District Judge Susan Sullivan “favors” Maidstone Borough Council

ivanataylor made this Freedom of Information request to Judicial Conduct Investigations Office

This request has been closed to new correspondence from the public body. Contact us if you think it ought be re-opened.

Response to this request is long overdue. By law, under all circumstances, Judicial Conduct Investigations Office should have responded by now (details). You can complain by requesting an internal review.

Dear Judicial Conduct Investigations Office,
District Judge Susan Sullivan “favors” Maidstone Borough Council

(1) On how many occasions has District Judge Susan Sullivan adjourned to allow Maidstone Borough Council further time to produce court documentation in their favour to enable the council to force through an order ( charging order or bankruptcy order) from the county court they wish to use to enforce council tax.

(2) On how many occasions has District Judge Susan Sullivan allowed LPC Law ( an agency supplying outside solicitor “agents” ) Agents who have no privity with Maidstone Borough Council or J E Baring & Co Solicitors acting as solicitors for Maidstone Borough Council to attend her hearings.

For instance I along with several others was present on 6th November 2012 when District Judge Susan Sullivan allowed Miss Shipley from LPC Law who is neither an employee of LPC Law or J E Baring & Co Solicitors therefore with no rights of audience into the court , who pretended to be a solicitor but refused to give her full name or produce a business card. District Judge Susan Sullivan not only allowed Miss Shipley to speak but had a private meeting with her before hand. District Judge Susan Sullivan adjourned the hearing to grant Maidstone Borough Council more time to produce further documentation.

(3) Would this have been the case the other way round , I very much doubt it ?

On 12th June 2014 District Judge Susan Sullivan not only allowed Ms Gee from LPC Law into the court but granted her rights of audience even though she has no privity with Maidstone Borough Council and is not an employee of J E Baring & Co Solicitors and is also not a solicitor.

(4) What special extra ordinary circumstances did the Judge rely on to grant such an audience when an objection had been raised quoting the Legal services Act 2007 ?

On 3rd March 2015 District Judge Susan Sullivan yet again allowed Anna Rachel Goodwin a solicitor on this occasion acting as a solicitors Agent for LPC Law to enter the court this time with Mrs Shelia Coburn from Maidstone Borough Council , yet again this 'Agent' had no rights of audience and objections raised were ignored by the district judge who allowed both to stay throughout the hearing.

(5) Why has District Judge Susan Sullivan yet again adjourned to grant the council more time to produce a certificate of service ( that should have been produced on the day) from the process server Russell Sargent J S Knott Legal Services Ltd on behalf of Allan James Hooper from J E Baring & Co Solicitors who signed a statutory demand and NOT of course from LPC Law who have no privity or rights of audience which is a criminal offence ?

Also it is extremely worrying that District Susan Sullivan made it clear in front of an elected Councillor from Maidstone Borough Council a good Christian man who was also present as a note taker that effectively God's Law aka Equity does not exist in the courts.

(6)Do the courts no longer operate under what is fair, right and just or are they based on force, fear and ill will ?

(7) I therefore wish to know how many more complaints have been received concerning District Judge Susan Sullivan and on how many more occasions she has shown favour which is not allowed under the Judicial Oath she took.

"I, _________ , do swear by Almighty God that I will well and truly serve
our Sovereign Lady Queen Elizabeth the Second in the office of ________ ,
and I will do right to all manner of people after the laws and usages of
this realm, without fear or favour, affection or ill will. "

(music) Under what special circumstances is District Judge Susan Sullivan allowed to ignore the Legal Services Act 2007 relating to rights of audience in the court in favour of Maidstone Borough Council using third/fourth party interveners not being their solicitors. And what actions if any have been taken to stop this abuse of powers .

(9) Why has this District Judge never required the council to produce a liability order sealed by the Magistrates Court or are the county courts a rubber-stamping exercise for the council ?

