information 2000 Response by Attorney General for Northern Ireland to Dr. Anne McCloskey on 5 March 2024 https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/d...

REJECTION-AND-REBUTTAL–IN-ITS-ENTIRETY-FOR-THE-ALLEGED-SUGGESTION-BY-AN-UN-NAMED-CIVIL-SERVANT-FOR-THE-DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE-THAT-I-“MAY-WISH-TO-CONSIDER-SEEKING-ADVICE-FROM-A-QUALIFIED-LEGAL-PROFESSIONAL-IN-RELATION-TO-THE-INFORMATION-YOU-REQUIRE”

I, as the claimant, reject and rebut - in its entirety the alleged suggestion: “you may wish to consider seeking advice from a qualified legal professional in relation to the information you require.”

I consider any suggestion from a civil servant / public servant / public office holder based within the DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE that I should “consider seeking legal advice from a private legal professional in relation to the information you require” as direct and intentional discrimination and obstruction against myself for making a reasonable claim / request in accordance to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 18 February 2024 to the DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE.

I consider any advice and suggestion from a civil servant / public servant based within the DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE that I should ‘seek legal advice’ from a private legal firm and or a private sole trader barrister-at-law as a breach of a civil servants / public servants duty of impartiality as a civil servant, public servant and a holder of public office.

I consider any advice from a civil servant / public servant based within the DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE that I should ‘seek legal advice’ from a private legal firm as soliciting for business for those private firms who are under the control of the secretive and members only THE-LAW-SOCIETY-OF-NORTHERN-IRELAND and or soliciting for business for private sole traders who practice as barristers-at-law under the control of the secretive and members only THE-HONORABLE-SOCIETY-OF-THE-INN-OF-COURT-OF-NORTHERN-IRELAND and THE-B.A.R.-OF-NORTHERN IRELAND.

As a civil servant / public servant based within the DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE you are all aware that a civil servant holds a public office and operates in the public in order to serve the public, and you are NOT a private servant, NOR are you as a public servant the private servant for the secretive and members only THE-LAW-SOCIETY-OF-NORTHERN-IRELAND, THE-HONORABLE-SOCIETY-OF-THE-INN-OF-COURT-OF-NORTHERN-IRELAND and THE-B.A.R.-OF-NORTHERN IRELAND, therefore I have the reasonable expectation to be supplied with a full, complete and sufficient response to my FOIA request / claim 18 February 2024 .

The DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE exists for one purpose only - to give services to the public and has no other purpose - This is not a gift or an altruistic service - this is a public service paid for with public money.

As both Respondents are aware, that point 2. of the ‘NORTHERN-IRELAND-CIVIL-SERVICE-CODE-OF-ETHICS’ clearly states:

“Individual civil servants are accountable to their Department’s Minister…”

In this matter that is that the civil servants, including that unnamed civil servant who wrote the DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE alleged response 13 March 2024 and who deliberately is unnamed and therefore accountability for these actions are an impossibility and therefore this is a direct breach of ‘NORTHERN-IRELAND-CIVIL-SERVICE-CODE-OF-ETHICS’ paragraph 3 and a direct breach of the Seven-Principles-of-Public-Life including, but not limited to 1.4 Accountability.

As part of the civil-service contract of employment is that all civil servants are bound to adhere to the ‘NORTHERN-IRELAND-CIVIL-SERVICE-CODE-OF-ETHICS’ available from the DEPARTMENT-OF-FINANCE:

pdf https://www.finance-ni.gov.uk/publicatio... and html version https://www.finance-ni.gov.uk/articles/n... ,

As you know, point 3 of the ‘NORTHERN-IRELAND-CIVIL-SERVICE-CODE-OF-ETHICS’ clearly states:

“3. Civil servants, as holders of public office, are expected to uphold the seven principles of public life. https://www.gov.uk/government/publicatio...

Seven-Principles-of-Public-Life https://www.gov.uk/government/publicatio...

