Does audio and video recording allowed In UK

Waiting for an internal review by Supreme Court of the United Kingdom of their handling of this request.

From: Vijay Singh

Date 03/08/2013

Dear Supreme Court of the United Kingdom,

I would like to know under what circumstances one can use audio and video recording of an individual to protect from scams ?

or

Does court of united kingdom consider audio and video recording as a proof to protect individual against any conspiracy in any area ?

Yours faithfully,

Vijay

Brigland, Paul (Supreme Court),

I will be away from the office from Wednesday 31 July until Friday 16 August, returning on Monday 19 August 2013.

If you enquiry relates to an urgent IT matter, please contact Rake Orekie or Daniel Money.

For all other queries, I will be monitoring e-mails but may not respond immediately.

Paul Brigland| Head of ICT Services & Departmental Records Officer | Supreme Court of the United Kingdom | Parliament Square | London | SW1P 3BD

* email: [email address] | telephone: +44 (0)20 7960 1983

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s).
Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the
intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and
read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in
response to this message by e-mail.

This email has been sent from an email service operated for the UK Supreme Court by the
Ministry of Justice (MoJ). Communication via this service may be automatically logged,
monitored and/or recorded for legal and service support purposes, and emails identified
as containing malicious or inappropriate content may be blocked.

Emails on this service will not be read by anyone except the sender or intended recipient
unless there is a genuine legal requirement to do so and only with the appropriate lawful authority.

With respect to any email sent or received by a judge, the 'appropriate authority' will
be a senior member of the judiciary or other authority as agreed with the judiciary.
(For this purpose of this statement references to the 'judiciary' and 'judge' includes
all full time, part time and deputy judges, Recorders and all legal and non-legal members
of Tribunals, whether salaried or fee-paid who use judicial information in order to under take their duties.)

It is UKSC and MoJ policy to comply with all legal and regulatory requirements in the handling
of email communications. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing
or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

show quoted sections

Dear Supreme Court of the United Kingdom,

The request seems to be delayed now and by law it should have been
replied by 3 September 2013. Could you please confirm what is the
progress and when it can be available ?

Yours faithfully,

Vijay