Daniel Curtis - District Judge (Magistrates' Court)
Dear Ministry of Justice,
Please confirm when District Judge Curtis became appointed as a district judge and the length of his term of office.
List his qualifications and training and if his training is up to date, and which cases he is qualified to hear.
List the dates he has sat last year and this and at which courts and the nature of the matter heard, such as family , council tax, insolvency , charging orders etc.
How many complaints have been received about his conduct.
Yours faithfully,
fFaudwAtch UK
Dear fFaudwAtch UK,
Please note, under section 8(1) of FOIA, a request for
information must comply with three requirements. It must:
(a) be in writing,
(b) state the name of the applicant and an address for correspondence, and
(c) describes the information requested.
After initial consideration, this request appears to comply with requirements (a) and (c) but it does not comply with requirement (b) because you have not provided your full name.
I am therefore not required to process your request without information that can later be referred to, as per Section 8(1)(b) FOIA. The information we require is your name.
As your request has been deemed invalid, I am not obliged to disclose the requested information at this point and I would like to take this opportunity to recommend that any future FOI submissions adhere to Section 8 of the FOIA.
To enable us to meet your request, please resubmit your application in accordance with the above requirements. We will consider your resubmitted request upon receipt as long as it meets the requirements stated above.
You will then receive the information requested within the statutory timescale of 20 working days as defined by the Act, subject to the information not being exempt.
You can find out more about Section 8 by reading the extract from the Act available at the attached link:
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2000...
Kind regards,
Data Access and Compliance Unit
Dear Data Access & Compliance Unit,
Of course.
Yours sincerely,
N Gilliatt AKA fFaudwAtch UK
Dear N. Gilliat,
Please find attached a response to your request of 3 June.
Thanks
Chukwuma
Chukwuma Uju l Royal Courts of Justice | Strand | WC2A 2LL |
This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying
is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy
all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message
could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in
mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message
by e-mail.
This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be
read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not
broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
Dear Uju, Chukwuma,
Thank you for your response.
I would like clarifying what is meant by 'anything appropriate' regarding the response in the matter of the cases he can be listed to hear.
Yours sincerely,
fFaudwAtch UK
Dear N. Gilliat,
I have attached a link to the Judicial Appointment Commission’s website
which explains the jurisdiction of a District Judge (Magistrates' Courts).
Regards
Chukwuma
[1]https://jac.judiciary.gov.uk/vacancies/887
Dear Ministry of Justice,
Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of Information reviews.
I am writing to request an internal review of Ministry of Justice's handling of my FOI request 'Daniel Curtis - District Judge (Magistrates' Court)'.
Thank you for the information relating to the elements of my request which have already been provided.
I would like the decision regarding the training and conduct complaint elements reviewing.
I contest the application of the exemption (s 32) as it clearly relates to material only held in relation to particular court cases.
A judge's complaint record might not relate to any specific cases. Any link to a particular case would be incidental and could be removed before disclosure. Information on complaints would be held for purposes in addition to any related cases.
A judge when acting as a judge is an office holder who is not acting in a personal capacity. While there may be personal information in a complaints record, that shouldn't preclude most of the record being released with any personal material redacted.
The reasons given above for why details regarding the complaint should be released are also applicable to disclosing the training record.
The description given in relation to the nature of the matters heard have not been given. It has only been stated whether they were criminal or not.
A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is available on the Internet at this address: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/d...
Yours faithfully,
fFaudwAtch UK
Dear Mr Gilliatt
Please find attached response to your internal review request.
Yours sincerely
Eileen Mannion
Senior caseworker
JCIO
This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying
is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message
could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in
mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message
by e-mail.
This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be
read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not
broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
fFaudwAtch UK (Account suspended) left an annotation ()
It will have to be positioned somewhere on the ever increasing list of things to do.
Katie Tate left an annotation ()
Some background here:
https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/the-hi...
An insight is given into the standard of treatment you can expect to receive in the Magistrates' court.
'Many experienced advocates still fly by the seat of their pants in the magistrates' court and pick up files without reading them thoroughly.
Woe betide any higher court advocate who attempts the same before a circuit judge.'
We work to defend the right to FOI for everyone
Help us protect your right to hold public authorities to account. Donate and support our work.
Donate Now
Dorothy Matricks (Account suspended) left an annotation ()
Some of it is here.
Appointed 14 November 2005.
http://www.m2.com/m2/web/story.php/20050...