"The Seven Principles of Public Life (also known as the Nolan Principles) apply to anyone who works as a public office-holder. This includes all those who are elected or appointed to public office, nationally and locally, and all people appointed to work in the Civil Service, local government, the police, courts and probation services, non-departmental public bodies (NDPBs), and in the health, education, social and care services. All public office-holders are both servants of the public and stewards of public resources. The principles also apply to all those in other sectors delivering public services."
[emphasis added]

These 7, seven principles include, but are not limited to:

‘1.4 Accountability Holders of public office are accountable to the public for their decisions and actions and MUST submit themselves to the scrutiny necessary to ensure this.’
[emphasis added]

IN-CONCLUSION:-AN-OPPORTUNITY-TO-CURE:

In the event that naomi rachel: long: a living woman doing business as (dba) NAOMI RACHEL LONG acting as MINISTER-OF-JUSTICE and richard: pengelly: a living man doing business as (dba) RICHARD PENGELLY acting as Permanent-Secretary and Principal-Accounting-Officer for DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE failure to supply a full, complete and sufficient Freedom of Information Act 2000 response for my request / claim 18 February 2024 was a mistake, oversight or otherwise unintentional, as the claimant I grant both Respondents an additional 3 days / 72 hours from the date of receipt, to cure the fault and effect the remedy of a full, complete and sufficient Freedom of Information Act 2000 response for my FOIA request / claim 18 February 2024.

I a wait in anticipation for a full, correct and complete response on official DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE letter-headed paper for my specific and precise request / claim 18 February 2024 in accordance to the Freedom of Information Act 2000.

Thank you in anticipation.

WHEREAS the Justice Act (Northern Ireland) 2002 as amended creates the specific statutory public office of the ‘DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS FOR NORTHERN IRELAND’ as a CORPORATION-SOLE under Section 30A, and as such this corporation-sole for a specific statutory public office has a separate and specific legal identity that is distinct from the ‘PUBLIC PROSECUTION SERVICE FOR NORTHERN IRELAND’ as a CORPORATION-AGGREGATE.

Justice (Northern Ireland) Act 2002 as amended https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/200... :
“30A Corporation sole etc
(1) The Director of Public Prosecutions for Northern Ireland is a corporation sole.”

WHEREAS the Justice Act (Northern Ireland) 2002 as amended created the ‘PUBLIC PROSECUTION SERVICE FOR NORTHERN IRELAND’ as a statutory CORPORATION-AGGREGATE under Section 29, and as such this statutory corporation-aggregate has a separate and specific legal identity that is distinct from the ‘DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS FOR NORTHERN IRELAND’ as a CORPORATION-SOLE.

Justice (Northern Ireland) Act 2002 as amended https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/200... :
“29 Public Prosecution Service
(1) There is to be a prosecuting service for Northern Ireland known as the Public Prosecution Service for Northern Ireland.”

THEREFORE in accordance to the Freedom of Information Act:

1. As the Justice Act (Northern Ireland) 2002 as amended created the specific statutory public office of the ‘DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS FOR NORTHERN IRELAND’ as a corporation-sole under Section 30A and also created the ‘PUBLIC PROSECUTION SERVICE FOR NORTHERN IRELAND’ as a statutory corporation-aggregate under Section 29, THEREFORE you are required to ‘confirm or deny’* if there is another specific statutory public office of “THE DIRECTOR OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTION SERVICE FOR NORTHERN IRELAND” (take notice of the specific wording) that exists and was expressly and specifically created by statutory legislation.

-Please respond by selecting either YES 1A. or NO 1B. as specified below:

1A. YES, “THE DIRECTOR OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTION SERVICE FOR NORTHERN IRELAND” exists as a specific statutory public office and was expressly and specifically, created by statutory legislation. Please go next to 1A(i) and 1A(ii).

OR

1B. NO, “THE DIRECTOR OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTION SERVICE FOR NORTHERN IRELAND” as a specific statutory public office does not exist.

1A(i). If YES, and the specific public statutory office “THE DIRECTOR OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTION SERVICE FOR NORTHERN IRELAND” does exist, please provide the specific statutory legislation that expressly and specifically created the statutory public office “THE DIRECTOR OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTION SERVICE FOR NORTHERN IRELAND”, along with the year it was created, the specific section, article and or sub section and the working link to www.legislation.gov.uk for the specific statutory legislation, in order to verify that specific legislation.

1A(ii). If YES, and the specific public statutory office “THE DIRECTOR OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTION SERVICE FOR NORTHERN IRELAND” does exist, please also provide the full name of the current public statutory office holder for “THE DIRECTOR OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTION SERVICE FOR NORTHERN IRELAND” and the date that he or she was appointed.

*As a public servant you are aware, that it is your duty “to confirm or deny” in accordance to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 Part I ‘Right to Information’ Section I.

I require each item to have its own specific response that is clearly numbered 1A., 1A(i) and 1A(ii) or 1B.

