Clarity on needed correction of error data

Waiting for an internal review by Home Office of their handling of this request.

Dear Rt Hon John Hayes
in your new role as security minister, will you please address the wrongful data that has caused sinister happenings with myself / home / property / land / credit ratings / medical records, and the failure of investigation of a serious crime of physical assault / rape , reported and statement made on 19/10/1999?
I reported a fraudulent error in the caution register in early March 2000, sending someone elses file ( mistakenly sent to me) back to land charges ( legal services commission).
When the problems of the recorded fraudulent data continued, l lobbied my MP ( Sir Peter Tapsell) in 2000 until his stepping down, with still no satisfactory corrections being made.
In your capacity over security , you need to address the false details of a neighbour protected by the witness protection plan , that has been allowed to over ride all sense of propriety , when it comes to issues of my safety and protections of the human rights act.
This site not being the correct means in which to post the direct criteria of matters that have been allowed to get so out of control, l shall await direct contact from you to then avail you of copies of the crucially important documents

Yours faithfully,

Diana Smith

FOI Requests, Home Office

Thank you for contacting the Home Office FOI Requests mailbox.

The Freedom of Information (FoI) Act 2000 provides public access to
recorded information held by the department.

If you have submitted a valid FoI request, we will acknowledge your
request within 48 hours, and aim to provide the information requested
within 20 working days as specified under the FoI Act

PLEASE NOTE

If you have a general immigration enquiry, or require an update on a
specific case, you should contact UKVI directly, contact information can
be found here:
https://www.gov.uk/government/organisati... and
[1]https://www.gov.uk/visas-immigration

General enquiries should be directed to
[2][email address]  

 

show quoted sections

Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.

References

Visible links
1. https://www.gov.uk/visas-immigration
2. mailto:[email address]

Diana Smith left an annotation ()

With over 30,000 persons permanently protected under the witness protection plan in England /Wales , my finding myself not just once , but twice, falling foul of living next door to miscreants out of control of the limitations of the law & order that the rest of society abide by, is a step too far. Whilst l respect the need for the setting up of a protection programme, there is no redress even with court involvement for when matters go horridly wrong. The Crossbow Stalker case ( read the book by Dr Alison Hewitt, that has changed how domestic violence will now be viewed by the over seeing powers that be), where an innitial compensation payment of £130,000.00p was paid last year for the hardships suffered by the Hewitt Family, because of the intervention of Dame Julie Mellor and the setting up of a Watchdog to ensure The Home Office paid out.

Dear Security Minister at The Home Office
as a follow on from my previous communication , only today has been two more incidents in the continuing harassment involving the wrong recorded details of me promoted by the home office.
Someone coming to my home to conduct vital research questions informed me my home is not showing on the survey information.
Also on speaking to The National Rape Crisis Centre today, I had to point out a legal technicality on their main website regarding the "Floating Banner" stating "Rape Should Not Be A Postcode Lottery' , when in my case it was the false postcode that was the reason to not file my statement for the crime of rape against me on 19/10/1999.
Repeated reporting of the error in the caution register did not bring about the prevention of a false caution which was the error of a legal aid charge filed in the caution register against my registered title for someone else working with at least four other parties to create an organised approach to deprive me of properties and land as the recorded proprietary owner, and "HIDDEN" by the lodging of a wrong address at Kingston upon Hull Land Registry.
Court records in June 2002 show the committing of fraud / forgery/ altered documents/ defamation of my character and Court Forms lied on.
Still no corrections were made.
There has been a total of nineteen Court Hearings with everything continually covered up to the wrongs done against me.
Please answer if this is directly aimed at me because of my status as a registered disabled person with limited mobility and my being a vulnerable woman living on my own?

Yours sincerely,

Diana Smith

FOI Requests, Home Office

Thank you for contacting the Home Office FOI Requests mailbox.

The Freedom of Information (FoI) Act 2000 provides public access to
recorded information held by the department.

If you have submitted a valid FoI request, we will acknowledge your
request within 48 hours, and aim to provide the information requested
within 20 working days as specified under the FoI Act

PLEASE NOTE

If you have a general immigration enquiry, or require an update on a
specific case, you should contact UKVI directly, contact information can
be found here:
https://www.gov.uk/government/organisati... and
[1]https://www.gov.uk/visas-immigration

General enquiries should be directed to
[2][email address]  

 

show quoted sections

Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.

References

Visible links
1. https://www.gov.uk/visas-immigration
2. mailto:[email address]

FOI Requests, Home Office

Dear Ms Smith,

Thank you for contacting the Home Office with your request.

This has been assigned to a caseworker (case ref 35377). We will aim to send you a full response by 10/06/2015, which is twenty working days from the date we received your request.

If you have any questions then please do not hesitate to contact us.

