Child trafficking in Britain

M Singh (Account suspended) made this Freedom of Information request to Ministry of Justice

This request has been closed to new correspondence from the public body. Contact us if you think it ought be re-opened.

The request was refused by Ministry of Justice.

M Singh (Account suspended)

Dear Ministry of Justice,

Child trafficking in Britain

Can you please provide a list of all, if any, Judges, CAFCASS Officers, Social Workers, Barristers, Local Authority Legal Team Officers, Local Authority Chief Executives, Directors of Children Services, Elected Members etc have ever been convicted of child trafficking by way of forced adoptions in Britain.

Yours faithfully,

M Singh

Data Access & Compliance Unit, Ministry of Justice

This is an Auto Reply from the Data Access & Compliance Unit.

Thank you for your e-mail.

If your message was a request for information please be advised that your
request is being dealt with and you will receive a written acknowledgement
shortly.

Data Access & Compliance Unit

Information Directorate

Ministry of Justice
6th Floor, Zone B, Postal Point 6.23
102 Petty France
London
SW1H 9AJ

Fax: 0203 334 2245

E-mail: [email address]

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying
is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message
could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in
mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message
by e-mail.

This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be
read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not
broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

show quoted sections

Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.

ivanataylor left an annotation ()

http://www.no2abuse.com/index.php/articl...

Please go to this link and read our story. They tried to steal my grandchild for forced adoption using bogus fabricated reports, to cover up NHS Medical Negligence.

Due to the last minute intervention and sound evidence of American Dr's the Local Authority failed with its draconian agenda for a forced adoption. In Cumbria, where we live, since 2005, 98% of all adoptions are forced, on the decision of one Judge in secret, with no redress within the secret corrupt system of child trafficking, sexual abuse in care and torture of innocent families.

Our government is full of perverts, corrupt, fraudulent despots none of whom will sign up to protecting children from being raped. Babies in infancy being raped, by elite pedophiles. Sick , sick, sick.

This has to stop NOW.

Williamson, James, Ministry of Justice

Freedom of Information Request FOI/65235/10

Data Access & Compliance Unit
Information Directorate
Zone 6 B
Post point 6.25
102 Petty France
London
SW1H 9AJ

T 020 3334 3249
F 020 3334 2245
E [email address]

www.justice.gov.uk

20-MAY-10 Our Ref:FOI/65235/10

Dear M Singh,

SUBJECT: Freedom of Information Request

Thank you for your correspondence of May 18, 2010, in which you asked
for details of Ministry of Justice employees and other individuals
convicted of child trafficking offences by way of forced adoptions in
Britain under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) from the
Ministry of Justice (MoJ).

You will receive a response from us by June 15, 2010. Your request has
been passed to the appropriate business unit within the MoJ, and they
will write to you with their decision by this date.

The FOIA does provide a number of exemptions. A qualified exemption
requires that before relying on it we must consider the public interest
test. If the information you have requested is covered by a qualified
exemption(s) under FOIA, the Department is allowed to take longer than
20 working days to respond. This is because in such circumstances we are
required to consider the public interest issues when deciding whether or
not to disclose the information requested.

If more time is needed to consider the public interest issues under a
qualified exemption(s), we will write to you and inform you of the
revised date you can expect to receive a response to your request.

If you have any queries regarding this request please do not hesitate to
contact us. Please quote ref: FOI/65235/10 in all future correspondence.

Yours sincerely,

James Williamson

(Sent on behalf of Paul Hunt)
Data Access and Compliance Unit

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying
is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message
could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in
mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message
by e-mail.

This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be
read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not
broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

show quoted sections

Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.

M Singh (Account suspended) left an annotation ()

Parents will find this of great interest forewarned is forearmed !

http://www.badfullywrong.org.uk/Evidence...

I respectfully submit my finding’s regarding the CAFCASS –CORAM Partnership.

CAFCASS are required by Law to be independent of all childcare related organisations and legal institutions.
Their sole purpose - to ensure that the child's interests are held paramount at all times.

