We don't know whether the most recent response to this request contains information or not – if you are [Name Removed] (Account suspended) please sign in and let everyone know.

Cycling and cycling infrastructure expenditure

[Name Removed] made this Freedom of Information request to Bromley Borough Council as part of a batch sent to 149 authorities This request has been closed to new correspondence. Contact us if you think it should be reopened.

We're waiting for [Name Removed] (Account suspended) to read recent responses and update the status.

To Whom it May Concern,

1) Please provide information on how much has been spent on cycling infrastructure in the area you're responsible for, broken down each year for the last 5 available financial years.

Where cycling provision has been provided as part of wider improvement works, these should be listed as cost for the cycling-related improvements, not for the entire project.

2) Please also list the amount spent, sorted by Funding Type/Source (e.g. Capital, Section 106, Central Government funding initiatives), broken down each year for the last 5 available financial years.

3) Please detail how much has been spent, broken down by year, on dedicated segregated cycling infrastructure (only dedicated cycle paths featuring light, full or kerb segregation away from motor vehicles, NOT included on-road painted cycle lanes, shared usage paths or existing re-purposed shared usage infrastructure such as canal towpaths or greenways).

For the avoidance of doubt, segregation refers to the physical separation of cyclists from motorised traffic, and can be provided by the following:
Kerbs
Kerbed plinths AKA Armadillos
Bollards
Soft margins or verges
Crash barriers (Trunk roads)

4) Please detail how many miles of segregated infrastructure has been built in the last 5 years (only dedicated cycle paths featuring light, full or kerb segregation away from motor vehicles, NOT included on-road painted cycle lanes, shared usage paths or existing re-purposed shared usage infrastructure such as canal towpaths or greenways).

For the avoidance of doubt, segregation refers to the physical separation of cyclists from motorised traffic, and can be provided by the following:
Kerbs
Kerbed plinths AKA Armadillos
Bollards
Soft margins or verges
Crash barriers (Trunk roads)

Yours faithfully,

[Name Removed]

Dear Bromley Borough Council,

I am emailing to request a response on this FOI from mid February 2020.

It has been over 60 working days and I have not received any response as of 31 May 2020.

Yours faithfully,

[Name Removed]

Bromley Borough Council

2 Attachments

  • Attachment

    ATT00001.delivery status

    0K Download DSN: 4.4.7 Delivery time expired

  • Attachment

    ATT00002

    6K Download

Delivery is delayed to these recipients or groups:

[1][email address]

Subject: Re: Freedom of Information request - Cycling and cycling
infrastructure expenditure

This message hasn't been delivered yet. Delivery will continue to be
attempted.

The server will keep trying to deliver this message for the next 1 days,
19 hours and 55 minutes. You'll be notified if the message can't be
delivered by that time.

References

Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]

ES Freedom of information (Group), Bromley Borough Council

Dear Requester,

 

Further to your recent EIR enquiry (20123) having completed my enquiries,
please see response(s) to your EIR request highlighted in blue below,
which have been provided by a senior member of staff in the Environmental
Services and Public Protection department.

 

EIR RESPONSE(S) BELOW:

 

Please provide information on how much has been spent on cycling
infrastructure in the area you're responsible for, broken down each year
for the last 5 available financial years.

 

Where cycling provision has been provided as part of wider improvement
works, these should be listed as cost for the cycling-related
improvements, not for the entire project.

 

2) Please also list the amount spent, sorted by Funding Type/Source (e.g.
Capital, Section 106, Central Government funding initiatives), broken down
each year for the last 5 available financial years.

 

3) Please detail how much has been spent, broken down by year, on
dedicated segregated cycling infrastructure (only dedicated cycle paths
featuring light, full or kerb segregation away from motor vehicles, NOT
included on-road painted cycle lanes, shared usage paths or existing
re-purposed shared usage infrastructure such as canal towpaths or
greenways).