Thank you,

FOI Requests
Home Office

show quoted sections

Diana Smith left an annotation ()

Whilst l appreciate the home office replying and allocating a reference number for an investigating officer to answer, this is after total ignoral by Teresa May and her staff in the matter of a serious crime of reporting rape / stalking and many assaults resulting in my receiving hospital treatment in recent years. Involvement of the Crown Prosecution Service and investigation by the head of the Economic Crime Unit that recommended the fault of data regarding myself and my home needed addressing by the Home Office, who had last wrote to me in November 2009, with wrong data from Land Registry, who after all were covering their backs for failures throughout 1994/1995/ 1999/ 2000/2001/2002/2003/2007/2008/2009/2010/2011/2012/2013/2014, to address matters for which they stole my Conveyance Document and failed under Disclosure Laws to inform me of requests for another document ( Epitome of Title) , that was in my rightful possession as the recorded owner and would have prevented Judicial Involvement of The Adjudicator to HM Land Registry. Since 2009 the Home Office have run with Land Registry to " disengage " with me , with same measures of phone dropping and ignoral of communications, expecting me to just give up in a matter where the non-filing of my reporting the serious crime of rape ( and the persons involved), was to hide Financial Enrichment starting in the same year ( 1999), that potentially benefits the parties involved of ONE HUNDRED MILLION POUNDS because of LOCAL COUNCILS EAR MARKING of the properties / land involved.

Dear FOI Requests,
by Law, my request should normally have been responded to promptly and by 10 June 2015. My contacting the Communications Unit of The Home Office resulted in my being told no record exists of the many times l have contacted them and Teresa May. The suggestion was that l needed to change my name to ensure my communications would be received in future.
I have no wish to embark on this course of action as the person I identify to be the cause of the troubles dealt me since 1995, changed their name by deedpol to similar to my name in 2000, when l had sent her file , wrongly sent to me, back to Land Charges in March 2000, for rectification to occur

Yours sincerely,

Diana Smith

FOI Requests, Home Office

Thank you for contacting the Home Office FOI Requests mailbox.

The Freedom of Information (FoI) Act 2000 provides public access to
recorded information held by the department.

If you have submitted a valid FoI request, we will acknowledge your
request within 48 hours, and aim to provide the information requested
within 20 working days as specified under the FoI Act

PLEASE NOTE

If you have a general immigration enquiry, or require an update on a
specific case, you should contact UKVI directly, contact information can
be found here:
https://www.gov.uk/government/organisati... and
[1]https://www.gov.uk/visas-immigration

General enquiries should be directed to
[2][email address]  

 

show quoted sections

Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.

References

Visible links
1. https://www.gov.uk/visas-immigration
2. mailto:[email address]

Dear FOI Requests,
relevant response has failed to be provided for my long overdue FOI request. By law , under all circumstances , the authority and given a reference was allocated to my request, there seems to be a breakdown of communications to provide information.
Please record l am now asking for internal review

Yours sincerely,

Diana Smith

Diana Smith left an annotation ()

For other persons interested in the walls l am hitting in contact with The Home Office, l lobbied my newly elected MP ( Victoria Atkins) and met with her in May 2015. A letter from her dated 08/06/2015 ( postmarked 26/06/2015) , confirmed her writing to The Right Honourable Mike Penning on my behalf.
Checking back with The Home Office , it was confirmed to me that my letter had not been received.
Making Ms Atkins aware of this yielded no reply.
It was The Home Office who then chased Ms Atkins.
I have received another letter of confirmation of my letter being sent to The Right Honourable Mike Penning , but as yet nothing back from The Home Office in what has taken four and a half months.
Clearly the NINETEEN UNNEEDED COURT HEARINGS, and my HUMAN RIGHTS TO OWNERSHIP OF PROPERTY / LAND being breached with the theft of my own CONVEYANCE DOCUMENT and the fact LAND REGISTRY are recorded for their having breached The Data Protection Act, for non - compliance in providing copy of my own CONVEYANCE DOCUMENT, is testament to the madness of the failures of The Home Office to check thoroughly on the very people they stand by in their protection regime.
Land Registry's present position of hiding behind The Home Office , in a matter where they acted outside of their remits and felt they could continue breaching and breaking the rules by their giving 50 acres of my registered land away on 07/09/2011 , while still not having complied with the ruling of The Information Commissioners Office ( in August 2011) and their Gurmale Sondh ( Information Officer for Land Registry) , heavily redacting all information for " two - cases" , that has allowed at LEAST FOUR OTHER PARTIES to ride on the shirt tails of the party being protected by The Home Office under The Witness Protection Plan, that Land Registry have no right of involvement in.
This is how business or should l say fraud is conducted in this country, with the GOVERNMENT in it up to their necks

Looking for an EU Authority?

You can request documents directly from EU Institutions at our sister site AskTheEU.org . Find out more .

AskTheEU.org