Disasters Emergency Committee appeal for Gaza

The request was partially successful.

Dear Sir or Madam,

Please provide the minutes of meetings at which the BBC decided not to provide airtime for Disasters Emergency Committee appeal for Gaza.

Please provide notes of any communications the BBC has had with the government of Israel and Israeli lobbyists on this matter.

Please also note that "replies" which involve attachments in
proprietary file formats are not acceptable. A reply which is not in plain text format will be deemed to be a refusal to answer.

Yours faithfully,

David Hansen

FOI Enquiries, British Broadcasting Corporation

Dear Mr Hansen,

Thank you for your request for information under the Freedom of
Information Act 2000, about minutes from the decision to not broadcast the
DEC Appeal for Gaza. Also any communication that the BBC had with the
Israeli government and Israeli lobbyists. Your request was received on
23rd January, 2009. We will deal with your request as promptly as
possible, and at the latest within 20 working days. If you have any
queries about your request, please contact us at the address below.

The reference number for your request is RFI20090154.

Kind regards

The Information Policy & Compliance Team

BBC Freedom of Information
Room 2252, BBC White City
201 Wood Lane
London W12 7TS

[1]www.bbc.co.uk/foi
Email: [2][email address]

Tel: 020 8008 2882
Fax: 020 8008 2398

[3]http://www.bbc.co.uk
This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal
views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in
reliance on it and notify the sender immediately.
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to this.

References

Visible links
1. file://www.bbc.co.uk/foi
2. mailto:[email address]
3. http://www.bbc.co.uk/

FOI Enquiries, British Broadcasting Corporation

1 Attachment

Dear Mr Hansen,

Please find attached the BBC's response to your Freedom of Information Act
request regarding the DEC Gaza Appeal.

<<RFI20090154 - final response.pdf>>

Yours sincerely

Information Policy & Compliance

[1]http://www.bbc.co.uk
This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal
views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in
reliance on it and notify the sender immediately.
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to this.

References

Visible links
1. http://www.bbc.co.uk/

Dear Sir or Madam,

Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of Information reviews.

I am writing to request an internal review of British Broadcasting Corporation's handling of my FOI enquiry 'Disasters Emergency Committee appeal for Gaza'. You have failed to comply with the last paragraph of my enquiry.

A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is available on the Internet at this address:
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/di...

Yours sincerely,

David Hansen

FOI Enquiries, British Broadcasting Corporation

Dear Mr Hansen,

Thank you for your email regarding your request for an Internal Review
to your Freedom of Information Act request (RFI20090154).

As explained in our response dated 20 February 2009, where the Act does
not apply to the information held by the BBC in relation to your
request, we do not offer an Internal Review but suggest that if you do
not agree with our decision then you can raise the issue directly with
the Information Commissioner's Office. The contact details for the ICO
can also be found in our previous response.

Yours sincerely,

Information Policy and Compliance.

show quoted sections

Dear FOI Enquiries,

This "reply" demonstrates that the BBC is as arrogant as ever. As I explained I requested an internal review because the BBC had failed to comply with the last paragraph of my original enquiry. In your "reply" you completely ignore that and instead waffle on about something entirely different in an attempt to distract attention. I suggest that you read the last paragraph of my original enquiry before replying.

Yours sincerely,

David Hansen