Debtor or Creditor Birth Certificate.

Waiting for an internal review by General Register Office of their handling of this request.

Dear General Register Office,

On registration of Birth is it true that you are recorded as a debtor and issued a birth certificate that confirms this status.
Is it true that their is an other option that is not disclosed or discussed at the point of registration, The Creditor Birth Certificate.
Is it true that one must make their living status known by attaching a ecclesiastical deed poll to the back of their debtor birth certificate in order to prove there existence and status.
Please can you provide me a detailed explanation of said creditors birth certificate and also include details on how Creditor certificate can be obtained, issued and how the debtor birth certificate can be dissolved.

Yours faithfully,

Stuart-leslie

FOI, General Register Office

If your enquiry falls within the remit of a Freedom of Information request
Her Majesty’s Passport Office will send you an acknowledgement within the
next 2 working days.

 

If your enquiry does not fall within the Freedom of Information remit this
will not be forwarded or responded to. Therefore please contact the
appropriate department listed below:

 

• For a passport enquiry or complaint, please complete an online enquiry
form

 

• If your enquiry or complaint relates to a certificate which you have
ordered from the General Registrar’s Office, please complete the
certificate service order enquiries form.

 

• If your request is for information relating to your data held by Her
Majesty’s Passport Office or an individual it falls under the terms of the
Data Protection Act 1998 and may qualify as a Subject Access Request,
please email [email address]

 

• If your enquiry relates to nationality you should forward your enquiry
to the UK Visas and Immigration enquiry team who are better placed to
respond, please email    [email address

 

 

show quoted sections

GRO Policy,

Dear Stuart-Leslie,

Thank you for your email of 25 January to the General Register Office (GRO) regarding the registration of births and issuing of birth certificates.

Your request has been handled as official correspondence rather than as a request for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000, although this does not mean that your enquiry has been actioned any differently or that the information provided contains any less content or detail.

It may be helpful if I explain that the GRO is responsible for matters regarding civil registration such as Births, Deaths Civil Partnerships and Marriages.

When a birth is registered, it is simply a record of the event as it happened at the time. On registration of a birth, you are not recorded as a debtor or creditor, nor does the issue of the birth certificate mean an individual is considered as such. The document you refer to as "The Creditor Birth Certificate" does not exist and is not an option as part of a birth registration.

When a birth takes place, a notification is created by the National Health Service (NHS), this informs the local registration service that a child has been born in their district. The registrar uses this listing to check that a birth has occurred and that it took place within their district before commencing with the registration. Individuals are not required to make their living status known or otherwise prove their existence when registering a birth.

The registration of a birth and the issuing of a birth certificate is a legislative requirement under The Births and Deaths Registration Act 1953. There are no provisions in the law for a birth registration or the resultant certificate to be dissolved.

Kind regards,
Kayleigh

Kayleigh Roberts
Senior Policy Advisor
Civil Registration Directorate

show quoted sections

Dear GRO Policy,
Thank you for your reply,
Please can you you address the last question,
Is it true that one must make their living status known by attaching a ecclesiastical deed poll to the back of their [debtor] birth certificate in order to prove there existence and status. as detailed in Canonum De Lus Positivum (Canon Law) and Cestui Que Vie act 1666?
I would also like to ask what is the purpose of canon 2057 and Cestui Que Vie Act have to do with Birth Certificates?