Their latest published annual returns acknowledge payments from government in excess of £104 million. Willingly paid by the UK public with the assurance that CAFCASS will always maintain the principal of in

"The Best Interest of The Children"

The UK public’s current perception of CAFCASS, due to their performance, stats, in addition to the latest OFSTED report, is at an all time low. The would prefer them replaced with the assurance of the new organisation retaining the primary objective
of their very existence

"Ensuring and Safeguarding Our Children's Future".

CAFCASS joined in partnership on April 4th 2008 by Coram a registered charity,

(Annual turnover in (2005-2006) of 18 million).
No mention has been made available regarding Coram's background.

Coram

Coram began as a Masonic refuge for orphaned children and widows by Thomas Coram in 1739 and claimed status of charity under Royal Charter on 17th. October 1739 and further acts of parliament of 1740, 1885, and 1936.

Status of Coram 2005-2006 -

After Coram acquired their latest Adoption Centre 1st. April 2005 from the “Children’s Society” Renaming it “Ebony Care”, East Midlands
Coram then claimed to be the 3rd largest adopter of children in the UK.

They provide children for adoption to married, single parents, same sex couples, employment not essential, homeowner or tenant, not an issue, children can also be adopted to be resident out with the UK.

They promote their new adoption program - “Concurrent Placement”, which advocates placing a child at birth with the potential adopter’s until the Legal case is finalised in an effort to promote the “Bonding Process” with the adoptive parent.

They assist in the process of obtaining the current rate of payment for Foster Carer’s for the potential adopter’s.

Their only condition appears the potential adopter must pass the "Enhanced Disclosure" check
and sit Coram’s specifically written - "Parenting Skills Training for Adopters”,

A program written in conjunction with their partner “Anna Freud Centre” with the aid of the
Webster Stratton book – “The Incredible Years”

As stated on their web-site www.coram.org.uk they would consider adoption an option in
cases where -

(1) Parents cannot agree on residence.
(2) Parents cannot agree on contact.

No mention is made throughout this advertisement of any threshold criteria to be reached, or more importantly any Child Protection issues, only disagreement issues.

Coram facilitated and was reimbursed for over 200 contact sessions on behalf of CAFCASS in the recorded year.

Coram taught school personnel to spot the “Early Signs of Neglect”, and Child Abuse signs.

Coram taught Social Service Workers “Child Protection” issues based on their again exclusive self-written courses.

In essence - Coram teach the professional’s how to address Child Protection issues.

Coram designed and obtained an AQA for their program – “Life & Social Skills Programme” designed to assist their young homeless people live their life.

Coram had current agreements with surrounding Authorities –

Camden, Brent, Hammersmith and Fulham, Islington, Westminster, Kilburn,
Tower Hamlets, Milton Keynes, Southwark, Thamesmead
.
Coram has numerous separate companies; some related and included in their charity ventures. Some not e.g. their financially successful “Research Unit”

Examples of Coram’s Ventures –

Sure Start – High view
Sure Start – Holloway
Sure Start – Roundwood
Sure Start – South Kilburn
Sure Start – King’s Cross and Holburn
Sure Start – Barking and Dagenham
Sure Start – Camden Wide
Milton Keynes Family Support Service
Ebony Care, Adoption Centre, East Midlands

Coram Services –

Parent Training
Working in Schools
Young Parent Projects
Parent Education
Drop in Crèche facilities
Outreach Workers
Personal Advisory Service
Supported Accommodation
Mentoring and Education
Fathers Work
Youth Offending
Work in Communities and schools

Coram supply –

Management of Local Authority Adoptions
Specialised training for Social Workers involved with family placements

Coram provide –

Adult Consultation
Child and Adult Psychiatry
Adult Psychology
Mental Health

Coram’s partners the “Tavistock Centre” assist with the psychology and psychiatry aspects.

2005-2006 Coram began to fund a future venture, recorded comments include –

“Funding major challenge facing Coram in coming year to find best workable solution to attaining long term financial viability”

“The reconstructing is an ongoing process which planned to be completed during 2006-2007”

“Providing better value for money to our funder’s in Social Services and supporting people”

Coram began to train Lawyers and Foster Carer’s for supervised contact.

Review and upgrade all policies and procedures.

Coram today -

Coram provides training for Social Services.