I do not consent to receiving false information / statements, deceitful at common law information / statements, incorrect information / statements, misleading information / statements, dishonest information / statements, misrepresentations and or false representations in any Freedom of Information Act 2000 responses / claims.

As you are aware, a public servant holds a public office and operates in the public in order to serve and protect the public, and is NOT a private servant, thus a public servant’s full name and job title must NOT be redacted in order that there can be accountability for all acts and or omissions.

“Accountability: Holders of public office are accountable to the public for their decisions and actions and must submit themselves to the scrutiny necessary to ensure this.”
https://www.gov.uk/government/publicatio...

The information requested / claimed is of public interest as there must be openness, transparency, accountability and honesty regarding the MINSTER-OF-JUSTICE, DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS FOR NORTHERN IRELAND, the judiciary, constables, civil servants, members of the Northern Ireland Civil Service, public servants, etcetera.

The public statutory office MINISTER-OF-JUSTICE and the DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE exists for 1, one, purpose only - to serve the people and has no other purpose. This is not a gift or an altruistic service - it is a public service.

I have the reasonable expectation that you, naomi rachel: long: a living woman, doing business as (dba) NAOMI RACHEL LONG acting as a public servant in the public office MINISTER-OF-JUSTICE for the EXECUTIVE-COMMITTEE-OF-THE-ASSEMBY, will honour and adhere to, your position of trust, the Seven Principles of Public Life, ministerial code, your duty of care, duty of candour, common law obligations, statutory obligations and protocols that govern public servants.

I have the reasonable expectation that you, richard: pengelly: a living man, doing business as (dba) RICHARD PENGELLY acting as a public servant in the public office Permanent Secretary for the DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE, will honour and adhere to, your position of trust, the Seven Principles of Public Life, your duty of care, duty of candour, common law obligations, statutory obligations and protocols that govern public servants.

The, 7, seven principles of public life are: Honesty; Accountability; Openness; Leadership; Integrity; Objectivity and Selflessness. https://www.gov.uk/government/publicatio...

This notice will be used as material evidence.

This notice is sent without ill will, without vexation, and without frivolity.

You are also hereby noticed that it is not my intention to harass, to intimidate, to threaten, to abuse, to offend, to conspire, to blackmail, to coerce, to cause harm, anxiety, alarm or distress, as the information presented here is done so with peaceful and honourable intentions and is part of due process.

You have been noticed. I have the reasonable expectation that you will govern yourself accordingly.

…………………………….…………………With honour and in pure truth,

………………………..………….………………….…….….....................…By: mary anne:
………...………………………………………………….………………….All rights reserved:
……….……………………..………………………….………………All Freedoms Reserved:
….…………………………..…………...........Acting in the capacity of Dr Anne McCloskey:
….....…….………..….Settlor, Executor and Beneficiary for any and all derivatives of / for
….…………….………….......………………the commercial title MARY ANNE MCCLOSKEY:
………………..……..………………………………………Without recourse Non-Assumpsit:
…………………….…………………………………………………………………………I.N.J.

C.c. To all whom it may concern.

Notice to the principal is notice to the agent, Notice to the agent is notice to the principal

The rest of this page is left intentionally blank.

DOJ Minister's Office, Department of Justice (Northern Ireland)

1 Attachment

Please see attached letter issued on behalf of the Private Secretary.

 

Regards,

 

DoJ Minister’s Office

Dr. Anne Mc Closkey

……………………2nd-NOTICE-FOR-DEFAULT-OPPORTUNITY-TO-CURE

…………………NOTICE-FOR-REJECTION-IN-ITS-ENTIRETY-REGARDING-
……………THE-FREEDOM-OF-INFORMATION-ACT-2000-REPSONSE
………………………………………..DATED-21-MARCH-2024

……………………….NOTICE-FOR-FREEDOM-OF-INFORMATION-ACT-2000
………………………………….REQUEST-DATED-18-FEBRUARY-2024
.……………………………………FOR-THE-PUBLIC-RECORD

..............................................Applicable-to-All-Successors-and-Assigns

…….………………….……………..………………………………………………mary anne:
……………...……..………………...………acting in the capacity as ‘Dr Anne McCloskey’
…………………………………………………………….Hereinafter: “I”, “me”, “my”, “myself”
………..…............................................... ………….………………………….27 March 2024

