Declaration of the nullity jurisdiction of Graham Rogers the alleged "official receiver"

Waiting for an internal review by Insolvency Rules Committee of their handling of this request.

Dear Insolvency Rules Committee,

FOIA Request seeking restitution and Justice

In the first instance, please could you furnish me with the Rules that your committee operates under, and advise if your remit has direct or indirect relevance to the summary provided at the foot of this email concerning two fraudulent bankruptcies which were made on 2/10/2017 by Graham Rogers, an alleged 'official receiver' from Reading?

Specifically, it would be very helpful to know if you can assist my husband and I with the grave injustice we've suffered at the hands of Insolvency Employee, GRAHAM ROGERS, an alleged "Official Receiver" who we submit has broken fundamental Rules within the Insolvency Act 1986 which have perverted the Course of Justice.

Mr Rogers has foisted himself upon us and turned our lives upside down, as instigated by criminal activity of two Eversheds solicitors in Cardiff (Timothy Pyle and latterly, richard Pitt, ably assisted by counsel Paul Mitchell), giving rise to a travesty of justice - without there being any Cause of Action or liquidated debt in existence.

This is being brought to your kind attention, because Graham Rogers has caused us immeasurable damage and harm without a Cause by acting on 2 wrongly made "bankruptcies" which were rubber-stamped in a corrupt County Court in Bournemouth where no due process has ever taken place nor been permitted:-

1. We submit that he’s conducted himself like a thief would do, who’s hiding behind an “Official” Title without any lawful appointment. We know this because no Cause of Action exists and there is no registered or liquidated debt - therefore he has no jurisdiction and no role in Law. But he has not addressed this.

2. He’s frozen our bank accounts and emptied them without any debt in existence. He's also frozen credit cards without having to undergo or do any form of compliance whatsoever! How is this allowed, given we have rights in Law? How is one supposed to manage with no bank account? His actions are entirely vexatious and predicated on the assumption of mere HEARSAY that there is a "debt" without any checks being done to view a debt or inspect any forensic evidence of a debt - no such evidence exists nor has any evidence been adduced to any paperwork. It is an affront.

3. He’s blackballed our names to Land Registry to mislead them into putting lawless restrictions on our Register, and in turn Land Registry have mis-spelt his name which causes us to question whether it is even the same person or just another layer of complex frauds which have beset my husband and I over our estate spanning the past 24.5 years - in particular, he's even ignored that our house is in Trust for our daughter since april 1997, a record of a RESTRICTION for which was added to the Land Registry's Register in July 2012.

This unconsciable act, in turn, has resulted in us being bombarded with a long string of invasive emails from individuals at Land Registry's Plymouth office with threats of applying restrictions and discrediting our objectings outright, mindless and Draconian behaviour which is highly distressing - compounding the problem of the bogus 'bankruptcies' being given credence where no basis for them exists and where no single Government employee has had the intelligence or common sense to do even the most cursory check to see if there is a registered or liquidated debt!

4. The wrongly made 'Bankruptcy orders" are based on an alleged "judgment debt' yet no record of any such debt exists with the Ministry of Justice's statutory record -keepers at THE REGISTRY TRUST - where their Manager, Veronica Foster, confirmed in writing twice that there is "no record of any judgment debt under Claim 8PC26793" nor any other claim.
So, in addition to the foregoing, Mr Rogers has got NO JURISDICTION because no Cause of action exists and no judgment debt exists to base it upon - indeed, no claim has ever been issued in the Court, nor has any petition or paperwork ever been served from the Court! (only from Eversheds, which is illegal).

5. He’s siding and colluding with Richard Pitt of Eversheds Cardiff office, in a clear CONSPIRACY and brazen attempt to divest us of our home. He's done absolutely NO checks or investigation into the matter as he is required to do under the Insolvency Act 1986 Section 289.

6. He’s taken more than 11 weeks to finally break his illegal silence after his non-appointment based solely on assumptions being wrongly made with NO COMPLIANCE with Law. He wrote to me 3rd week of December 2017 to seize upon a complaint lodged that he was acting in tort - evidently eager to push us into a mindless 'complaints procedure' which we have no faith in, either.

