Court record (Caseman) Verification request to the Ministry of Justice.

Blaise Tchoula made this Freedom of Information request to Ministry of Justice

This request has been closed to new correspondence from the public body. Contact us if you think it ought be re-opened.

The request was successful.

Verification Of Court Records Required By The Ministry Of Justice

Dear Ministry of Justice,

This is a request under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 directed to the Ministry of Justice Technology directorate and also to the Information Asset Owner (IAO) holding the data relating to all civil court proceedings.

Any response not from any of the two departments about will not be accepted as any of you having discharged his/her duty under the law.

1) Confirm that you have all the recorded information stored and managed in your secure data centre system managed by the MoJ Technology directorate for the following case: C2DQ62D2 allegedly issued by the County Court Business Centre. allegedly issued by the County Court at Northampton.

2) Confirm that all the recorded information contained in the computerised court record for the County Court case as reference above was process in according to your internal procedure which requires for these to be directly transferred to the MoJ by the administration of the County Court of Northampton who allegedly created and input information into the CASEMAN system and it is now controlled by the MoJ Technology directorate.

3) Confirm that all the recorded information relevant to this alleged County Court case C2DQ62D2 is in possession of the Information Asset Owner (IAO) as a member of the Operational Directorate and as part of all the data held, relating to all civil court proceedings.

4) Provide all the recorded information including the direct mailing address and contact details for the MoJ Technology directorate and also for the Information Asset Owner (IAO) dealing with all the data stored for County Court, eg. C2DQ62D2 created by the County Court at Northampton.

This request relies on the requester's fundamental Human Rights and is presented to you to defend my Human Rights under Article 6 granting Right to a fair trial and Article 8 granting me the Right to have respect for my private and family life.

Yours faithfully,

Blaise Tchoula

1 Attachment

Good afternoon,

 

Please find attached response to your request for information under the
Freedom of Information Act.

Becca McVeigh

HMCTS I County Court Business Centre I Team Leader

Address:
County Court Business Centre
St Katharine’s House
21 – 27 St Katharine’s Street
Northampton
NN1 2LH
Tel: 0300 123 1059 / 01604 619450 TEC Helpdesk

Tel: 0300 123 1058 / 01604 619435 CAPS Helpdesk

I am not authorised to bind the Ministry of Justice contractually, nor to
make representations or other statements which may bind the Ministry of
Justice in any way via electronic means 

 

show quoted sections

Dear CCBC,

Dear Mrs B McVeigh,

Thank you for your prompt response.
My apology for the mistake
The correct claim number in question is C5DQ62D2 as i checked.
Many thanks for your anticipated response.

Yours

Yours sincerely,

Blaise Tchoula

1 Attachment

 

Thank you for emailing the County Court Business Centre (CCBC). You should
expect to receive a response within 5, but no later than 10 working days of
receipt. Please note that court staff are not legally trained and will not be
able to respond to your query if you have not quoted the claim number.

 

If you are a claimant please click [1]here for our Money Claim Online User
Guide which includes detailed and useful information about all aspects of your
claim progression.

 

 

IMPORTANT

You will need to send any ‘claim response’ which includes the acknowledgment of
service, part admission or defence/counterclaim forms as well as directions
questionnaires (DQs) directly to [2][email address] to ensure that they
are filed correctly. Your email has not been forwarded.

 

N244 and N245 applications should be sent to [3][email address]

 

The deadline for documents to be received is 4pm, any documents received after
this time will be classed as received on the next working day.

  

The office will be closed on all bank holidays in 2017.

 

 

 

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying
is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy
all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message
could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in
mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message
by e-mail.

This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be
read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not
broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

References

Visible links
1. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/sy...
2. mailto:[email address]
3. mailto:[email address]

Dear CCBC,

for the second time,
I have now provided you with the correct number which is repeated here and have been awaiting for your response for the longest while. C5DQ62D2.

Yours sincerely,

Blaise Tchoula

1 Attachment

Good afternoon,

 

Please find attached response to your request for information under the
Freedom of Information Act.

 

Becca McVeigh

 

HMCTS I County Court Business Centre I Team Leader

 

 Address:

 County Court Business Centre

 St Katharine’s House

 21 – 27 St Katharine’s Street

 Northampton

 NN1 2LH

 Tel: 0300 123 1059 / 01604 619450 TEC Helpdesk

 

 Tel: 0300 123 1058 / 01604 619435 CAPS Helpdesk

 

 I am not authorised to bind the Ministry of Justice contractually, nor to

 make representations or other statements which may bind the Ministry of

 Justice in any way via electronic means 

 

show quoted sections

Dear Ministry of Justice,

Dear Ministry of Justice,
Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of Information reviews.
I am writing to request an internal review of Ministry of Justice's handling of my FOI request 'Court record (Caseman) Verification request to the Ministry of Justice.'.

1) The response did not come from the Ministry of Justice but by HMCTS. Please clarify if the response you provided was on behalf of the Ministry of Justice.?

2) I have seen this routine response into other responses.