(10) So as not to reject this request for being too costly to answer . At the bear minimum provide all information that relates to whether or not this Judge has been investigated. And whether or not the courts are required to operate under the authority of God's law which is what Equity requires ?

Yours faithfully,

ivanataylor

Customer OJC,

Thank you for your email. We will respond to your correspondence within 15
working days.

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying
is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy
all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message
could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in
mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message
by e-mail.

This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be
read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not
broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

show quoted sections

Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.

ivanataylor left an annotation ()

Since when do Corporate Rights overturn the rights of individual people.?

Danny Bamping left an annotation ()

because when its council tax enforcement, or anything liability order wise, its the poor law, kings privy council, no cpr rules and not a court of law...perhaps the above should be reported as crimes to the Police; because thats exactly what they are.

South East KILO,

1 Attachment

Dear Ivana Taylor,

Please find attached.

Kind regards,

South East Regional Support Unit
[email address]
South East GoldFax: 0870 739 4026

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying
is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message
could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in
mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message
by e-mail.

This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be
read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not
broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

show quoted sections

South East KILO,

1 Attachment

Dear Ivana Taylor,

Please find attached.

Kind regards,

South East Regional Support Unit
[email address]
South East GoldFax: 0870 739 4026

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying
is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message
could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in
mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message
by e-mail.

This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be
read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not
broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

show quoted sections

ivanataylor left an annotation ()

This FOI request is not vexatious but a mere reflection of what is actually happening. Have they actually read their own policy ?

MOJ Anti Fraud and Corruption Policy Nov 2014.pdf

Anti-Fraud and Corruption Policy

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) requires all staff to act honestly and with integrity at all times....

The MoJ's policy on fraud and corruption is one of zero tolerance, whether involving its own staff, or other external individuals or bodies. It is MoJ's policy to refer all instances of fraud both actual and reasonably suspected to the relevant police authorities. All cases will be thoroughly investigated and dealt with appropriately. This policy statement sets out responsibilities with regard to the prevention, detection and reporting of fraud, and applies to all staff within the MoJ.

Fraud is a criminal offence. A general offence of fraud was created by the Fraud Act 2006.

The three ways that fraud can be committed, as set out in the Act, are by:

False representation

Failure to disclose information when there is a legal duty to do so

Abuse of position

In each case (for example, through making a false representation) an individual must intend to make a gain for themselves or another, or to cause loss to another, or expose another to a risk of loss.

Offences such as theft, corruption, false accounting, forgery, counterfeiting and blackmail are separate offences enacted by other legislation. Further, there remains a common law offence of conspiracy to defraud.

e.g. by altering, substituting, destroying records or creating spurious records ….

If the outcome of a fraud investigation concludes that there is a reasonable suspicion of fraud having been committed, MoJ will put the matter in the hands of the police and a criminal prosecution may result. Disciplinary procedures include suspension pending the outcome of an investigation, disciplinary interview and post-hearing disciplinary action.

Bribery and Corruption

Corruption can be defined as ‘an act done with intent to give
some advantage which is inconsistent with official duty and the rights of others’. It is the abuse of power by a public official for private gain and includes bribery and bias.

Examples of Instances of Fraud

Theft – defined as dishonestly appropriating property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving them of it, for example theft of official cash or a colleague’s personal belongings.

Corruption – abuse of official position for personal advantage or gain

Extortion – to obtain money or favours by intimidation, violence or misuse of authority

Deception – the act of deceiving someone
Providing information that is untrue to gain benefit, e.g. giving false information.

Concealment of Facts– to cover and hide, to keep secret

Misappropriation –to take and use money dishonestly

Forgery – illegal copying, crime of making fraudulent imitation
Falsifying authorising officers’ signatures on documents for gain or to conceal other misdemeanours.

Conspiracy– a secret plan to carry out an illegal or harmful act

Collusion -secret/illegal agreement or co-operation

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/3...

ivanataylor left an annotation ()

Article 7 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948 stated, " All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination".

