Dear Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council,
To whom it may concern
1. How many individuals is the local authority acting as an appointee for, please?
2. How many of these individuals (in area or out of area) pays adult social care charges to the council for non-residential services?
3. Which department is responsible for administering appointeeship?
4. Which department is responsible for assessing social care charges?
5. How many officers in either department carry out an overlapping role with regard to appointeeship and care charges?
6. How many times has the appointeeship team responded to a consultation on behalf of individuals or any group of benefits claimants regarding a change in the council’s charging policy, since 2015?
7. How many appeals about care charges has the appointeeship team submitted to the financial assessment team since 2015?
8. How many complaints has the appointeeship team submitted regarding care charges since 2015?
9. How many times has the appointeeship team sought or referred individuals they act for, to independent advice (whether third sector, legal aid or privately funded) about care charges, since 2015?
10. How many times has the appointeeship team questioned the accuracy, fairness or legal validity of individuals’ care charges or the council’s charging policy, since 2015?
11. Does the council treat appointeeship as a Care Act service? If so, does it charge for that as part of the Care Act charging system?
12. How much does it charge, if it makes a charge, per month or per week or per year, please?
13. If appointeeship is not provided for through the Care Act, does the council allow for a DRE deduction from Disability Benefits income, for the charge it makes for appointeeship (assuming a person is otherwise chargeable)?
14. If the council does not operate appointeeships for adult social care clients, does the council permit a full DRE deduction from Disability Benefits income, for any charge levied by any other corporate or private appointee (assuming a person is otherwise chargeable)?
15. In respect of all council clients who are currently in receipt of adult social care services, regarded as liable to pay a charge for their adult social care services, for whom the appointee role is currently undertaken - how is the relevant department holding the appointeeship responsibility proposing to manage the conflict of interest presented by the judgment in the Norfolk CC v SH case in December 2020, given that the decision means that other similar policies are presumptively unlawful? Please answer with a sentence or a paragraph; it is suggested that it is not a proper response to say that no decisions have been made, as yet, because the problem already exists.
Belinda Schwehr, CEO, CASCAIDr. www.CASCAIDr.org.uk
Your contact has been received by the Customer Feedback, Information and
Improvement Team. Your request will now be considered and you will be
contacted again shortly to advise what will happen next with your request
for information. Please be assured that any contact we receive will be
considered and processed at the earliest opportunity.
In the meantime we would like to thank you for your contact.
Please visit the Council’s website for further information on information
*** Barnsley MBC Disclaimer: This e-mail and any files attached are
confidential for the use of the intended recipient. If you have received
this e-mail in error please notify the sender as soon as possible and
delete the communication from your system without copying, disseminating
or distributing the same in any way by any means. Any views or opinions
expressed belong solely to the author and do not necessarily represent
those of the Council. In particular, the Council will not accept liability
for any defamatory statements made by email communications. Recipients are
responsible for ensuring that all e-mails and files sent are checked for
viruses. The Council will not accept liability for damage caused by any
virus transmitted by this e-mail. No guarantees are offered on the
security, content and accuracy of any e-mails and files received. Be aware
that this e-mail communication may be intercepted for regulatory, quality
control, or crime detection purposes unless otherwise prohibited. The
content of this email and any attachment may be stored for future
Re: Request for Information – Freedom Of Information Act 2000.
Thank you for your request for information about conflict of Interest in relation to Client Finance/Appointeeship and the possibility that social care charges are unlawful.
Your email request was received on 22/03/2021 and I am dealing with it under the terms of the Freedom Of Information Act 2000.
Your request will be processed as soon as possible, and we will try to provide the information within 20 working days as required. The deadline date when the information should be available to you is 21/04/2021.
In some circumstances a fee may be payable and if that is the case, I will let you know the likely charges before proceeding.
If you have any queries about this email, please contact us. Please remember to quote the reference number above in any future communications.
Information Requests Team
Good afternoon Belinda,
Please find attached the results of my findings for your FOI request.
Customer Feedback, Information & Improvement Officer
Core Services Directorate
BU15 - Business Improvement, Human Resources & Communications
Westgate Plaza One
C/O Corporate Mail Room
PO Box 634
We work to defend the right to FOI for everyone
Help us protect your right to hold public authorities to account. Donate and support our work.Donate Now