Work in total partnership with CAFCASS

Provide training courses for professionals in Child Protection Roles

Provide Parenting Classes for parents and potential adopters

Provide babies from birth for their “Concurrent Placement” scheme

Oversee Contact sessions

Provide legal representation for family court procedures.

Provide assessments with the assistance of the “Tavistock Centre”

Coram even offer a comprehensive service to such adults and birth relatives seeking
information after the adopted person turns eighteen. For some this may even lead to contact
with a birth relative.

In 2005-2006 Coram was able to assist 81 people seeking information about their life history.
62 Adoptions versus 81 Adopted adults now seeking their life history.

The information contained in these three pages is a condensed version of part of the
background of the Coram Charity.

Which fact contained in this factual recorded report, even in part does not contain an element that is not a total “Conflict of Interest”?

Personal View -

It is my understanding we are still entitled to our own personal opinion in this country.

In addition to be entitled to voice our opinions and views, In fact I believe this to be Law.

I claim that right now as a British Citizen.

I believe that Coram have in conjunction with other agencies planned, funded and made ready
for this partnership since 2005-2006. Prepared and ready for Carcass’s inevitable fall from
grace.

It is my belief that Coram has now total coverage of the potential for the adoption of children who are in the legal process here in the UK.

Consider these facts, CAFCASS deal with 100,000 app. contacts a year, at present Coram deal
with 6,000. They recorded 62 official adoptions.
What percentage of these cases that Coram appear to have an element of control over, including their physiological assessments, contact, legal debate and access, will appear in next recorded Adoption figures.

The UK government withdrew their embarrassing “Forced Adoption Target’s” April 1st 2008.

Coram joined in partnership less than 4 days later.

Is this meant to reassure the UK public, whose views of Social Services are at rock bottom?

My understanding due to recent media coverage is that our government has recently funded for our Social Service Departments to receive further training, I believe Coram will provide this training.

I believe this, as I know of no other organisation that trains already trained to a standard of
acceptance by the Social Work Governing Bodies.

May I state the obvious?

Why are we training already fully trained professional Social Workers that may have already had a say in our courts regarding our children’s futures?

If they were not trained to the extent that is required due to lack of education, there may
potentially be cases that have been processed wrongly?

I, as a UK citizen am outraged that a registered Adoption Charity, with an annual turnover
Of 18 million can re-locate and facilitate a replica charity in the US including a University in
Dallas Texas, all relating to adoptions and fostering.

A registered Charity who owns a Fostering Company, who own a financially successful Research Company whose research is primarily Child related.

In addition I am shocked that a Charity located in such close proximity to children
Facilitate partnerships with worldwide known organisations e.g. “Tavistock Centre” and “Anna
Freud Centre”, who gained this notoriety for their documented trials on children, using drugs
and mind control techniques, all to achieve the result of control

Chambers, Sharon, Ministry of Justice

1 Attachment

Dear M Singh,

Thank you for your e.mail below. This has been passed to me for reply,
which I now attach.

Many thanks.

Sharon.

<<FOI request M Singh (65235) final reply.doc>>

Sharon Chambers
Her Majesty's Courts Service / Operations and Performance Directorate -
Supporting our people, courts & processes

HMCS Business Information Division
2nd Floor - 2.23
102 Petty France
London SW1H 9AJ

Tel: 0203 334 6708
e.mail: [email address]

show quoted sections

ivanataylor left an annotation ()

Article 13 ECHR Human Rights.

In the British Modal Article 1 has been omitted.
It reads as follows:-

"The High Contracting Parties shall secure to everyone within their jurisdiction the rights and freedoms detailed in section 1 of this Convention".

The British modal also omits Article 13 which reads as follows:-

Right to an effective remedy

"Everyone whose rights and freedoms as set forth in this Convention are violated shall have an effective remedy before a national authority notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity".

I wonder why Britain has omitted these two?

Could it be that they do not want us to know our fundamental Human Rights, as it would affect their authorities, ie Police and social services and others who are daily violating our Human Rights?

This, in my opinion is how they propose to get away with violations, and I intend to hold them to account for this. Please share this information with interested parties. Our government are being devious and trying to escape being accountable. They know exactly what they are doing. this is by design and no mistake. We need to make people aware of what their rights are and encourage them to enforce their rights on the corrupt British system.