Notice to the principal is notice to the agent, Notice to the agent is notice to the principal

naomi rachel: long: a living woman
doing business as (dba) NAOMI RACHEL LONG
acting as MINISTER-OF-JUSTICE
for EXECUTIVE-COMMITTEE-OF-THE-ASSEMBLY
DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE
Block B, Castle Buildings,
Stormont Estate, Belfast

richard: pengelly: a living man
doing business as (dba) RICHARD PENGELLY
acting as Permanent-Secretary and
Principal-Accounting-Officer
for DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE
Block B, Castle Buildings,
Stormont Estate, Belfast

timothy: logan: a living man
doing business as (dba) TIM LOGAN
acting as Private-Secretary
for DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE
Minsters-Office
Block B, Castle Buildings,
Stormont Estate, Belfast

Hereinafter: “you”, “your” and “yourself”, “Respondents”

Does the specific statutory public office “THE DIRECTOR OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTION SERVICE FOR NORTHERN IRELAND”, expressly and specifically created by statutory legislation, exist?

Greetings naomi rachel: long:, richard: pengelly: and timothy: logan:

I, mary anne: acting in the capacity as Dr Anne McCloskey, claimant, private civilian, sui juris, a living woman of peace, hereby claiming all rights nunc pro tunc:

I, as the claimant, hereby give notice that on the 21 March 2024, I was disturbed by a letter that was without a Freedom of Information Act 2000 request / claim ‘FOI reference number’ received via whatdotheyknow.com from a now named civil servant: timothy: logan: a living man doing business as (dba) TIM LOGAN acting as Private-Secretary for DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE and timothy: logan: dba Tim Logan has also acted as the Departmental-Assembly-Liaison-Office “DALO” for DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE, liaising between the clerks, civil servants for the NORTHERN-IRELAND-ASSEMBLY.

This correspondence / letter sent on the 21 March 2024 from timothy: logan: a living man doing business as (dba) TIM LOGAN acting as Private-Secretary for the DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE stated:

“EXISTENCE OF OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTION SERVICE FOR NORTHERN IRELAND”

“Thank you for your FoI request in which you raise queries in relation to the Public Prosecution Service for Northern Ireland (PPSNI). As the nature of the request does not relate directly to information held by the Department, this has been treated as a Line of Business request.

“The PPSNI is independent of the Department of Justice and is a non-Ministerial Department. It is therefore not appropriate for the Department to provide any view on the legislation underpinning the establishment of the PPSNI and the role of Director of Public Prosecutions for Northern Ireland.”

I, as the claimant, reject and rebut - in its entirety – and I do not consent to and I do not accept in any way timothy: logan: dba TIM LOGAN acting as Private-Secretary’s for DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE correspondence / letter dated the 21 March 2024 including, but not limited to, falsely representing and deceitfully misrepresenting my Freedom of Information Act 2000 request / claim dated 18 February 2024.

I, as the claimant, do not consent to in any way to the content for timothy: logan: dba TIM LOGAN acting as Private Secretary for the DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE’s letter dated the 21 March 2024 regarding my Freedom of Information Act 2000 request / claim dated 18 February 2024 to the DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE.

I, as the claimant, state that it is a truthful fact that the subject of my Freedom of Information Act 2000 request / claim dated 18 February 2024 and as published on whatdotheyknow.com is:

“Does the specific statutory public office “THE DIRECTOR OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTION SERVICE FOR NORTHERN IRELAND”, expressly and specifically created by statutory legislation, exist?”

I, as the claimant, state that it is a truthful fact that to alleged that that the subject of my Freedom of Information Act 2000 request / claim dated 18 February 2024 is “EXISTENCE OF OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTION SERVICE FOR NORTHERN IRELAND” is untrue, dishonest, deceitful, is a false representation and is a misrepresentation of the subject of my Freedom of Information Act 2000 request / claim dated 18 February 2024.

I, as the claimant, state that it is a truthful fact that my Freedom of Information Act 2000 request / claim dated 18 February 2024 relates directly to information and records held by the DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE, and under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 civil servants for DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE must ‘confirm or deny’ that information is held by civil servants with DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE.

I, as the claimant, state that it is a truthful fact that my Freedom of Information Act 2000 request / claim dated 18 February 2024 is specifically and directly regarding information and records held by the DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE and to allege that “as the nature of the request does not relate directly to information held by the Department, this has been treated as a Line of Business request” is deceitful, a is a false representation and a misrepresentation of the subject of my Freedom of Information Act 2000 request / claim dated 18 February 2024.

