Dear Liverpool City Council,
Under the terms of the Freedom of Information Act we are requesting all past information on Daniel Hughes and Hughes PR
1/ Daniel Hughes in several statements claims to have worked for and with Liverpool city council can the council explain his role and what payments were made to his company.
2/ The Mayor of Liverpool in the past had said he has never met Mr. Hughes or used the company “Hughes PR.” Is this correct?
3/ Cllr Joeann Calvert has refused to reply or even come forward as to her partnership and paid role working for Daniel Hughes and Hughes PR, on the failed scam Fox Street Village project that had to be closed down as it was a huge fire risk, has the council not checked her involvement with Gary Howard, John Howard and Lee Carroll all were behind Fox Street Village did Cllr Calvert, not inform the council of the past history of both John Howard and Lee Carroll while she was working with and for them with Daniel Hughes and Hughes PR?
Several requests were sent to her and to Cllr Gary Millar, with the matter of the fire risk building and who John Howard and Lee Carroll was.
Two directors of a Liverpool recruitment agency have been given director bans for a total of 27 years for exploiting workers.
John Howard and Lee Carroll of 7 Stars have been disqualified for 15 and 12 years, respectively.
The Insolvency Service said two men also used unlicensed suppliers and foreign sources to find workers who were subject to verbal and physical threats. The company incurred a VAT debt of £325,361 for the period when Carroll was a director.
Ken Beasley, the Official Receiver in the Public Interest Unit at the Insolvency Service, said: “The company brought in foreign workers to the UK with the promise of jobs. The reality was that the workers were placed in unfit and unsafe accommodation, had deductions made from their wages for the accommodation and were paid below the minimum wage.
The council of Liverpool along with Cllr Gary Millar, Cllr Joeann Calvert, Danial Hughes, Georgie Morgan ex- Liverpool Echo reporter, and Liam Thorp all were told and fully informed in 2018/19 as to events at Fox Street Village.
In fact one local businessman was told his car and home would be set on fire if he talked about the state of the building in Fox Street Village, he had a wife and children to think of.
Was there was a cover-up, no transparency, integrity or follow- up by these persons, Liam Thorp was called many times, however he totally refused to ask both, Cllr Calvert and Daniel Hughes any questions, he was then asked why he was covering up for Cllr Calvert who the Mayors daughter is he just put the phone down.
Save This City group
With regard to all remaining aspects and content of your submission, in
the first instance the third parties named in your request are neither
current or former Council Officers or agents or provided any form of
service to the City Council nor have they been in any capacity.
In relation to the remainder of your submission, this comprises
speculation, comment and expression of opinion in relation to individuals
and seeks comment from individuals as opposed to information held by a
public authority, for which purpose Freedom of Information legislation
exists. This submission is therefore not a valid request for information
in its entirety.
In relation to the comments and speculation you make relating to
Warning - Submission of Information Requests with potentially Defamatory
It is our assessment that the content of your statements within your
request are in whole or part potentially defamatory in nature, that these
identify or refer to individuals and are being published by yourself
through the use of a public website forum to third parties.
We would further advise you that the defamatory statements made by
yourself either directly or through recognised aliases and contained
within the information requests referenced above fall within the meaning
of Article 14(1)(a) of the E-Commerce Directive (2000/31/EC). Under the
law of England and Wales, a defamatory statement is one which tends to
lower the claimant in the estimation of right thinking members of society
generally (Sim v Stretch  2 All ER 1237).
We would further advise that a defamatory statement is published at the
place where it is read, heard or seen, and is not where the material was
first placed on the internet. In internet cases, therefore, provided a
small number of people have access to the material on the internet in
England, the English courts will have jurisdiction to hear the claim
against a foreign defendant (Spiliada Maritime Corp v Cansulex Ltd 
We would therefore advise that you take prompt action to remove or
disabled access to the Offending Webpages.
In the event that this confirmation is not received, the individuals named
directly or by implication within the above referenced information
requests and publicly displayed on the Offending Websites shall reserve
the right to issue proceedings against you seeking relief for defamation.
The remedies that may be available to the these individuals include an
injunction restraining further publication of the Offending Statement
[pending trial], damages, legal costs and interest.
Information Team, Liverpool City Council
LIVERPOOL CITY COUNCIL DISCLAIMER
This email contains proprietary confidential information some or all of
which may be legally privileged and/or subject to the provisions of
privacy legislation. It is intended solely for the addressee.
If you are not the intended recipient, an addressing or transmission error
has misdirected this e-mail; you must not use, disclose, copy, print or
disseminate the information contained within this e-mail. Please notify
the author immediately by replying to this email.
Any views expressed in this email are those of the individual sender,
except where the sender specifically states these to be the views of
Liverpool City Council.
This email has been scanned for all viruses and all reasonable precautions
have been taken to ensure that no viruses are present. Liverpool City
Council cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from
the use of this email or attachments.
We work to defend the right to FOI for everyone
Help us protect your right to hold public authorities to account. Donate and support our work.Donate Now