Covid jab questions

The request was successful.

Dear Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency,

Under FOI, I would like to ask the following questions:

1. Regarding the Covid jab, were the trials performed in independent research laboratories to ensure unbiased reporting? Please supply specific information for each manufacturer.

2. Were these jabs performed to internationally recognised and regulated standards?

Yours faithfully,

Julie Moffat

MHRA Customer Services, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency

Our Ref: FOI 22/1075

Dear Julie Moffat,

RE: REQUEST UNDER THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT 2000

Thank you for your enquiry which we received on 31st October 2022.

I confirm that your request is now being handled under the Freedom of Information Act and you should receive a reply within 20 working days from our date of receipt.

If you need to contact us again about this request, please quote the reference number above.

Please be aware that we publish FOIs replies and these are redacted and are located on our website at the following link below.
https://www.gov.uk/government/collection...

Kind Regards,

MHRA Customer Experience Centre
Communications and engagement team
Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency
10 South Colonnade, Canary Wharf, London E14 4PU Telephone 020 3080 6000

show quoted sections

MHRA Customer Services, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency

FOI 22/1075

Dear Julie Moffat,

Thank you for your email.

Regarding the below questions:

1. Regarding the Covid jab, were the trials performed in independent research laboratories to ensure unbiased reporting? Please supply specific information for each manufacturer.
This information is published by the EMA:
https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlo...

2. Were these jabs performed to internationally recognised and regulated standards?
Information concerning how injections were performed during the clinical trials are available in via the above-linked data published by the EMA.

Please see below for information:
https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlo...

https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlo...

The temporary authorisations of the Pfizer/BioNTech, Oxford/AstraZeneca and Moderna vaccines was done through an expedited rolling review. A ‘rolling review’ can be used to complete the assessment of a promising medicine or vaccine during a public health emergency in the shortest time possible. This is done as the packages of data become available from ongoing studies on a staggered basis. The temporary authorisation under Regulation 174 permits the supply of identified vaccine batches, based on the safety, quality and efficacy data submitted to MHRA. These authorisations do not constitute a marketing authorisation.

All vaccines are tested through three phases of clinical trials to ensure they meet the gold standard. Phase 1 trials are with a small group of people to make sure there are no safety concerns and determines the appropriate dosage for the best immune response. Phase 2 trials are conducted on a larger group of people to check the vaccine works consistently and that the immune response is sufficient. Phase 3 trials test the vaccines on thousands of people for scientists to assess if the vaccine is producing immunity that will prevent disease. Usually, these phases are run in sequence, but in an effort to find a safe and effective Covid-19 vaccine as quickly as possible, once safety has been ascertained through Phase 1, Phases 2 and 3 are being run in parallel. Extensive checks and balances are required at every stage of the development of a vaccine, and this is no different for a Covid-19 vaccine. No stages in the vaccine development processes were bypassed.

The temporary authorisations for use of the COVID-19 vaccines in the UK followed a rigorous scientific assessment of all the available evidence of quality, safety and effectiveness by the UK regulator, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). The MHRA expert scientists and clinicians reviewed data from the laboratory pre-clinical studies, clinical trials, manufacturing and quality controls, product sampling and testing of the final vaccine, and also considered the conditions for its safe supply and distribution. The decision was made with advice from the Commission on Human Medicines (CHM), the government’s independent expert scientific advisory body. Regarding the MHRA approval of the Pfizer/BioNTech, Moderna and the Oxford/AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccines, further information (including information for physicians and recipients of the vaccine, and Public Assessment Reports [PARs] for each vaccine) are available on the MHRA website. Links to these are provided below:

https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlo...

https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlo...

https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlo...

Please note that a marketing authorisation was granted for the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine (Comirnaty) following a European Commission (EC) decision on 21 December 2020 (PLGB 53632/0002). Further information is available on the European Medicines Agency (EMA) website, a link to this is provided below:

https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlo...

If you have a query about the information provided, please reply to this email.

If you are dissatisfied with the handling of your request, you have the right to ask for an internal review.
Internal review requests should be submitted within two months of the date you receive this response and addressed to: [MHRA request email]

Please remember to quote the reference number above in any future communications.

If you were to remain dissatisfied with the outcome of the internal review, you would have the right to apply directly to the Information Commissioner for a decision.

Please bear in mind that the Information Commissioner will not normally review our handling of your request unless you have first contacted us to conduct an internal review.

The Information Commissioner can be contacted at:
Information Commissioner’s Office
Wycliffe House
Water Lane
Wilmslow
Cheshire
SK9 5AF

Kind Regards

MHRA Customer Experience Centre
Communications and engagement team
Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency
10 South Colonnade, Canary Wharf, London E14 4PU Telephone 020 3080 6000

show quoted sections

MHRA Customer Services, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency

MHRA Customer Services would like to recall the message, "FOI 22/1075 - Freedom of Information request - Covid jab questions".

DISCLAIMER This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any reading, printing, storage, disclosure, copying or any other action taken in respect of this email is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by using the reply function and then permanently delete what you have received. Incoming and outgoing email messages are routinely monitored for compliance with the Department of Health's policy on the use of electronic communications. For more information on the Department of Health's email policy, click DHTermsAndConditions<https://www.gov.uk/help/terms-conditions>

MHRA Customer Services, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency

FOI 22/1075

Dear Julie Moffat,

Thank you for your email.