I do not consent for my Freedom of Information Act 2000 request / claim dated 18 February 2024 to be “treated” by any civil servant within the DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE as an alleged “Line of Business request.” I consider an alleged “Line of Business request” as a sham device to block, obstruct and prevent a response to my Freedom of Information Act 2000 request / claim dated 18 February 2024.

It is common knowledge and has been widely reported in the legacy media for years that civil servants including senior civil servants within government departments were involved in act and omissions to actively avoid disclosing information and avoid their duties and obligations under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. A selection of many examples below:

• In 2018, the Scottish Information Commissioner concluded that the Scottish executive had engaged in ‘deliberate delaying tactics [with] requests being blocked or refused for tenuous reasons’;

• In the 2018 – Renewable Heat Incentive “RHI” / “Ash for Cash” scandal, inquiry and media coverage regarding the acts and omissions of civil servant within DEPARTMENT-OF-ENTERPRISE-TRADE-AND-INVESTMENT and the NORTHERN IRELAND EXECUTIVE regarding avoiding Freedom of Information Act 2000 obligations and duties.

• See ‘Research Handbook on Information Policy’ edited by Alistair S Duff, 2021.
• but not limited to these.

I reasonably believe that civil servants within DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE are through their acts and omissions, trying to block, conceal and obstruct my Freedom of Information Act 2000 request / claim dated 18 February 2024.

I, as the claimant, state that it is a truthful fact that my Freedom of Information Act 2000 request / claim dated 18 February 2024 doses not “raise queries in relation to the Public Prosecution Service for Northern Ireland” as alleged with the letter dated 21 March 2024, to suggest as such is deceitful, is a false representation and a misrepresentation of my FOIA request / claim dated 18 February 2024.

I, as the claimant, state that it is a truthful fact that my Freedom of Information Act 2000 request / claim dated 18 February 2024 doses not ask the civil servants for the DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE to “provide any view on the legislation underpinning the establishment of the PPSNI and the role of Director of Public Prosecutions for Northern Ireland” and to suggest such is deceitful, is a false representation and a misrepresentation of my FOIA request / claim dated 18 February 2024.

My Freedom of Information Act 2000 request / claim dated 18 February 2024 is reasonable and qualifies as a Freedom of Information Act 2000 request / claim.

My Freedom of Information Act 2000 request / claim dated 18 February 2024 is in the public interest, as the MINISTER-OF-JUSTICE supported by public servants, civil servants and/or agents for the DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE have overall responsibility for the legislation, information, records such as briefings, assessments on legislation and proposed legislation, and policy framework documents and briefings regarding the entire justice system, the courts and tribunals system, etcetera, and the MINISTER-OF-JUSTICE also has overall responsibility regarding FUJITSU developed and – Integrated-Computer-Operating-System ‘ICOS’ and the FUJITSU developed CAUSEWAY computer systems regarding the entire criminal justice system and the information and records, templates, etcetera for these electronic systems and held by these computers systems electronically for DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE.

timothy: logan: dba TIM LOGAN acting as Private Secretary for the DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE would have excellent knowledge regarding the information and records held within DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE and the “legislation underpinning the establishment of…. the role of Director of Public Prosecutions for Northern Ireland” as he himself has create information and records regarding the DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE including, but not limited to, the Justice (Northern Ireland) Act 2002 and has made his and the Minister of Justice’s “views” and assessments regarding “the role of Director of Public Prosecutions for Northern Ireland” openly in the public domain:

“…The Minister [Minister of Justice] has indicated that he has serious concerns about the impact of this Clause. Our assessment is that it goes too far; that it runs counter to the statutory obligations placed on the Director of Public Prosecutions under the Justice (Northern Ireland) Act 2002…” [emphasis added]

From Tim Logan, DALO, Departmental Assembly Liaison Officer, for DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE “DOJ”, briefing paper to the Justice-Committee for NORTHERN-IRELAND-ASSEMBLY, DOJ Business Area: Protection and Organised Crime Division and Criminal Justice Policy and Legislation Division, written submission to the
http://www.niassembly.gov.uk/globalasset...

My Freedom of Information Act 2000 request / claim dated 18 February 2024 relates directly to information, records and or documents held by DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE. I have clarified to civil servants within the DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE that my FOIA request / claim includes, but is not limited to:

• any sort of information and or record

• information and records that were authored by public servants, civil servants and/or agents for the DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE.