Canon 1481
As these canons of Divine Law, Natural Law, Cognitive Law and Positive Law comprehensively prove
Divine Law, Natural Law and Positive Law, they stand as the highest proof of law against any other
claims of inferior law.
Canon 1482: The denial of valid proof is error in law. Therefore, any denial of the superior proof of these canons is automatically an error in law.
Canon 1483: Any claim that the law admits no proof against that which it presumes is false.
Canon 1484: A Proof will stand good until the contrary is proved. Therefore in the absence of any challenge by valid Proof equal or greater than these canons, all men, women and persons consent to these canons being the one, true and only rule of law.
Canon 1485: When anyone references, writes or ces, writes or speaks of “Proof”, “Real Proof”, or “Complete Proof” it shall mean these canons and no other.
Canon 2036: A Cestui Que Vie Trust, also known later as a "Fide Commissary Trust" and later again as a “Foreign Situs trust” and also known as a form of “Secret Trust ”is a fictional concept being a Temporary Testamentary Trust, first created during the reign of Henry VIII of England through the Cestui Que Vie Act of 1540 and updated by Charles II through the Cestui Que Vie Act of 1666 wherein an Estate may be effected for the Benefit of one or more Persons presumed lost or abandoned at “sea” and
therefore assumed/presumed “dead” after seven (7) years. Additional presumptions by which such a
Trust may be formed were added in later statutes to include bankrupts, minors, incompetents,
mortgages and private companies.
Canon 2057 - Any Administrator or Executor that refuses to immediately dissolve a Cestui Que (Vie) Trust, upon a Person establishing their status and competency, is guilty of fraud and fundamental breach of their fiduciary duties requiring their immediate removal and punishment.

Cestui Que Vie Act 1666:

Cestui que vie remaining beyond Sea for Seven Years together and no Proof of their Lives, Judge in Action to direct a Verdict as though Cestui que vie were dead.
If such person or persons for whose life or lives such Estates have beene or shall be granted as aforesaid shall remaine beyond the Seas or elsewhere absent themselves in this Realme by the space of seamen yeares together and noe sufficient and evident proofe be made of the lives of such person or persons respectively in any Action commenced for recovery of such Tenements by the Lessors or Reversioners in every such case the person or persons upon whose life or lives such Estate depended shall be accounted as naturally dead, And in every Action brought for the recovery of the said Tenements by the Lessors or Reversioners their Heires or Assignes, the Judges before whom such Action shall be brought shall direct the Jury to give their Verdict as if the person soe remaining beyond the Seas or otherwise absenting himselfe were dead.

Yours sincerely,

Stuart-leslie

GRO Policy,

Dear Stuart-Leslie,

Thank you for your email.

In our previous response, we advised that individuals are not required to make their living status known. This includes in the circumstances you detail below.

Birth Certificates are issued as a legislative requirement under The Births and Deaths Registration Act 1953 and are not linked in any way to either Canon 2057 or the Cestui Que Vie Act.

Kind regards,
Kayleigh

Kayleigh Roberts

Senior Policy Advisor

Civil Registration Directorate

show quoted sections

Dear GRO Policy,

Thank you for your reply.

"Birth Certificates are issued as a legislative requirement Birth Certificates are issued as a legislative requirement under The Births and Deaths Registration Act 1953 and are not linked in any way to either Canon 2057 or the Cestui Que Vie Act.

Upon the birth certificate being created under The Births and Deaths Registration Act 1953, Who has access to the information detailed within the certificate.

Who has access to the unique number issues on a birth certificate.

May I also ask to why the certificate is issued even though it is grammatically incorrect. By the way of it not being typed/printed using syntax grammar?
why is it printed in a Italic/GLOSSA font also named : DOG-LATIN . as grammatical fact stating that such a NAME written in DOG-LATIN-GLOSSA style in any of your documents are Corrupt and Criminal,

Could you also explain why a Name appearing in all-capital lettering representing “Capitis diminutio maxima“ the lowering of one’s legal status into that of a slave. Ex

thus leading back to "legislative requirement- canon law 2057 and the Cestui qui vie act 1666". Where you must prove you are a living being not a "PERSON" . in order to not be considered in the eyes of the Law and Government as a "slave, imbecilic child, serf and many more Legalise terms used to hide the fact.
"Person"
In general usage, a human being; by statute, however, the term can include firms, labour organizations, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in Bankruptcy, or receivers.
A corporation is a "person" for purposes of the constitutional guarantees of equal protection of laws and Due Process of Law". BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY.

Yours sincerely

Stuart-leslie

GRO Policy,

Dear Stuart-Leslie,

Thank you for your email of 10 February.