 

For the avoidance of doubt, segregation refers to the physical separation
of cyclists from motorised traffic, and can be provided by the following:

Kerbs

Kerbed plinths AKA Armadillos

Bollards

Soft margins or verges

Crash barriers (Trunk roads)

 

4) Please detail how many miles of segregated infrastructure has been
built in the last 5 years (only dedicated cycle paths featuring light,
full or kerb segregation away from motor vehicles, NOT included on-road
painted cycle lanes, shared usage paths or existing re-purposed shared
usage infrastructure such as canal towpaths or greenways).

 

For the avoidance of doubt, segregation refers to the physical separation
of cyclists from motorised traffic, and can be provided by the following:

Kerbs

Kerbed plinths AKA Armadillos

Bollards

Soft margins or verges

Crash barriers (Trunk roads)

 

Response:

 

A high level figure of what is spent (or nearly spent) on Local Cycle
Infrastructure in the current financial year is £958,000. This figure is
broken down as;

 

Local Cycle Infrastructure schemes is £130,000

Cycle Parking including Cycle Hub at stations £378,000

TfL funded Cycleway from  £450,000 circa  

 

These figures should be similar to the past 5 years except for the
 Cycleway and major cycling scheme like Crofton Lane Scheme which is
currently being designed and implemented.

 

Unfortunately, we are unable to provide answers for questions 2-4, and
have applied the exception 12(4) (b) as below:

 

To use this exception we have to provide a Public Interest Test
In favour of disclosure In favour to maintain the exception
12(4)(b) manifestly  unreasonable
request
We recognise there is a legitimate This information is refused on the
public interest in promoting the basis that the request is manifestly
accountability and transparency of unreasonable and would be detrimental
public authorities. by diverting critical times and
resources away from London Borough of
  Bromley duties. There is information
  in the public domain  that can be
obtained from TFL that allows further
Allowing individuals to understand understanding and this is a factor
decisions made by public authorities that weighs against release of the
affecting their lives and, in some requested information given then
cases, assisting individuals in burden this would place on staff
challenging those decisions. resources.

 
Having considered the balance of public interest, it is our view that the
exception is maintained, for the reasons noted above.

 

 

 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We trust this completes your EIR enquiry which has now been closed.

 

Thank you for your request.

 

Regards

 

 

FOI Co-ordinator

Environment and Public Protection

London Borough of Bromley

[1]www.bromley.gov.uk

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Please note:

 

Section 1 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) places two duties
on public authorities.  Unless exemptions apply, the first duty at Sec
(1)(a) is to confirm or deny whether the information specified in a
request is held.  The second duty at Sec (1)(b) is to disclose information
which is permitted to the public domain and that has been confirmed as
being held.  Where exemptions are relied upon s17 of FOIA requires that we
provide the requester with a notice which: a) states fact b) specifies
exemption(s) in question and c) states (if that would not otherwise be
apparent) why exemption applies.

 

Section 12 (1) of the Freedom of the Freedom of Information Act states
that a public authority is not obliged to:…. “comply with a request for
information if the authority estimates that the cost of complying with the
request would exceed the appropriate time limit of 18 hours of an officers
time to manually review records, retrieve and collate the data which we
are not obliged to do under the act if to do so would exceed the 18 hour
time limit.

 

If you are unhappy with the way your request for information has been
handled, you can make a complaint and request a review by writing to:

London Borough of Bromley, Mr Graham Walton – Democratic Services, Civic
Centre, Stockwell Close, Bromley, Kent, BR1 3UH, Telephone: 0208 461 7743

 

If you remain dissatisfied with the handling of your review, you have a
right to appeal directly to the:Information Commissioner's Office,
Wycliffe House, Water Lane, Wilmslow, Cheshire, SK9 5AF, Telephone: 0303
123 1113 or 01625 545 745.

 

References

Visible links
1. http://www.bromley.gov.uk/

We don't know whether the most recent response to this request contains information or not – if you are [Name Removed] (Account suspended) please sign in and let everyone know.