• any information such as a record, briefing paper, correspondence, departmental correspondence, policy paper update, update to the Justice Committee of the NORTHERN-IRELAND-ASSEMBLY,

• any sort of any published legislation and or statute that public servants, civil servants and/or agents for the DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE have downloaded or printed or electronic information, records, computer files and or templates kept on the FUJITSU developed – Integrated-Computer-Operating-System ‘ICOS’ and the FUJITSU developed CAUSEWAY computer system, but not limited to these systems.

I as the claimant, can only reasonably consider that timothy: logan: dba Tim Logan acting as Private Secretary for DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE’s letter dated the 21 March 2024 was made in bad faith in the attempt to deprive me of my rights including, but not limited to, information rights regarding my Freedom of Information Act 2000 request / claim dated 18 February 2024 that was made in good faith by myself to the Respondents for DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE.

I, as the claimant, consider Tim Logan’s letter date 21 March 2024, as the 3rd (third) attempt by civil servants within the DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE to obstruct and block disclosure of information and records held or not held, ‘confirm or deny’ in accordance to the Freedom of Information Act 2000, by civil servants within the DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE regarding my Freedom of Information Act 2000 request / claim dated 18 February 2024.

I, as the claimant, respectfully have no other choice, but to reasonably believe based on material evidence that this 21 March 2024 letter is put forward as a bad faith attempt to obstruct and block disclosure of information and records held or not held, ‘confirm or deny’, by civil servants within the DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE regarding my Freedom of Information Act 2000 request / claim dated 18 February 2024.

Respectfully, I as the claimant further remind and give notice to timothy: logan: dba TIM LOGAN acting as Private Secretary, the named Respondents and all civil servants, employees and agents for DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE for your duties and obligations under the Freedom of Information Act 2000, including, but not limited to, under section 77 ‘Offence of altering etc. records with intent to prevent disclosure’.

Section 77 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 clearly states:

“(1)Where—

(a) a request for information has been made to a public authority, and

(b) under section 1 of this Act ... the applicant would have been entitled (subject to payment of any fee) to communication of any information in accordance with that section, any person to whom this subsection applies is guilty of an offence if he alters, defaces, blocks, erases, destroys or conceals any record held by the public authority, with the intention of preventing the disclosure by that authority of all, or any part, of the information to the communication of which the applicant would have been entitled.

(2) Subsection (1) applies to the public authority and to any person who is employed by, is an officer of, or is subject to the direction of, the public authority.”

I, as the claimant, state that it is a truthful fact that the INFORMATION-COMMISSIONER’S-OFFICE “ICO” guidance for public authorities that includes, but is not limited to DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE clearly outlines what make a valid request / claim:

INFORMATION-COMMISSIONER’S-OFFICE’s “ICO”:
What is the FOI Act and are we covered?

“…everybody has a right to access official information. Disclosure of information should be the default”

INFORMATION-COMMISSIONER’S-OFFICE’s “ICO”:
‘Guide to Managing An FOI Request: What makes a valid request’:

‘To be valid under the Act [Freedom of Information Act 2000], the request must:

• be in writing. This could be a letter or email … ;
• include the requester’s real name…;
• include an address for correspondence…a postal address or email address;
• describe the information requested. Any genuine attempt to describe the information will be enough to trigger the Act …’

This is not a hard test to satisfy. Almost anything in writing which asks for information will count as a request under the Act …” [emphasis added] https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/foi...

So why are civil servants within the DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE repeatedly trying to block and obstruct my Freedom of Information Act 2000 request / claim when it clearly qualifies as a Freedom of Information Act 2000 request / claim?

Are these attempts to block and obstruct my Freedom of Information Act 2000 request / claim because if the civil servants within the DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE respond and ‘confirm or deny’ it will reveal inconvenient information to the public that civil servants with the DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE are trying to conceal?

I, the claimant, received sufficient responses from 3 other organisations for the same Freedom of Information Act 2000 request / claim that I sent to the DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE and all responded to under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. Therefore, it is my reasonable expectation, to also receive a complete and sufficient response from the DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE. These sufficient response are listed below 1 – 3:

1.
Does the specific statutory public office “THE DIRECTOR OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTION SERVICE FOR NORTHERN IRELAND”, expressly and specifically created by statutory legislation, exist?

A Freedom of Information 2000 Response by Police Service of Northern Ireland to Dr. Anne McCloskey on 27 February 2024.
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/d...

2.
Does the specific statutory public office “THE DIRECTOR OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTION SERVICE FOR NORTHERN IRELAND”, expressly and specifically created by statutory legislation, exist?