Try telling this to my friend Former MBC Cllr Sheena Williams
who is still being stitched up this time for her home !

http://kentfreedommovement.com/profiles/...

ivanataylor left an annotation ()

Council and court corruption -service of statutory demands and petitions

Is this how council's get around correct service of statutory demands and bankruptcy petitions ?

Pay an outside solicitor's firm to pay a process server , they used to pay directly ?

Arrange for them to turn up late or early , anything other than the correct time, so that they can then go to the brought and paid for court for substituted service, and make out you have avoided them.

They will lie about speaking to neighbours etc and eventually knock up a 'statement of truth' with no risk of perjury, as they know that no questions will be allowed to be asked, and absolutely no chance of them being made accountable for their actions, in the part they played. in the. 'grand deception'

The specially selected. "judge" will say " how are you prejudiced ?- you are here now arn't you " . Never mind that the service was incorrect and you have evidence to prove it .

ivanataylor left an annotation ()

When is a bankruptcy not a bankruptcy – when the corrupt operate within our courts ?

The corrupt council staff target individuals in the same corrupt courts used by the local authority child stealers.

The council will use any money you pay to reduce the amount to below the bankruptcy threshold, towards a secured charge already on your home ( they can do it because they say so) and pretend to petition prior to the government raising the threshold. Although they will not bother serving any paperwork properly ( read about the process server) , just stitch you up in the same way as the secret family courts.

Recreate dodgy court orders and use old insolvency court documents, because no judges happened to be sitting that day.

Even though you have paid them, they will make out you have to tell them in advance or they can 'use your money' , just like they 'use your children' and steal them away, and they will petition to bankrupt you, just so they can steal your home in equally secret corrupt courts.

Expect about as much due process as you will get in the secret family courts ABSOULTELY NONE.

Brought and paid for corrupt judges work alongside the equally corrupt court and council staff , the land registry, official receiver are all part of the deception, none can be trusted.

ivanataylor left an annotation ()

Council Tax - Warning - Are You Expected To Be Mind Readers?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=EbPTagw9t0c

ivanataylor left an annotation ()

Council Tax -WARNING - Bankruptcy Petitions

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qdMEBs2c7sg

ivanataylor left an annotation ()

Council Tax - Is Your Councillor Useful or Useless?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=UFefpOtGhm0

ivanataylor left an annotation ()

Council Tax - Statutory Demand & Bankruptcy Petition Service

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ghy0DSlCuF8

ivanataylor left an annotation ()

Council Tax - Bankruptcy Prescribed Forms

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=cn3inNqlWvA

ivanataylor left an annotation ()

Council Tax - Statutory Set Aside Hearings - Appeals?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=v8D-Zx2vmZE

ivanataylor left an annotation ()

Council Tax - Bankruptcy Petition Hearing
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Fx9-C-QyfE8

ivanataylor left an annotation ()

Council Tax - Liability Orders - Full Council Question

Here is The Question I asked at our Full Council

" I wish to know whether or NOT a complaint is actually laid before a Magistrates' court prior to a summons being issued by the Magistrates' for non payment of Council Tax"?

They refused to minute the Question! Why?

Are we being 'Rail Roaded' and Stitched Up?

By unscrupulous Council and Court staff, while Elected Councillors turn a blind eye and just keep collecting their expenses and perks?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=HBBK1Gf4vmA

Deb Williams left an annotation ()

County Court at Maidstone - refusing court file to annul unlawful bankruptcy - DJ Susan Elizabeth Sullivan, DDJ Frank Winslett, DDJ Christopher Cagney
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/c...

Apparently it does not matter what a Judge does as long as they do not swear or fall asleep in court etc

Any complaint about how the judge manages or mis-manages a case to suit their decision and "agenda" is just ignored.

The Judiciary look after their own and the council it's called railroading for profit.