The birth of a child that occurs in England and Wales must be registered in accordance with the Births and Deaths Registration Act 1953. The information is given to the registrar by a qualified informant, usually the father and mother of the child. The law requires a registrar to provide the superintendent registrar with a certified copy of all entries of births which have been registered. The superintendent registrar is required to provide the Registrar General with all certified copies of entries in the registers of births.

Every superintendent registrar is required to keep an index of all the registers of births held in the register office and any person is entitled to search the indexes and to have a certified copy of any entry (Certificate).

The Registrar General is also required to keep an index of all the certified copies of entries in the registers and any person is entitled to search the indexes and to have a certified copy (Certificate).

The serial number which appears on a certificate is unique and relates only that particular certificate.

The use of upper-case or capital letters in a birth registration is simply to denote the difference between forename(s) and the surname of the individual and enables effective indexing of the record.

Finally, it may be helpful to remind you that GRO is only responsible for matters regarding civil registration in England and Wales, as your correspondence extends beyond those matters, I am unable to comment any further.

Kind regards,
Kayleigh

Kayleigh Roberts
Senior Policy Advisor
Civil Registration Directorate

show quoted sections

Dear GRO Policy,

Thank you for your reply [18th February 2021 ].

may I ask for clarification for the following points:

1). What Law does the registration of Birth relate to exactly? "The law requires a registrar to provide the superintendent registrar with a certified copy of all entries of births which have been registered."

"Births and Deaths Registration Act 1953".

[ As Act(s) , statutes and legislation(s) are not Law.
As the act you are referred to is an Act of HM Parliament and Government PLC, a recognised Unlimited Corporation or an all for profit business, or policy, but it is not a law.
Acts and statutes of HM Parliament and Government PLC, can only be given by force of law, by the consent of the governed. By those who have agreed to Acts and Statutes of HM Parliament and Government PLC. Therefore a mandatory legal requirement under current legislation that the GOVERNED must have given their CONSENT legally, which can be physically presented as FACT before the acts and statutes of HM Parliament and Government PLC can be given force of law].

2).Can you 'General Register Office, provide stuart-leslie, with documented evidence that my INFROMENTS (Parents) were informed, given full disclosure, that they must consent in order for the Act of Registration to have the force of law Not Law, Not Enforceable.?

3). Can you 'General Register Office, provide stuart-leslie, provide stuart-leslie, evidence of payment for the certificate from my Informants (parents)? Full discloser: Bill, invoice, demand for payment.
[ a demand for payment without a signed bill is a direct contravention of the bill of Exchange Act 1882. The Bills of Exchange Act is based upon a pre existing commercial contract or agreement ].

4). Can you 'General Register Office, provide stuart-leslie with all document(s) relating to the creation of my certificate BCF******, that must be kept legally on file.
[ Register Office, has no recognisable legal means to demand a payment without a signed bill. which is based on pre existing commercial contract or arrangement or agreement. simply because; no standing commercial contract or arrangement or agreement exists between : Register Office and Informant's ].

5). can you 'General Register Office, provide stuart-leslie with the details of his Informants (parents ) as I need to ask them if they had full disclosure in regards to payment of my certificate.
[ as if my informants was to willingly to comply with the demand for payment without a commercially recognised bill, then my informants would have knowingly given consent and conspired to a commercially fraudulent action. This would make my informants culpable under current legislation for that action. I believe that my Informants would not knowingly create liability against themselves or create culpability].

6). Can you General Register Office provide stuart-leslie with details of how many Birth certificate's have been Issued/created, this is to include all the unique certificate number.

7). Can you General Register Office officially confirm, that the serial number which appears on a certificate is unique and relates only that particular certificate.

8 ) Can you General Register Office officially confirm, that the serial number which appears on a certificate is unique and relates only that particular certificate. Do this also include the person? is the number unique to the person?
9). Can you General Register Office officially confirm, that the serial number which appears on a certificate is unique and relates only that particular certificate, and that is not and can not be used for financial gain by HM Parliament and Government PLC.

