Correspondence about the Arundel Bypass and the South Downs National Park boundary

West Sussex County Council did not have the information requested.

Dear West Sussex County Council,

I would like to see all correspondence between the Countryside Agency and West Sussex County Council in the year 2002 about the proposed Arundel Bypass and the boundary of the proposed South Downs National Park.

This correspondence is referred to in Halcrow's Arundel Area Study, which at 7.7.2-3 said: ‘The current proposed boundary for the National Park includes Tortington Common and part of the flood plain south of Arundel. As such, the proposed alignment for the Arundel bypass lies within the draft boundary. However, it is noted from correspondence between the Countryside Agency and West Sussex County Council that the boundary may be reviewed once the SoCoMMS multi modal study has been completed.’

Halcrow were the consultants for the Government's South Coast Multi Modal Study (SoCoMMS).

Yours faithfully,

Emma Tristram

westsussex@infreemation.co.uk, West Sussex County Council

Dear emma tristram

Thank you for your request which has been assigned reference FOI/2340

Freedom of Information request - Correspondence about the Arundel Bypass
and the South Downs National Park boundary

If you have submitted a request under the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) or the Environmental Information Regulations (EIR), we aim to
respond within the statutory timescale of 20 working days, i.e. by or on
01/06/2021. However please be aware that timescales may be extended
following the declaration on 6th January 2021 of a major incident relating
to the Covid pandemic in Sussex 

Should you have any further enquiries concerning this request, please
reply to this email leaving the subject line unchanged.

Yours sincerely,
West Sussex County Council

 

Did you make your request via our online form at
[1]https://foi.infreemation.co.uk/westsusse... not, why not use it
in future for a simple and convenient way to make FOI requests.

References

Visible links
1. https://foi.infreemation.co.uk/westsusse...

westsussex@infreemation.co.uk, West Sussex County Council

 

Dear emma tristram ,

Thank you for your enquiry reference FOI/2340.  In order to try and
identify and locate the information that you have asked for the Council
reasonably requires some clarification of your request. I will need this
information before we can take this matter further.

In particular, please you could confirm for which year you intend to ask
for information. Your request says 2002 but I wanted to check whether this
was a typo and you actually meant 2020.

Please send your clarification by responding to this email. Please do not
amend the Subject line.

I look forward to hearing from you.

Yours sincerely,

Dave Loveman

Customer Relations Manager

Dear [email address],
Re my FOI request FOI/2340, yes, I did mean 2002 - the year that the Halcrow study (South Coast Multi Modal Study) was published.
I have already replied to your letter by email. Please let me know if you require further clarification.

Yours sincerely,

Emma Tristram

westsussex@infreemation.co.uk, West Sussex County Council

Dear emma tristram,

Our Ref: FOI/2340

On 30/04/2021 you made the following request for information, which has
been dealt with in accordance with the provisions of the Freedom of
Information Act 2000/Environmental Information Regulations 2004 [select
appropriate statute].

EIR Re: Correspondence about the Arundel Bypass and the South Downs
National Park boundary

We have now completed a search for the information which you requested and
confirm that this Authority does not hold data relevant to your request.

The County Council does not retain all correspondence in perpetuity
and following a review of files by officers in Transport Planning,
Environment & Heritage and Legal Services has been unable to locate the
information that has been requested.

If appropriate, explain why the Authority does not hold the data (not our
remit/we do not store because/whatever)

If you have any queries about this response, please contact me  by
responding to this email. Please do not amend the Subject line.

If you are unhappy with the way your request has been handled, you may
wish to ask for a review of our decision by responding to this email.
Please do not amend the Subject line.

If you are not content with the outcome of the internal review, you may
apply directly to the Information Commissioner for a decision. Generally,
the ICO cannot make a decision unless you have exhausted our internal
review procedure. The Information Commissioner can be contacted at:

[1]www.ico.org.uk; or

The Information Commissioner's Office,
Wycliffe House, Water Lane, Wilmslow, Cheshire SK9 5AF.

Please remember to quote the reference number above in any future
communications.

Yours sincerely,

Hayley, CI Group FOI, Highways and Transport

 

References

Visible links
1. http://www.ico.org.uk/