Conservative Party Autumn Conference 2011
Zoe O'Connell made this Freedom of Information request to Greater Manchester Police This request has been closed to new correspondence. Contact us if you think it should be reopened.
Dear Greater Manchester Police,
For the security vetting/accreditation procedure carried out for the Conservative Party Autumn Conference 2011, please can you supply:
1) A copy of any equalities impact assessment carried out in relation either to the vetting procedure or overall policing.
2) A copy of procedures put in place for handling vetting for any minorities groups that might have been adversely affected by the process, if any.
The total number of people who:
3) Applied to be accredited...
4) ...and were then approved.
5) ...and were then rejected...
a) ...but the party permitted entry anyway.
b) ...but the party did not permit entry.
6) ...but did not complete the process...
a) ...because the police did not complete the process in time.
b) ...because the individual did not complete the process. (e.g. documents still pending by conference date, or they explicitly withdrew)
For each of the above, please break down if possible the number of people who applied by category, e.g. Members/Party Staff, Media, Exhibitors etc.
7) The estimated cost of the vetting process.
Yours faithfully,
Zoe O'Connell
Dear Zoe,
I write in connection with your request for information which was received
by Greater Manchester Police today. Your request will now be considered
in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the Act). You will
receive a response within the statutory timescale of 20 working days as
defined by the Act, subject to the information not being exempt or
containing a reference to a third party.
In some circumstances Greater Manchester Police may be unable to achieve
this deadline. If this is likely you will be informed and given a revised
time-scale at the earliest opportunity.
There may be a fee payable for the retrieval, collation and provision of
the information you request. If this is the case you will be informed and
the 20 working day timescale will be suspended until we receive payment
from you. If you choose not to make payment then your request will remain
unanswered.
Some requests may also require either full or partial transference to
another public authority in order to answer your query in the fullest
possible way. Again, you will be informed if this is the case.
Should you have any further inquiries concerning this matter, please write
or contact The Information Access Team, on any of the following telephone
numbers 0161 856 2529.
Kind regards
Caroline Barker
Information Access Officer
Information Governance Unit
Information Management Branch
From: Zoe O'Connell <[FOI #87982 email]>
To: FOI requests at Greater Manchester Police
<[Greater Manchester Police request email]>
Date: 03/10/2011 13:02
Subject: Freedom of Information request - Conservative Party Autumn
Conference 2011
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Greater Manchester Police,
For the security vetting/accreditation procedure carried out for
the Conservative Party Autumn Conference 2011, please can you
supply:
1) A copy of any equalities impact assessment carried out in
relation either to the vetting procedure or overall policing.
2) A copy of procedures put in place for handling vetting for any
minorities groups that might have been adversely affected by the
process, if any.
The total number of people who:
3) Applied to be accredited...
4) ...and were then approved.
5) ...and were then rejected...
a) ...but the party permitted entry anyway.
b) ...but the party did not permit entry.
6) ...but did not complete the process...
a) ...because the police did not complete the process in time.
b) ...because the individual did not complete the process. (e.g.
documents still pending by conference date, or they explicitly
withdrew)
For each of the above, please break down if possible the number of
people who applied by category, e.g. Members/Party Staff, Media,
Exhibitors etc.
7) The estimated cost of the vetting process.
Yours faithfully,
Zoe O'Connell
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #87982 email]
Is [Greater Manchester Police request email] the wrong address for Freedom
of Information requests to Greater Manchester Police? If so, please
contact us using this form:
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be
published on the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
[1]http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/offic...
If you find this service useful as an FOI officer, please ask your
web manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
This e mail carries a disclaimer, a copy of which may be read at:
http://www.gmp.police.uk/mainsite/pages/...
References
Visible links
1. http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/offic...
Dear Madam,
Please find attached correspondence in relation to the above request.
Kind regards
Corine Phipps
Information Access Officer
Greater Manchester Police
Information Access Team
Information Services Branch - Business Operations
External Tel: 0161 856 2528/2529
Internal Tel: 62528/62529
Fax: 0161 856 2535
Email: [email address]
** NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED **
This e mail carries a disclaimer, a copy of which may be read at:
Dear Madam,
Please find attached a response to the above request.
Kind regards
Corine Phipps
Information Access Officer
This e mail carries a disclaimer, a copy of which may be read at:
Dear Madam,
Re: Answer to Question 7.
In order to put the figure in answer to question 7 into context, please
note the figure is for the National Accreditation work which covered all
three main political party conferences.
Kind regards
Corine Phipps
Information Access Officer
Greater Manchester Police
Information Access Team
Information Services Branch - Business Operations
External Tel: 0161 856 2528/2529
Internal Tel: 62528/62529
Fax: 0161 856 2535
Email: [email address]
** NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED **
We work to defend the right to FOI for everyone
Help us protect your right to hold public authorities to account. Donate and support our work.
Donate Now