Complaint (CO/00432/15) - PC Thomas Blake

The request was partially successful.

fFaudwAtch UK (Account suspended)

Dear Humberside Police,

This request relates to an innocent member of the public being stitched-up with the suspected motivation being that the victim had got on the wrong side of the police by highlighting matters for which the force is complicit in substantial fraud.

A complaint was made about PC Thomas Blake on 8 November 2015, as it was suspected that this officer had incited witnesses (who had lied) to commit perjury, but six months on there is no outcome.

Please disclose records held by the force relating to this matter.

Yours faithfully,

fFaudwAtch UK

Information Compliance, Humberside Police

Thank you for your request for information.  If you are requesting
information under the Freedom of Information Act or the Environmental
Information Regulations you will receive a response within the statutory
20 working days.

We aim to respond to any other enquiries within 20 working days. Further
information on requesting information can be found on this [1]link.

 

Internet Email should not be treated as a secure means of communication.
To ensure regulatory compliance Humberside Police monitors all Internet
Email activity and content. This communication is intended for the
addressee(s) only. Unauthorised use or disclosure of the content may be
unlawful. If you are not a named addressee, you must not disclose, copy,
print, or in any other way use or rely on the data contained in this
transmission. If received in error you should notify the sender
immediately and delete this Email Humberside Police routinely checks
e-mails for computer viruses. However addressees are advised to conduct
their own virus checks of all e-mails, & any attachments). Opinions
expressed in this document may not be official policy. Thank you for your
co-operation. Humberside Police

References

Visible links
1. http://www.humberside.police.uk/your-rig...

fFaudwAtch UK (Account suspended) left an annotation ()

It would be interesting to know just what it is with public bodies that makes it so difficult for them to take responsibility for their actions and facing the truth.

fFaudwAtch UK (Account suspended)

Dear Information Compliance,

Response to this request is delayed. By law, Humberside Police should have responded by 7 June 2016.

Yours sincerely,

fFaudwAtch UK

Information Compliance, Humberside Police

Thank you for your request for information.  If you are requesting
information under the Freedom of Information Act or the Environmental
Information Regulations you will receive a response within the statutory
20 working days.

We aim to respond to any other enquiries within 20 working days. Further
information on requesting information can be found on this [1]link.

 

Internet Email should not be treated as a secure means of communication.
To ensure regulatory compliance Humberside Police monitors all Internet
Email activity and content. This communication is intended for the
addressee(s) only. Unauthorised use or disclosure of the content may be
unlawful. If you are not a named addressee, you must not disclose, copy,
print, or in any other way use or rely on the data contained in this
transmission. If received in error you should notify the sender
immediately and delete this Email Humberside Police routinely checks
e-mails for computer viruses. However addressees are advised to conduct
their own virus checks of all e-mails, & any attachments). Opinions
expressed in this document may not be official policy. Thank you for your
co-operation. Humberside Police

References

Visible links
1. http://www.humberside.police.uk/your-rig...

fFaudwAtch UK (Account suspended)

Dear Humberside Police,

Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of Information reviews.

I am writing to request an internal review of Humberside Police's handling of my FOI request 'Complaint (CO/00432/15) - PC Thomas Blake'.

Response to this request is delayed. By law, Humberside Police should have responded by 7 June 2016.

A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is available on the Internet at this address: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/c...

Yours faithfully,

fFaudwAtch UK

Information Compliance, Humberside Police

Thank you for your request for information.  If you are requesting
information under the Freedom of Information Act or the Environmental
Information Regulations you will receive a response within the statutory
20 working days.

We aim to respond to any other enquiries within 20 working days. Further
information on requesting information can be found on this [1]link.

 

Internet Email should not be treated as a secure means of communication.
To ensure regulatory compliance Humberside Police monitors all Internet
Email activity and content. This communication is intended for the
addressee(s) only. Unauthorised use or disclosure of the content may be
unlawful. If you are not a named addressee, you must not disclose, copy,
print, or in any other way use or rely on the data contained in this
transmission. If received in error you should notify the sender
immediately and delete this Email Humberside Police routinely checks
e-mails for computer viruses. However addressees are advised to conduct
their own virus checks of all e-mails, & any attachments). Opinions
expressed in this document may not be official policy. Thank you for your
co-operation. Humberside Police

References

Visible links
1. http://www.humberside.police.uk/your-rig...

fFaudwAtch UK (Account suspended)

Dear Information Compliance,

If there is no response by 30 June 2016 I will assume Humberside police has no intention of replying and prefer that I escalate the matter to the Information Commissioner.

Yours sincerely,

fFaudwAtch UK

Information Compliance, Humberside Police

Thank you for your request for information.  If you are requesting
information under the Freedom of Information Act or the Environmental
Information Regulations you will receive a response within the statutory
20 working days.

We aim to respond to any other enquiries within 20 working days. Further
information on requesting information can be found on this [1]link.

 

Internet Email should not be treated as a secure means of communication.
To ensure regulatory compliance Humberside Police monitors all Internet
Email activity and content. This communication is intended for the
addressee(s) only. Unauthorised use or disclosure of the content may be
unlawful. If you are not a named addressee, you must not disclose, copy,
print, or in any other way use or rely on the data contained in this
transmission. If received in error you should notify the sender
immediately and delete this Email Humberside Police routinely checks
e-mails for computer viruses. However addressees are advised to conduct
their own virus checks of all e-mails, & any attachments). Opinions
expressed in this document may not be official policy. Thank you for your
co-operation. Humberside Police

References

Visible links
1. http://www.humberside.police.uk/your-rig...

fFaudwAtch UK (Account suspended) left an annotation ()

Complaint sent to Information Commissioner's Office about Humberside Police failing to deal with my FoI request.