A Freedom of Information 2000 Response by Northern Ireland Assembly to Dr. Anne McCloskey on 4 March 2024 https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/d...

3.
Does the specific statutory public office “THE DIRECTOR OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTION SERVICE FOR NORTHERN IRELAND”, expressly and specifically created by statutory legislation, exist?

A Freedom of Information 2000 Response by Attorney General for Northern Ireland to Dr. Anne McCloskey on 5 March 2024 https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/d...

Why do civil servants within the DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE feel that they are somehow different and or superior over to these other public authorities / government bodies regarding duties and obligations under the Freedom of Information Act 2000?

Why are civil servants for DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE not complying with their duties and obligations under the Freedom of Information Act 2000?

Respectfully, I remind you that all civil servants, employees and agents for DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE of your duties and obligations under section 75 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998 regarding my Freedom of Information Act 2000 request / claim dated 18 February 2024 and I reasonably consider the acts and omissions of civil servants with DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE regarding my Freedom of Information Act 2000 request / claim dated 18 February 2024 as direct discrimination as described in section 75 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998.

IN-CONCLUSION:-A-FINAL-OPPORTUNITY-TO-CURE:

In the event that naomi rachel: long: a living woman doing business as (dba) NAOMI RACHEL LONG acting as MINISTER-OF-JUSTICE and richard: pengelly: a living man
doing business as (dba) RICHARD PENGELLY acting as Permanent-Secretary and
Principal-Accounting-Officer for DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE failure to supply a full, complete and sufficient Freedom of Information Act 2000 response for my request / claim 18 February 2024 was an oversight or otherwise unintentional, as the claimant I grant both Respondents an additional 3 days / 72 hours from the date of receipt, to cure the fault and effect the remedy of a full, complete and sufficient Freedom of Information Act 2000 response for my FOIA request / claim 18 February 2024.

I a wait for a full, correct and complete Freedom of Information Act 2000 response / claim on official DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE letter-headed paper for my specific and precise request / claim 18 February 2024 in accordance to the Freedom of Information Act 2000.

Thank you in anticipation.

WHEREAS the Justice Act (Northern Ireland) 2002 as amended creates the specific statutory public office of the ‘DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS FOR NORTHERN IRELAND’ as a CORPORATION-SOLE under Section 30A, and as such this corporation-sole for a specific statutory public office has a separate and specific legal identity that is distinct from the ‘PUBLIC PROSECUTION SERVICE FOR NORTHERN IRELAND’ as a CORPORATION-AGGREGATE.

Justice (Northern Ireland) Act 2002 as amended https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/200... :
“30A Corporation sole etc
(1) The Director of Public Prosecutions for Northern Ireland is a corporation sole.”

WHEREAS the Justice Act (Northern Ireland) 2002 as amended created the ‘PUBLIC PROSECUTION SERVICE FOR NORTHERN IRELAND’ as a statutory CORPORATION-AGGREGATE under Section 29, and as such this statutory corporation-aggregate has a separate and specific legal identity that is distinct from the ‘DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS FOR NORTHERN IRELAND’ as a CORPORATION-SOLE.

Justice (Northern Ireland) Act 2002 as amended https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/200... :
“29 Public Prosecution Service
(1) There is to be a prosecuting service for Northern Ireland known as the Public Prosecution Service for Northern Ireland.”

THEREFORE in accordance to the Freedom of Information Act:

1. As the Justice Act (Northern Ireland) 2002 as amended created the specific statutory public office of the ‘DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS FOR NORTHERN IRELAND’ as a corporation-sole under Section 30A and also created the ‘PUBLIC PROSECUTION SERVICE FOR NORTHERN IRELAND’ as a statutory corporation-aggregate under Section 29, THEREFORE you are required to ‘confirm or deny’* if there is another specific statutory public office of “THE DIRECTOR OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTION SERVICE FOR NORTHERN IRELAND” (take notice of the specific wording) that exists and was expressly and specifically created by statutory legislation.

-Please respond by selecting either YES 1A. or NO 1B. as specified below:

1A. YES, “THE DIRECTOR OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTION SERVICE FOR NORTHERN IRELAND” exists as a specific statutory public office and was expressly and specifically, created by statutory legislation. Please go next to 1A(i) and 1A(ii).

OR

1B. NO, “THE DIRECTOR OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTION SERVICE FOR NORTHERN IRELAND” as a specific statutory public office does not exist.