10). Can you General Register Office officially confirm, that The use of upper-case or capital letters in a birth registration is simply to denote the difference between forename(s) and the surname of the individual and enables effective indexing of the record, and is not the debased language GLOSSA .

Finally, it may be helpful to remind you that The 7 Principals of Public Life issued on 31st May 1995 applies to GRO.
GRO is responsible for matters regarding civil registration in England and Wales, my enquires are valid.

NOTES:
Something to ponder upon.
Complicity ,Deliberate deception, ignorance of current legislation, display of lack of understanding and competence regarding what is the difference between law and legislation, Bills of Exchange Act 1882, profiteering through deception, racketeering, extortion, malfeasance and Fraud.

Yours sincerely,

Stuart-leslie

GRO Policy,

Dear Stuart-Leslie,

Thank you for your email of 27 February.

Please see responses to your questions below.

Kind regards,
Kayleigh

Kayleigh Roberts
Senior Policy Advisor
Civil Registration Directorate

1). What Law does the registration of Birth relate to exactly? "The law requires a registrar to provide the superintendent registrar with a certified copy of all entries of births which have been registered."

"Births and Deaths Registration Act 1953".

[ As Act(s) , statutes and legislation(s) are not Law.
As the act you are referred to is an Act of HM Parliament and Government PLC, a recognised Unlimited Corporation or an all for profit business, or policy, but it is not a law.
Acts and statutes of HM Parliament and Government PLC, can only be given by force of law, by the consent of the governed. By those who have agreed to Acts and Statutes of HM Parliament and Government PLC. Therefore a mandatory legal requirement under current legislation that the GOVERNED must have given their CONSENT legally, which can be physically presented as FACT before the acts and statutes of HM Parliament and Government PLC can be given force of law].

As previously stated, the requirements for a birth registration and the particulars surrounding the registration are set out in The Births and Deaths Registration Act 1953 and The Registration of Births and Deaths Regulation 1987.

2).Can you 'General Register Office, provide stuart-leslie, with documented evidence that my INFROMENTS (Parents) were informed, given full disclosure, that they must consent in order for the Act of Registration to have the force of law Not Law, Not Enforceable.?

The General Register Office are unable to provide you with the information you request.

Registrars are not required to obtain consent from informants regarding Acts or Regulations.

3). Can you 'General Register Office, provide stuart-leslie, provide stuart-leslie, evidence of payment for the certificate from my Informants (parents)? Full discloser: Bill, invoice, demand for payment.
[ a demand for payment without a signed bill is a direct contravention of the bill of Exchange Act 1882. The Bills of Exchange Act is based upon a pre existing commercial contract or agreement ].

The General Register Office are unable to provide you with the information you request.

4). Can you 'General Register Office, provide stuart-leslie with all document(s) relating to the creation of my certificate BCF******, that must be kept legally on file.
[ Register Office, has no recognisable legal means to demand a payment without a signed bill. which is based on pre existing commercial contract or arrangement or agreement. simply because; no standing commercial contract or arrangement or agreement exists between : Register Office and Informant's ].

The General Register Office do not hold the information you request.

5). can you 'General Register Office, provide stuart-leslie with the details of his Informants (parents ) as I need to ask them if they had full disclosure in regards to payment of my certificate.
[ as if my informants was to willingly to comply with the demand for payment without a commercially recognised bill, then my informants would have knowingly given consent and conspired to a commercially fraudulent action. This would make my informants culpable under current legislation for that action. I believe that my Informants would not knowingly create liability against themselves or create culpability].

The General Register Office cannot provide you with the information you request. The information you request is already available in the form of a certificate upon payment of the statutory fee and provision of the correct identifying information.

If you wish to apply for a copy of any record, further guidance can be found at https://www.gov.uk/order-copy-birth-deat....

6). Can you General Register Office provide stuart-leslie with details of how many Birth certificate's have been Issued/created, this is to include all the unique certificate number.

This information is not held.