Information Commissioner's Office
Wycliffe House
Water Lane, Wilmslow
Cheshire SK9 5AF

2 July 2016

Dear Sir/Madam

RE: INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF FOI REQUEST TO HUMBERSIDE POLICE – (REF NONE)

I made a freedom of information request to Humberside Police (‘HP’) on 9 May 2016. Details can be found on the “what do they know” website at the following address:

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/c...
Complaint (CO/00432/15) - PC Thomas Blake

You will see from the contents of the above that HP had not responded by the 7 June deadline and on the 8 June I notified it about the delay which was not responded to and so submitted a request for review on 17 June on the grounds that there had been no response.

I communicated on 27 June to HP that if it had not responded by 30 June I would assume it would have no intention of doing so and prefer that I escalate the matter to the Information Commissioner.

In essence, HP has not responded to any of the communications other than those which were computer generated.

Yours sincerely

fFaudwAtch

fFaudwAtch UK (Account suspended) left an annotation ()

It's of concern that 45 weeks have passed with no sign that the police have taken any steps in determining an outcome.

fFaudwAtch UK (Account suspended) left an annotation ()

The minute you engage with the police in a complaint you make the injustice suffered 1,000 times worse. The complaint procedure is governed by statute and the police are expert in exploiting the relevant laws so they can f_ your life up for as long as you allow them.

For the avoidance of doubt, the whole process is a sham. They will use tricks of the trade like for example record your complaint wrongly so you have no appeal rights, and/or prolong the complaint over several months or even years knowing full well that when they do eventually make a decision it will be a decision not to uphold your complaint.

They will if recording the complaint correctly give you 21 days to submit an appeal which if you do they will deal with internally (i.e., another officer looking after his colleague's best interest will be allocated the job). After wasting a year or so more of your time you will get the outcome of another sham process. You will then be informed that their decision is final and can only be challenged in the High Court which because of the impracticalities and the potential to lose your home to pay for the litigation costs is the deterrent and why they can get away with conducting sham investigations.

The Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) will not intervene if you raise concerns about the force's abuse of the system, neither will the Police & Crime Commissioner who is paid and elected to represent the public, because they too are sham organisations.

Closing In left an annotation ()

Information Commissioner's Decision Notice (6 March 2017): FS50636604

(FS50622654, FS50636574, FS50636604, FS50637739 FS50650239)

https://ico.org.uk/media/action-weve-tak...

Closing In left an annotation ()

Information Rights Tribunal, Appellant's notice (grounds of appeal) against Decision Notice:
http://tinyurl.com/mlf3657

Papers supporting Grounds of Appeal:
http://tinyurl.com/n25qdzo Exhibit 1
http://tinyurl.com/mslyuub Exhibit 2
http://tinyurl.com/n2gdz43 Exhibit 3
http://tinyurl.com/k8tlpsc Exhibit 4
http://tinyurl.com/kmkcx8t Exhibit 5

Closing In left an annotation ()

Commissioner’s Response to appeal:
https://www.scribd.com/document/34707850...

Closing In left an annotation ()

Information Rights Tribunal, Appellant’s Reply to Commissioner's Response to the Appellant’s grounds of appeal:
https://www.scribd.com/document/34850080...

Supporting papers of Appellant’s Reply:
https://www.scribd.com/document/34850090... Exhibit A-1

Closing In left an annotation ()

Tribunal's decision (20 Ocober 2017):

https://www.scribd.com/document/36212181...

Closing In left an annotation ()

Application for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal, appealing First-tier Tribunal's Decision (Information Rights).

https://www.scribd.com/document/36477038...

Closing In left an annotation ()

Tribunal judge's decision on an application for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal:

https://www.scribd.com/document/36539584...

(Permission refused on account of the application being made 6 hours and 57 minutes after the 28 day time limit)

Closing In left an annotation ()

Request for extension of time to apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal:

https://www.scribd.com/document/36551305...

(application unwittingly submitted 6 hours and 57 minutes after the 28 day time limit)

Closing In left an annotation ()

Tribunal judge's decision on a re-application for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal which included a request for extension of time to apply:

https://www.scribd.com/document/36603077...

The re-submitted application was erroneously sent omitting information referred to on the application form for permission to appeal, namely "reasons why the application is late"

Permission was refused because of this. The missing information (the reasons) has now been sent.

Closing In left an annotation ()

Application to the Upper Tribunal for permission to appeal (the First-tier Tribunal refused permission).

1 January 2018
https://www.scribd.com/document/36849189...

Closing In left an annotation ()

Acknowledgement of application to the Upper Tribunal for permission to appeal:

4 January 2018

https://www.scribd.com/document/36951293...

Closing In left an annotation ()

Decision letter of application to the Upper Tribunal for permission to appeal:

18 January 2018
https://www.scribd.com/document/36963193...

Closing In left an annotation ()

The judge's reasons for refusing permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal.

https://www.scribd.com/document/36963211...

There is a right to apply for the decision to be reconsidered at an oral hearing which must be in writing within 14 days from the date of the letter of 18 January 2018.

Closing In left an annotation ()

Letter in response to the Upper Tribunals Notice of Determination of Application for Permission to Appeal to the Upper Tribunal.

31 January 2018
https://www.scribd.com/document/37043750...

Closing In left an annotation ()

The Upper Tribunal's acknowledgement and response:

9 February 2018
https://www.scribd.com/document/37114559...

Looking for an EU Authority?

You can request documents directly from EU Institutions at our sister site AskTheEU.org . Find out more .

AskTheEU.org