1A(i). If YES, and the specific public statutory office “THE DIRECTOR OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTION SERVICE FOR NORTHERN IRELAND” does exist, please provide the specific statutory legislation that expressly and specifically created the statutory public office “THE DIRECTOR OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTION SERVICE FOR NORTHERN IRELAND”, along with the year it was created, the specific section, article and or sub section and the working link to www.legislation.gov.uk for the specific statutory legislation, in order to verify that specific legislation.

1A(ii). If YES, and the specific public statutory office “THE DIRECTOR OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTION SERVICE FOR NORTHERN IRELAND” does exist, please also provide the full name of the current public statutory office holder for “THE DIRECTOR OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTION SERVICE FOR NORTHERN IRELAND” and the date that he or she was appointed.

*As a public servant you are aware, that it is your duty “to confirm or deny” in accordance to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 Part I ‘Right to Information’ Section I.

I require each item to have its own specific response that is clearly numbered 1A., 1A(i) and 1A(ii) or 1B.

I do not consent to receiving false information / statements, deceitful at common law information / statements, incorrect information / statements, misleading information / statements, dishonest information / statements, misrepresentations and or false representations in any Freedom of Information Act 2000 responses / claims.

As you are aware, a public servant holds a public office and operates in the public in order to serve and protect the public, and is NOT a private servant, thus a public servant’s full name and job title must NOT be redacted in order that there can be accountability for all acts and or omissions.

“Accountability: Holders of public office are accountable to the public for their decisions and actions and must submit themselves to the scrutiny necessary to ensure this.”
https://www.gov.uk/government/publicatio...

The information requested / claimed is of public interest as there must be openness, transparency, accountability and honesty regarding the MINSTER-OF-JUSTICE, DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS FOR NORTHERN IRELAND, the judiciary, constables, civil servants, members of the Northern Ireland Civil Service, public servants, etcetera.

The public statutory office MINISTER-OF-JUSTICE and the DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE exists for 1, one, purpose only - to serve the people and has no other purpose. This is not a gift or an altruistic service - it is a public service.

I have the reasonable expectation that you, naomi rachel: long: a living woman, doing business as (dba) NAOMI RACHEL LONG acting as a public servant in the public office MINISTER-OF-JUSTICE for the EXECUTIVE-COMMITTEE-OF-THE-ASSEMBY, will honour and adhere to, your position of trust, the Seven Principles of Public Life, ministerial code, your duty of care, duty of candour, common law obligations, statutory obligations and protocols that govern public servants.

I have the reasonable expectation that you, richard: pengelly: a living man, doing business as (dba) RICHARD PENGELLY acting as a public servant in the public office Permanent Secretary for the DEPARTMENT-OF-JUSTICE, will honour and adhere to, your position of trust, the Seven Principles of Public Life, your duty of care, duty of candour, common law obligations, statutory obligations and protocols that govern public servants.

The, 7, seven principles of public life are: Honesty; Accountability; Openness; Leadership; Integrity; Objectivity and Selflessness. https://www.gov.uk/government/publicatio...

This notice will be used as material evidence.

This notice is sent without ill will, without vexation, and without frivolity.

You are also hereby noticed that it is not my intention to harass, to intimidate, to threaten, to abuse, to offend, to conspire, to blackmail, to coerce, to cause harm, anxiety, alarm or distress, as the information presented here is done so with peaceful and honourable intentions and is part of due process.

You have been noticed. I have the reasonable expectation that you will govern yourself accordingly.

…………………………….…………………With honour and in pure truth,

………………………..……..................…….………..………….…….………By: mary anne:
………...……………………………….………………….………………….All rights reserved:
……….……………………..………………………….………………All Freedoms Reserved:
……………………………………………………………………………………Private-civilian:
….…………………………..…………...........Acting in the capacity as Dr Anne McCloskey:
….....…….………..….Settlor, Executor and Beneficiary for any and all derivatives of / for
….…………….…………………………… the commercial title MARY ANNE MCCLOSKEY:
………………..……..………………………………………Without recourse Non-Assumpsit:
…………………….…………………………………………………………………………I.N.J.

C.c. To all whom it may concern.

Notice to the principal is notice to the agent, Notice to the agent is notice to the principal

The rest of this page is left intentionally blank.

DOJ Data Protection Officer, Department of Justice (Northern Ireland)

1 Attachment

Good afternoon,

With reference to your email below, please see attached response.

Regards,

DOJ Data Protection Officer

show quoted sections