7. He’s caused huge damage to our reputation through getting the unconstitutional Govt Gazette to publish the bald faced LIE that we are bankrupt when we’re not, causing gross humiliation and injury to our names and displaying our home address to all and sundry - a degrading act of injustice and blatant disregard for our rights in Law, which is defamatory and slanderous in the extreme.

8. He’s evidently so professionally incompetent that he’s even ignored that there’s NO NAMED CREDITOR on the void “orders”! How can a bankruptcy have no beneficiary?
What kind of official receiver is he? We regard his behaviour as entirely inappropriate, and suspicious.

9. He’s shown gross negligence by failing to address that there’s no Cause of Action nor any aggrieved party except us!

10. He’s turned an illegal brazen blind eye to the fact nothing has been served on me or my husband from the Court - including the petition!.

11. He has also ignored that we've explained my husband has not lived or worked in the UK since June 2010, preferring to side step such critical issues which the IA 86 clearly states prevent any Bankruptcy order from being made in such relevant circumstances.

12. He's defiantly added gross insult to gross injury by condoning the fact that no fair hearing was permitted and not only did the fake judge disallow me to show (or even bring) my evidence in, but he also forced me to leave the room - which was not a court but a private chamber. It was all completely rigged, with a female barrister (Nicola Campbell-Clause from Hailsham Chambers) sitting with Deputy District Judge Dixon for 45 minutes to an hour BEFORE the session began, and remaining in the Chambers for nearly an hour after I was forced and intimidated to leave. He did this because I said it was contempt of court to deny me a fair trial or hearing and to disallow any examination of my evidence.

13. He’s turned a Nelsonian blind eye to the fact that no registered or liquidated debt exists. And instead has been aiding and abetting Richard pitts shameless criminality and conspiracy to steal - once again, through a private Chamber NOT a court! The private capacity the judge was working in was not even disclosed.

14. He knows that all the above resulted in two void orders being vexatiously drawn up without any lawful basis or forensic proof - which is criminal and a direct breach of Section 135 of the County Court act ,carrying 7 years in prison - for purporting a court order to have been made with the authority of the court, when no such authority exists.

We know this because there’s NO issued or sealed claim, confirmed in writing by the court
And No service
Any claim was statute barred as the cut off date was 2013 to issue
No extension of time was ever applied for, as required under CPR 7.5
So the possession claim never actually began - yet has been falsely used to purportedly 'underpin' the fake 'bankruptcies'.

15. The nullity county court proceedings deceived us for 9 long years - Engineered to reverse our position of being the rightful CLAIMANTS to being mis-labelled DEFENDANTS and having our High court claim against the SAME BANK derailed and our roles, thus reversed - all through Eversheds and Mitchell’s skulduggery and abuse of the court process.

16. He’s relying on a shadow court (private, not Public,) Chambers
Which is unlawful

17. HE CLAIMS TO HAVE BEEN APPOINTED BY THE COURT !
(How can a private Chambers be a legitimate appointee?)

And High court of Appeal case Law says a private hearing must be overturned

Plainly, he has, and continues, to pervert the Course of Justice and appears to be adopting a stance of 'wilful blindness' and using blanket denial to (weakly) try to cover his tracks. This is the ultimate abuse of position, which itself is a serious offence under the Fraud Act 2006.

Your early response would be appreciated -

Yours truly
Elizabeth watson

Here is the summary of our situation, as notified to the Ministry of Justice today:

23 December 2017

Dear Cox, Christopher,

Important Notice re. our important FOIA request about the MOJ's record-keeping on data concerning us

I'm ever so sorry that you’ve taken my communication the wrong way, there's obviously some kind of a misunderstanding here, I believe. I've now taken advice, and now realise that I didn't understand your processes and so must apologise if my previous letter was a bit scattergun or just wasn’t sufficiently focused.

However, I will say that it appears that your letter to me sent 2 days ago is the same letter you sent to me a month earlier, being one which you appear to have used with other victims of similar situations as we find ourselves facing, involving court order scams and much more beyond this. We find this a bit worrying, to be fair.
Please be assured, nevertheless, that there are no ill intentions from our side, and indeed there is a specific purpose and reason for the FOIA requests I have made, which I've endeavoured to pinpoint in the numbered paragraphs below:-

(1) Please be advised that my husband and I have been relentlessly pursued through HMCTS for nearly a decade by evidently highly dishonest solicitors (Richard Pitt of Eversheds Cardiff office and David Webb of M&M Law/Matthew & Matthew), who have been trying to divest us of our family home which I paid cash for back in December 1993, on a basis that it now emerges is entirely spurious and involves attempted money-laundering on a very serious scale.

