Disclosure and Barring Service employ a paedophile.

Response to this request is long overdue. By law, under all circumstances, Disclosure and Barring Service should have responded by now (details). You can complain by requesting an internal review.

Dear Disclosure and Barring Service,

It has come to me and associates attention that you employed Graeme Smith a paedophile for a few years.

1] Do your staff have in-house checks and how often are they followed up for criminal records?

2] Do you have discretion to employ anybody with a conviction ?

3] Does your public liability insurance cover man/women for criminal records and who is you public liability insurance company for 2017 ?

4] What is your postal address (not PO BOX Number) should we want to contact you in writing ?

5] Do DBS staff have enhanced disclosures ?

Kind regards,

peter danby and associates

Peter Danby left an annotation ()

Dear Disclosure and Barring Service,
Are you going to answer this FOI request ?

Regards,

peter danby and associates.

DBS FOI, Disclosure and Barring Service

1 Attachment

Dear Mr Danby

 

Please find enclosed our response to your request made in accordance with
the Freedom of Information Act.

 

I hope this information is of use to you.

 

Kind regards

 

 

 

D Dennett

Freedom of InformationTeam

Corporate Affairs Directorate

Disclosure and Barring Service

[1]www.gov.uk/dbs

 

 

References

Visible links
1. http://www.gov.uk/dbs

Dear D Dennett,

As your staff do not have follow up checks by Home Office to Baseline Personnel Security Standard, this is a conflict of interests..... Men/women who have DBS checks do not get this entitlement of in-house checks, why the discrepancy ?

Who is the responsible man/woman who considers employing men/women with criminal records for employment with the Disclosure and Barring Service (CRB) ?

As DBS does not have Public Liability Insurance, how are staff expected to make a claim if they have an accident?

Do you have indemnity insurance and contact details of the indemnity company please ?

Why do you not publicly disclose you lawful address to contact DBS, rather than a PO BOX Number ?

So as staff are base line checked, not enhanced checked, how can men/women have reassurance that you are not employing paedophiles like Graeme Smith in the near future ?

Kind regards,

peter danby and associates

DBS FOI, Disclosure and Barring Service

Dear Mr Danby

Thank you for your email.

The basis of an internal review is to dispute the original response issued based on the questions raised and for the DBS to ascertain if the original response provided to you was correct. However, as you are asking further questions which were not part of your original request we will treat this as a new request for you under reference FOI 1616. We will provide you with a further response within 20 working days.

Kind regards

Elise White
DBS Freedom of Information Manager

Dear Elise White,

This FOI request is long overdue by law and i require you to reply to this FOI request ASAP...!!

Regards,

peter danby and associates

Mail Delivery System,

2 Attachments

  • Attachment

    attachment.delivery status

    0K Download

  • Attachment

    Internal review of Freedom of Information request Disclosure and Barring Service employ a paedophile..txt

    1K Download View as HTML

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.

A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:

[DBS request email]
Unrouteable address

DBS FOI, Disclosure and Barring Service

1 Attachment

Dear Mr Danby

 

Please find attached our response to your Freedom of Information request
sent to the DBS.

 

Kind regards

 

Elise White

DBS Freedom of Information Officer

Dear Elise White,

1] As you are a so called public authority, why does Disclosure and Barring Service require commercial insurance?

2] You have also not given an address for lawful purposes, please can you supply it ?

3] A Po Box Number is not a contractual address, why does DBS use them ?

Kind regards,

peter danby and associates

DBS FOI, Disclosure and Barring Service

Dear Mr Danby

Thank you for your email below addressed to the Disclosure and Barring Service's Freedom of Information team.

I should inform you that your request does not meet the threshold for a Freedom of Information request. Section 8(1) of the Freedom of Information Act requires that a request for information must describe the information requested in a way that enables us to identify the information and assess whether or not we hold it. Your questions are asking for an opinion rather than recorded fact.

Therefore we will address your questions as enquiries and in order for us to do so, I should be grateful if you could clarify what you mean by an address for lawful purposes and a contractual address.

It would also be helpful if you could explain the significance of the question relating to commercial insurance; I am going to need to seek advice on that point so anything you can provide by way of context will help us to address this point.

Yours sincerely

D Dennett
Freedom of Information team
Disclosure and Barring Service
www.gov.uk/dbs

show quoted sections

Dear D Dennett,

I asked a specific question regarding question 1] As you are a so called public authority, why does Disclosure and Barring Service require commercial insurance? Can you please elaborate as to why you have commercial insurance, but cant answer the question ?

Question 2] of my FOI request asks why do you use a PO Box number, so your response is this is not recorded information ?

Question 3] asks why do you use a none contractual PO Box number, your reply is you do not have recorded information, but you do use a PO Box Number as a none contractual address, so surely this is recorded information ?

Kind regards,

peter danby & associates

DBS FOI, Disclosure and Barring Service

1 Attachment

Dear Mr Danby

 

Please see the enclosed response to your request for an internal review of
a Freedom of Information Request.

 

Kind regards

 

 

 

D Dennett

Freedom of Information Team

Corporate Affairs Directorate

Disclosure and Barring Service

[1]www.gov.uk/dbs

 

 

show quoted sections

References

Visible links
1. http://www.gov.uk/dbs

Dear D Dennett,

As staff at Disclosures and Barring Service found my question to contentious, i received a letter stating they do not want to speak to me on the phone, are you now wavering the ban ?

Robin Walker MP has confirmed to me that migrant workers cannot be thoroughly checked for criminal records from blitzed countries after some deliberation. As this is the case, DBS is a money making scam that does not check everybody working with vulnerable men/women or children, this is a disgrace and also disrespectful to the indigenous people who live in the UK".

The fact that DBS employed a paedophile just goes to show that anybody who has a clean criminal record can at anytime be a unscrupulous person and checks do not stop criminal activity taking place".

Kind regards,

peter danby & associates