3) The exemptions Under sections 32(3) and 40(5) of the FOIA quoted have been inappropriately used and it is an abuse of process and a violation of my Human Rights Act 1998 Article 6, etc.... .

3)(a) You have failed to put forward reasons why you have come to the conclusion that any of the question requiring a Yes or a No answer will infringe the laws that you are referring to?
3)(b) Or/and you have failed to explain and give reason how the answer Yes or No will violate, infringe the law section of the law that you are referring to?

4) Dealing with each question separately please give each one of them a serious review. You were provided with the case number C5DQ62D2 and without revealing a single name.
4) I am not requiring any name or secret to be reveal. I am must tell you that i am investigating a fraud and that you might be brought into the investigation is you choose to ignore this response or continue to provide ambiguous answer to simply questions,

5) My advise to you is to keep in mind my Human right when responding to this matters. There is no breach of any personal data that can be validly quoted for all my questions. And the yes and no answers required does not violate the law neither?

6) You are duty bound to answer this question or you will be concealing information and conspiring with criminals, and you might be one of them. I am aware of the fact that the Computired Court Record for this alleged file or case says that no money have been received by the court as payment in filling it.

7) Hence, your stand in taking the position that you taking and refusing to answer this very specific question of yes and no will lead a reasonable man (a jury) to easily conclude and beyond reasonable doubt that you are concealing the information.

8) The fact that the answer is not coming from the MOJ or the IAO but from the court who allegedly created and issue this claim which is suspected as being bogus, the fee has not been paid. It causing me to raise my eyes brows and to conclude as follow.

8)(a) That my suspicion that the CASEMAN in fraud or/and fraudulent product in covering tracks is getting really higher. That is mingle with the information that we got from MOJ about how your IT system Functions and who is responsible of what.

9) Although the question seek a yes or no answer, it is extremely precise as to who should be providing that yes or no answer. You must put the request to the right chanel please or/and confirm that you are the right chanel and which law gives you the authority to answer on behalf of any of the two organisation to which the question have been specifically addressed.

10) Additionally could you also provide me with the information regarding the process in triggering an internal investigation of fraud within the MOJ.?

11)Public servant most operate within absolute transparency. Furthermore the exemptions quoted cannot be used in support of your response because there you have failed to proof that the Information I requested was neither held nor duly created or recorded by any public authority.

11)(a) If the correct people were to tell the truth in answering the questions then they will be bring some serious trouble to the pretender at HMCTS who i suspect are dealing in parallel courts that they are presenting to people and depriving them of their accept without due process.

11)(b) The most worrying thing is that judges are buying it, i am starting to suspect that they some of them might be part of this fraud. My experience is that i have seen judge getting upset about the question of fees and i have seen this claimant not even saying a word and when they provided evidence of them having paid the alleged fee, the fee could not be reconcile with those of the HMCTS that they would have allegedly given their money to.

12) In one of my cases I pointed out that the fee has not been paid and the court has therefore no jurisdiction in dealing with cases which have not been put before them. The judge was not happy with me and told me that I not entitle to it and that his record shows that the fee has been paid.
12)(a) May be is a simply miss understanding or is goes deeper than that. I do not know. All I want if for you not be obstructive and let the right people answer the questions. As far as I am concern only those working directly with the two entitle named should anse
Please take this matter seriously and speak the truth. You have no one the protect. The truth is sufficient.
I am expecting to year from you within 10 days. Thank you.
A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is available on the Internet at this address: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/c...
Yours faithfully,
Blaise Tchoula

Privacy warning: Your message, and any response to it, will be displayed publicly on this website.

A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is available on the Internet at this address: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/c...

Yours faithfully,

Blaise Tchoula

NW Regional Support Correspondence,

1 Attachment

Dear Mr Tchoula,
 
Please find attached an acknowledgement to your request for an Internal
Review.
 
Kind regards
 
Knowledge Information Liaison Officer 

North West Regional Support Unit | HMCTS | Manchester Civil Justice Centre
| 1 Bridge St West | Manchester M60 9DJ  | DX724780 Manchester 44  |
Minicom V11 020 7210 2231  |

Email: [1][email address]

I am not authorised to bind the Ministry of Justice
contractually, nor to make representations or other
statements which may bind the Ministry of Justice
in any way via electronic means.

 

 

 

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying
is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy
all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message
could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in
mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message
by e-mail.

This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be
read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not
broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

References

Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]

NW Regional Support Correspondence,

1 Attachment

Dear Mr Tchoula,
 
Please find attached a response to your Internal Review request.
 
Kind regards
 
Knowledge Information Liaison Officer 

North West Regional Support Unit | HMCTS | Manchester Civil Justice Centre
| 1 Bridge St West | Manchester M60 9DJ  | DX724780 Manchester 44  |
Minicom V11 020 7210 2231  |

I am not authorised to bind the Ministry of Justice
contractually, nor to make representations or other
statements which may bind the Ministry of Justice
in any way via electronic means.

 

 

 

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying
is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy
all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message
could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in
mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message
by e-mail.

This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be
read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not
broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.