Due to the manipulation of the Court process and various abuses therein by involved court officers, we've ended up having our validly issued (with a £1,600 fee we paid) High Court Claim against HBOS PLC, derailed in 2010 without any hearing or trial, not even a defence was issued, and because of that our positions were dishonestly reversed - turning us from being the rightful CLAIMANTS into being the purported "defendants" to the Bank concerned, thanks to the twists and turns of barrister Paul Mitchell from Hailsham Chambers (who rose to QC status following his serious misdemeanours) colluding with Eversheds Partners Tim Pyle and latterly Richard Pitt.
We now know that HBOS PLC had their name used but have evidence to show that the real protagonist is a clone version of it which has operated ultra vires and off ledger using fake Bank accounts under the trading name of "In Parallel Solutions" through the Lloyds Private Banking Unit in Manchester. The evidence suggests that a 'shadow bank' has contracted with a 'shadow court' to launder substantial sums of money and to attempt to divest us of our home and property rights without a shred of forensic proof.

They appear to have been motivated and driven to conceal an illegal draw down which had been made on our property by Fraser Mackay the ex-Head Auditor of HBOS PLC, which was used to bribe a US official in November 2001 when his boiler house scheme began to collapse.
We now know that it was because all client moneys which he'd been illegally pooling in offshore accounts got frozen by the US Authorities on 19/11/2001, and he wanted to find a way to reverse the freezing order so he executed a draw down on our house without our authority and a 17 year cover-up has continued for all this time - to protect Lloyds Banking Group and conceal the frauds and thefts they are committing using false instruments against innocent people like ourselves.

The fact we have never received a penny from any bank did not seem to enter in to it, in their eyes.
We now know they securitised moneys against our Estate without updating the register at Land Registry, where they used David Webb to enter an unauthorised charge against our Register on a void deed he'd created without our knowledge, which used our forged signatures, and have withheld all disclosure from us for 17 years.

(2) Due to the 17 year criminal cover up, the truth has been concealed from us until we delved into the records.

We are bewildered that it appears you may believe that under the FOIA that our personal information is something we are not entitled to access. We do not understand why this is and so ask you to kindly reconsider things in light of the further explanations provided here, please.

Its just that I was advised in writing by your Manager of the Statutory Records department at the MOJ (Veronica foster) that there is no record of any 'judgment debt' against our names under "8PC26793", upon which the Bankruptcy orders referred to as "055 and 056 of 2017" solely rely.
We are not bankrupt and are not insolvent and we have never incurred any debts.

So naturally, we wanted to check this with the Ministry of Justice as to why we have been bankrupted on 2/10/17 (without any petition or paperwork ever being served to us from the Court), and to find out why we have Richard Pitt of Eversheds LLP Cardiff snapping at our heels to try to ruin our lives with the ongoing harassment and vexatious unsubstantiated allegations that we are "debtors" when there is no sustainable evidence that any legal mortgage exists, nor is there any mortgage contract or transfer that's ever taken place.
We understand that the FCA introduced new rules in March 2016 and reinforced this in March 2017 for individual accountability by Banks - but far from there being any such accountability by the BOS or Eversheds or their agents, we've been told by the BOS there is NO DRAW DOWN and NO SOLICITORS INSTRUCTED and NO RECORD OF THE BANK ACCOUNTS THAT WERE USED to route things through!
We've clearly suffered identity theft on top of everything else, and so would like to enlist your assistance to access a legal remedy here, in the interests of natural Justice.