7). Can you General Register Office officially confirm, that the serial number which appears on a certificate is unique and relates only that particular certificate.

As stated in previous correspondence, the serial number contained on a certificate for any entry is simply a number which relates to that particular certificate only.

8 ) Can you General Register Office officially confirm, that the serial number which appears on a certificate is unique and relates only that particular certificate. Do this also include the person? is the number unique to the person?

As stated in previous correspondence, the serial number contained on a certificate for any entry is unique to that particular certificate and nothing more. The number does not relate to any person.

9). Can you General Register Office officially confirm, that the serial number which appears on a certificate is unique and relates only that particular certificate, and that is not and can not be used for financial gain by HM Parliament and Government PLC.

As stated in previous correspondence, the serial number contained on a certificate for any entry is simply a number which relates to that particular certificate and nothing more. These numbers are not used for any financial gain in any way.

10). Can you General Register Office officially confirm, that The use of upper-case or capital letters in a birth registration is simply to denote the difference between forename(s) and the surname of the individual and enables effective indexing of the record, and is not the debased language GLOSSA .

As stated in previous correspondence, the use of capital letters serves no additional purpose other than to simply to denote the difference between forename(s) and surname of an individual for the purposes of indexing of the record.

show quoted sections

Dear GRO Policy,
To: Kayleigh Roberts, who is the individual who accepts liability for the Name Kayleigh Roberts, acting as Senior Policy Advisor, Civil Registration Directorate
Stuart-leslie :Dalton requires an sworn affidavit statement of truth from Kayleigh Roberts in regards to the points below.

1. Stuart-leslie :Dalton requires evidence in substance the Act(s), The Births and Deaths Registration Act 1953 and The Registration of Births and Deaths Regulation 1987, are in FACT law.
Stuart-leslie :Dalton say’s: Acts and statutes of HM Parliament and Government PLC, can only be given by force of law, by the consent of the governed. By those who have agreed to Acts and Statutes of HM Parliament and Government PLC. Therefore a mandatory legal requirement under current legislation that the GOVERNED must have given their CONSENT legally, which can be physically presented as FACT before the acts and statutes of HM Parliament and Government PLC can be given force of law]. Stuart-leslie :Dalton requires to rebut this point.

2. Stuart-leslie : requires evidence in substance why the registrars are not required by Law to disclose, Act(s), Statutes and Legislation require consent from the governed to have force of Law.
Stuart-leslie : say’s, this is concealment of facts, stuart-leslie requires you Kayleigh Roberts to rebut this point.

3. Stuart-leslie requires evidence in substance why the General Register Office and or Local Register Office by law are not required to keep evidence of: A ledger of sales, Bookkeeping entry’s of sales and purchases, income from sales of certificates and services and demand for payment.
Stuart-leslie :Dalton say’s: As my informants PAID for a service and or item(s) in the form of a certificate but did not receive a bill or receipt of payment for goods and services they procured is a direct contravention of the bill of Exchange Act 1882. The Bills of Exchange Act is based upon a pre-existing commercial contract or agreement. stuart-leslie requires you Kayleigh Roberts to rebut this point.

4. Stuart-leslie requires evidence in substance, General Register Office, why my INFROMENTS (Parents) were not informed, given full disclosure, that in order for the Act to be valid, they must consent in order for the Act of Registration to have the force of law,
5. Stuart-leslie requires evidence in substance from of the General Register Office, Why was the threat of receiving a fine if they failed to register my birth used to course my Informants to register my birth.
stuart-leslie say’s. by concealing the fact that my informants had no LAWFUL obligation to register my birth with local register office or general register office and in FACT were coursed into committing a crime(s). criminal fraud, theft, conspiracy of extortion, theft and fraud, racketeering. stuart-leslie requires you Kayleigh Roberts to rebut this point.