The temporary authorisations of the Pfizer/BioNTech, Oxford/AstraZeneca and Moderna vaccines was done through an expedited rolling review. A ‘rolling review’ can be used to complete the assessment of a promising medicine or vaccine during a public health emergency in the shortest time possible. This is done as the packages of data become available from ongoing studies on a staggered basis. The temporary authorisation under Regulation 174 permits the supply of identified vaccine batches, based on the safety, quality and efficacy data submitted to MHRA. These authorisations do not constitute a marketing authorisation.

All vaccines are tested through three phases of clinical trials to ensure they meet the gold standard. Phase 1 trials are with a small group of people to make sure there are no safety concerns and determines the appropriate dosage for the best immune response. Phase 2 trials are conducted on a larger group of people to check the vaccine works consistently and that the immune response is sufficient. Phase 3 trials test the vaccines on thousands of people for scientists to assess if the vaccine is producing immunity that will prevent disease. Usually, these phases are run in sequence, but in an effort to find a safe and effective Covid-19 vaccine as quickly as possible, once safety has been ascertained through Phase 1, Phases 2 and 3 are being run in parallel. Extensive checks and balances are required at every stage of the development of a vaccine, and this is no different for a Covid-19 vaccine. No stages in the vaccine development processes were bypassed.

The temporary authorisations for use of the COVID-19 vaccines in the UK followed a rigorous scientific assessment of all the available evidence of quality, safety and effectiveness by the UK regulator, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). The MHRA expert scientists and clinicians reviewed data from the laboratory pre-clinical studies, clinical trials, manufacturing and quality controls, product sampling and testing of the final vaccine, and also considered the conditions for its safe supply and distribution. The decision was made with advice from the Commission on Human Medicines (CHM), the government’s independent expert scientific advisory body. Regarding the MHRA approval of the Pfizer/BioNTech, Moderna and the Oxford/AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccines, further information (including information for physicians and recipients of the vaccine, and Public Assessment Reports [PARs] for each vaccine) are available on the MHRA website. Links to these are provided below:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publicatio...

https://www.gov.uk/government/publicatio...

https://www.gov.uk/government/publicatio...

Please note that a marketing authorisation was granted for the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine (Comirnaty) following a European Commission (EC) decision on 21 December 2020 (PLGB 53632/0002). Further information is available on the European Medicines Agency (EMA) website, a link to this is provided below:
https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/h...

Please also note that a marketing authorisation was granted for the Moderna vaccine on 31 March 2021 following an EC Reliance Procedure (PLGB 53720/0002). Further information is available on the MHRA website and the EMA website, links to these are provided below:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publicatio...
https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/h...

A marketing authorisation has been granted for the Janssen Covid-19 vaccine on 28 May 2021. Further information is available via the below link:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publicatio...

In addition, a marketing authorisation was granted for the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine on 24 June 2021 following an EC Reliance Procedure (PLGB 17901/0355). Further information is available on the MHRA website and the EMA website, links to these are provided below:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publicatio...

https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/h...

A marketing authorisation was granted for Valneva suspension for injection (PL 43185/0002) on 13 April 2022. A link to the Public Assessment Report is provided below:
https://mhraproducts4853.blob.core.windo...

Further information on other vaccines for Covid-19, including the bivalent vaccines are available on the MHRA website, please see the link below:
https://mhraproducts4853.blob.core.windo...

Regarding your specific questions:

1. Regarding the Covid jab, were the trials performed in independent research laboratories to ensure unbiased reporting? Please supply specific information for each manufacturer.
We are assuming by trials you mean clinical trials submitted to MHRA for the authorisation of each vaccine (which is what is meant by "each manufacturer"). The original data submitted for the authorisation of each vaccine is published by the EMA, a link to the data is provided below:
https://clinicaldata.ema.europa.eu/web/cdp

2. Were these jabs performed to internationally recognised and regulated standards?
Information concerning how injections were performed during the clinical trials are available in via the above-linked data published by the EMA.

If you have a query about the information provided, please reply to this email.

If you disagree with how we have interpreted the Freedom of Information Act 2000 in answering your request, you can ask for an internal review. Please reply to this email, within two months of this reply, specifying that you would like an Internal Review to be carried out.

Please remember to quote the reference number above in any future communications.

If you were to remain dissatisfied with the outcome of the internal review, you would have the right to apply directly to the Information Commissioner for a decision. Please bear in mind that the Information Commissioner will not normally review our handling of your request unless you have first contacted us to conduct an internal review. The Information Commissioner can be contacted at:

Information Commissioner’s Office
Wycliffe House
Water Lane
Wilmslow
Cheshire
SK9 5AF

Yours sincerely

MHRA Customer Experience Centre
Communications and engagement team
Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency
10 South Colonnade, Canary Wharf, London E14 4PU Telephone 020 3080 6000

show quoted sections

CHP Gillow left an annotation ()

Comparison of the first and second versions of the response may be of interest. Some text has been moved. Other text has been added, the latter including dates of marketing authorisations by EMA and/or MHRA.