(3) Veronica Foster's letter of 11 December 2017 confirms an earlier email she had helpfully sent to me stating there is no record of any 'judgment debt' under "8PC26793", confirming no such record exists, viz:

"Dear Mr & Mrs Watson
County Court judgment - Case number: 8PC26793
Please see attached my email dated 15 November 2017 which confirms registry Trust Ltd having no record of the above judgment.
Yours sincerely
V.Foster (Mrs)
customer Services Manager"

Therefore, it stands to reason that it is clearly impossible for two "Bankruptcy orders" to have been lawfully made on the back of a non-existent "judgment debt", particularly where there has never been any due process of Law nor disclosure of any supporting evidence.

(4) This is especially upsetting because it denotes my husband and I have had our lives turned upside down and unimaginable distress caused because we have been deceived into attending Court for over 9 years on what turns out to be a huge lie and a hoax. This has taken an extremely heavy toll on our stress levels, health, happiness, finances, right to Family life and much much more, as you can imagine.

(5) I was also told in July 2015 by the Bournemouth County Court that no electronic records exist of Case "8PC26793" on the HMCTS System, and a staff member there (Mrs Sadie) revealed that they "have no record of any possession order against our property" - so the inverse evidence is at least congruent with the facts.

This appears to be entirely consistent with the fact that no Possession claim has ever been issued or sealed by the Bournemouth County court, nor received by us from them - even confirmed by the Court in writing back in September 2014.

We have issued and hand-delivered to the Court counter, 3 Statutory Constructive Notices to the Bournemouth County Court since 30 October 2017 seeking disclosure of information to confirm if such a record exists on the Court record as "055 & 056 of 2017" and "8PC26793", but there has been no response whatsoever. This is another reason we are forced to refer to the MOJ, as you can hopefully begin to appreciate we have been severely wronged.

Yet, unimaginable harassment has been allowed to continue for all these years because of the criminal activity of certain Court officers (in particular, Eversheds solicitors) who have evidently been deploying a faction operating within the Court to assist Eversheds and David Webb to conspire against us, which has permitted Justice to continue being perverted to our huge cost and detriment. They have aided and abetted compound torts to be imposed upon us, continually denied us all access to evidence or any Cause of Action or enforceable contract or mortgage, and blocked all disclosure which is against our Human Rights and the natural Rule of Law.

(6) Upon realising that the 'kangaroo hearing' which led to the purported 'order for possession' made by an evidently complicit judge (Martin Alan Gordon Dancey) on 1/7/2015 in our absence was done in a private capacity for private pecuniary advantage involving serial torts and frauds, and was unenforceable in Law because no registered debt exists, they decided to try to 'bankrupt' us instead, using a private chamber (also unlawful), with no due process of Law whatsoever, no evidence of a debt provided, no named creditor on the void 'orders' of 2/10/2017 - so they went through the motions of it without there being any substance to it.
We now know there is Case Law from the Court of Appeal which renders any hearing conducted in a private Chambers as unlawful and must therefore be overturned.

(7) The judge’s conduct at the unnotified '2 day possession trial' (discovered by me by accident from an email exchanged with Mr Pitt) was fraudulent and had grave conflicts of interest, such as the fact he relied upon a business partner (David Ross Webb of Matthew & Matthew solicitors at 194 Seabourne Road, southbourne, Bournemouth) as a "witness" to Eversheds, when it is evident now that David Webb (and not the Bank of Scotland PLC, after all) is the instructing party to Eversheds.

Mr Webb would be highly motivated, it appears, to acquire our property and clean up the toxic records because of the substantial sum of equity he has stripped from our Estate over the past 24.5 years which exceeds 7 figures. He appears to be the beneficiary of 7 mortgages he has drawn on our Estate and has left us with a legacy of 2 false 'charges' on the Register at LR predicated on our forged signatures.

(8) I have even recently unearthed documentary evidence that indicates that a conduit and accomplice for David Webb appears to be a POLICE constable from Dorset Police, the latter is a party who has also applied for 2 of the 7 loans and even a vodafone account in 2015 using our home address as if it is his address, using our asset and details for private pecuniary gain without our authorisation. This, in turn, goes a long way to explaining why Dorset Police have blocked all investigation in to our problems for over 12 years now.