R v Donovan [1934 ] 2 KB 498 at 507, [1934] All ER Rep 207 at 210. In delivering Judgment of the court of crimanal Appeal Swift J said; if an act is unlawful in the sence of being in itself a criminal act, it is plain that it cannot be rendererd Lawful because the person to whose detriment it is done consents to it. No person can licence another to commit a crime.
6. stuart-leslie requires evidence in substance to why the ‘General Register Office, and or Local Register Office’ are not legally obliged to keep a record of all document(s) pertaining to STUART LESLIE specifically relating to the creation of certificate: BCF5***65.
7. stuart-leslie requires evidence in substance to why the ‘General Register Office, and or Local Register Office’ are not LAWFULLY obliged to keep a record of all document(s) pertaining to STUART LESLIE specifically relating to the creation of certificate: BCF5***65.
8. Stuart-leslie requires evidence in substance to why you can not provide evidence to deny that my informants were coursed to comply with the demand for payment without a commercially recognised bill, then my informants would have knowingly given consent and conspired to a commercially fraudulent action. This would make my informants culpable under current legislation for that action. I believe that my Informants would not knowingly create liability against themselves or create culpability

9. Stuart-leslie requires evidence in substance, that the serial number contained on STUART LESLIE(s) certificate, is simply a number which relates to that particular certificate only, and that there is no truth in FACT that STUART LESLIE(S) certificate Number has been monetised and traded as evidenced on https://www.treasurydirect.gov/BC/SBCPrice.
Stuart-leslie say’s: I have evidence obtained from https://www.treasurydirect.gov/BC/SBCPrice that shows not only; STUART LESLIE(s) certificate number BCF5***65 but also HIS, PASSPORT NUMBER, DRIVER LICENCE NUMBER, NATIONAL INSURANCE NUMBER (N.I), NATIONAL HEALTH NUMBER (NHS), EUROPEAN HEALH INSURANCE CARD NUMBER, at the very least are traded as (EE, E), PAPER SAVING BONDS .
Stuart-leslie requires you to rebut this point.
10. Stuart-leslie requires evidence in substance, that the serial number contained on STUART LESLIE(s) certificate, is simply a number which relates to that particular certificate only, and that there is no truth in FACT that STUART LESLIE(S) certificate Number has been monetised and traded, monies can be traces back to at least two accounts.
First (1st ) IBAN Details for 083210 /005***65 HMRC DIRECT TAXES – GOVERNMENT BANKING.
Second (2nd ) IBAN Details for 090025 / 005***65 Abbey National Treasury Services Plc - Abbey Nat (Overseas) W/Sale based in St Helier
Jersey. A tax haven never the less.. https://www.sortcodes.co.uk/
Stuart-leslie :Dalton say’s: why would a simple number on a certificate, correspond to two separate undisclosed bank accounts, if not for the purpose transfer the monies raised from the bonds to fill the government coffers.
Evidence suggests the revenue raised by TAXING the income, spending, saving(s) of British Public i.e.: HMRC TAXES is deposited into a Germany Based Citibank account with links to the Vatican.
Stuart-leslie requires you to rebut this point.

11. Stuart-leslie requires evidence in substance, that you of the General Register Office unequivocally deny that the certificate(s) issued to STUART LESLIE does not in FACT contain a de-based text/language GLOSSA.
Stuart-leslie say’s: that the use of the all caps GLOSSA has deliberately been used to deceive STUART LESLIE and his INFORMANTS.
stuart-leslie requires you Kayleigh Roberts to rebut this point.

We also require a Postal Address, Where we can send you a copy of our sworn affidavit, in keeping with Section 196(4) of the law of property Act 1925 (LPA 1925) provides that:
Any Notice shall also be sufficiently served if it served by Registered Post or Recorded Delivery by Virtue of section 1 of the recorded delivery service Act 1962, furthermore, under section 127(4) of the postal services act 200 and PSA act 2000 Sch 8 Pt ll, paras 2-3. Not a P.O box number.
we would also like to inform you Kayleigh Roberts that if you fail to rebut in substance or produce a sworn affidavit we will peruse this matter and seek disclosure via PART 31 - DISCLOSURE AND INSPECTION OF DOCUMENTS.

Yours sincerely,

Stuart-leslie