(9) We have further found out that David Webb was the solicitor to the vendor of our house, and he acted without any POA or instruction against our property and family home dating right back to December 1993, when he orchestrated a Leasehold rather than a Freehold, taking advantage that I wasn’t well at the time. He used a fraudulent Title number, however, and purported to pay stamp duty on it which of course would have meant that no stamp duty was paid in the end as LR admitted the Title is invalid.
The solicitor that we had instructed (David Monk of Bennett Thomas) worked with Mr Webb in the background and later became his employee, we now know. Mr Monk has now vanished and seems untraceable since about 2013, along with the vendor of our property, Mr Baynham.

(10) Consequently were in touch with Land Registry with the aim of seeking to get it all rectified and to claim back our Freehold Title, only to discover (throughout 2016) that Mr Webb had raised and misappropriated substantial funds against our names which is Identity fraud and unlawful asset stripping (see details above).

(11) I hope that this helps to explain why the FOIA information about the records of the cases through which all these events have been routed is critical information that we now need: as we can’t conclude anything until your office concludes the investigation and provides us with our relevant personal data.

(12) We give you our sincere assurance that we are not trying to be annoying, merely to save our home and access Justice which we are clearly entitled to do and must be permitted to do.
We feel exhausted by the attrition we've encountered in seeking access to Justice which we believe is a right and not a privilege, and so we naturally hope and pray that there will be no more obstacles put in our way. Your understanding would therefore be much appreciated.

(13) We have observed that neither the void 'possession order' created by District judge Dancey nor the void 'bankruptcy orders' rubber-stamped by Deputy District Judge Dixon had any due process of Law, nor any valid service.
These two judges did not follow the court rules, ignored there was no valid service, ignored that nothing had ever been issued with the Court, ignored that no disclosure of any Cause of action had been provided on either count, and both were demonstrably working to an undisclosed agenda, both it appears were dishonest and were colluding with their business associates from Eversheds and Messrs Webb and his conduit, David Monk - to our direct detriment. This has desecrated our confidence and trust in British Courts based on our experience of them, as you can hopefully appreciate.

(14) Specifically, our main contention now is that my husband and I have been bankrupted on a lie: of an alleged judgment debt that does not exist, can not be proven, and which we did not incur. And that we appear to be being prevented from accessing restitution to the foregoing kafkaesque nightmare we've had to endure for over 24 years now.

We require our position to be fully restored, the substantial stolen funds returned to us, and the false charges removed from the Register, particularly as we are now approaching retirement age and want our lives back. We trust that this message provides a proportionate perspective to our request and the importance of it.

Please could explain to me how all of the above events have been allowed to happen, given the Ministry of Justice records on the above cases are 'in absentia'?

Yours sincerely,
Liz Watson (on behalf of Liz & craig watson)

Dear Elizabeth Watson

We acknowledge your request made on 23 December 2017 under the Freedom of Information Act (FOI) 2000.

The FOI Act gives certain rights to members of the public to access information held by public authorities. The FoI Act also encourages public authorities to proactively make information available to members of the public (except where exemptions apply) and respond to requests within 20working days.

We will therefore respond not later than 25 January 2018 in line with the FOI Act process.

Regards

Lolu

show quoted sections

1 Attachment

Dear Elizabeth Watson

Please find attached response to your request made under the Freedom of Information Act 2000.

Regards

Lolu

Lolu Adeniji| Data Protection & Freedom of Information Officer | External Relations|The Insolvency Service-Delivering economic confidence|
[email address]| 4 Abbey Orchard Street, London, SW1P 2HT |Tel:  0207 637 6319| www.gov.uk/insolvency-service|
Please consider the environment before printing

show quoted sections

Dear FOI,

EXEMPT INFORMATION? What do you mean "exempt information" ?
Please explain yourselves under our rights in Common Law, and our Human Rights.

How can you hide behind this lie to conceal compound frauds and ORGANISED CRIME by the insolent Insolvency dis-service?

this is an abomination and is wholly unacceptable. This will be made fully Public in the mainstream Media if you do not act with probity and remove the monstrous lie of these bogus "bankruptcies" from my husband and I - you are like a gang of pirates who are fleecing innocent people based on lies with NO PROOF.

Are you crazy? Your time is running out. We will consider joining all of those who are aiding and abetting these frauds to a private criminal prosecution (or a Public one) - these attempted thefts are brazen adn an affront, and have to stop!

Yours sincerely,

Liz Watson